
Your definition is slightly different than china's or mine. To me Love is a state of being, a state of grace, of being connected to the source of all there is. To be in that state, there is no competition, no desire, no jealousy or insecurity. It is difficult to be in that state and function in a society that is all that and more.

If an adult is looking for love they are most likely to find it 90% of the time only if they have a fat wallet. 90% of love has begun from financial motivation. You have no money you have fewer or no friends.
Quote has been trimmed, See full post:
If you talk about love in its purity, money must stay out of the equation, because money is a cancer.
But there are pure examples of love in humanity not powered by Money.
The question you ask your self is, whether your present love relationship is hinged on financial motives.
If it is, then you get busy and start looking for love that doesn’t cost an arm and a leg.
If that is the case forget about it, it is a phony and useless mind game.

Hey Talloola good day to you,
Quote has been trimmed, See full post:
you are a MERITAL RARITY now days, especially when you look at the divorce rate is huge, particularly going and coming out of a huge recession, then one can test the metal of love putting up as they say during thick and thin.
90 present of love is about how stable a person is, how stable a family is evolving around one another.
Stability starts from food on the table and the roof over the family’s heads; these two are the most fundamental necessities in maintaining a life with dignity, which to day are at an all time low, so low, to the line of the ground so low, for this reasons puissance and the theory of love start to fade in the economic picture.
If there is no money there is no love in the majority of human thinking.
In today’s international and interracial world of love, one witnesses the fact that many people from many Asian countries have a warm approach to materialize and they would for example choose to...

that is a sad conclusion, and may be true, but it isn't in my world, and
never will be.
my world is one of simplicity and thoughtfullness of one another, and we
have struggled through lean times, and have never been rich, at least in
the financial area.
I see the same character in our daughters, and it is something to treasure,
and nurture, and probably something that is getting left behind in this
day and age.
I don't want any part of chasing the money, at the end of it all, money
doesn't know anything about love, it is needed to eat and house us, but
too much of it, isn't necessary, and binds us to the material side of life,
and those are just 'things'.
I do understand that, many years ago, women had to look for security, as
they were so 'held back' in society, they needed someone who could provide
security, but they paid a big price for that, as they were nothing more than
house workers, with no power, in many cases, not now.