Anti-Vax Mom: Dying from Disease is “Part of the Plan”


tay
#1
“My religious beliefs are if you get sick with something, it’s part of your plan in life,” said Kayla Dee, a mother of non-vaccinated children in Rochester. “So, why get the vaccinations to try to prevent it?

Yeah those diseases are going to suck if you get them, but if you live through them, great! If you don’t, that’s your plan in life. Also, medically, it’s against my beliefs because who really know what’s in these vaccinations?”

Dee says she will be homeschooling her children while she fights against the state law.

Officials with the school district say parents must fill out the legal exemption paperwork if their children are to return to school to be in compliance with the law.

Minnesota Anti-Vax Mom: Dying from Disease is "Part of the Plan" - KVRR Local News (external - login to view)


 
mentalfloss
#2
Putting her in jail is part of the plan as well then.
 
Curious Cdn
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

Putting her in jail is part of the plan as well then.

Putting her in a rubber room makes more sense.
 
Danbones
+1
#4  Top Rated Post
she could share yours!
 
Hoof Hearted
#5
You put jackets on children so they don't catch colds in the winter...sunscreen in the Summer so they don't burn...etc. How is getting vaccinated any different?

Somebody should punch this woman in the face, and when she complains, just tell her it was "part of the plan".
 
taxslave
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

Putting her in jail is part of the plan as well then.

Put her in jail for what? Not sharing your views? Typical lefty, must conform to groupthink.
 
Hoof Hearted
#7
It's a form of child abuse...why would jail be so wrong?
 
taxslave
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoof HeartedView Post

It's a form of child abuse...why would jail be so wrong?

DEpends on your views of BIG PHARMA. Just to blindly accept that whatever the government tells you to do is good for you without question isn't exactly smart either. REmember how well Thalomyde worked out? There are lots of other examples of how well government and Big Pharma collusion didn't work out so well for the users. I see making a child go to church as child abuse but lots of people do it.
 
Remington1
+1
#9
A happy delusioned person!! Stats speak for themselves, many deadly decease are under control due to vaccination. If vaccination should be stopped, deceases would return. In my opinion science needs to go forward, not backward.
 
taxslave
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by Remington1View Post

A happy delusioned person!! Stats speak for themselves, many deadly decease are under control due to vaccination. If vaccination should be stopped, deceases would return. In my opinion science needs to go forward, not backward.

I don't think it is quite that simple. By vaccinating against everything we run the risk of compromising our group immune system. Might happen, might not.
How do you feel about your food sources being vaccinated? I ask because I have run into people that are dead set against farm fish and meat being vaccinated but get flu vaccine themselves. SOme of them know the difference between vaccines and hormones.
 
MHz
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

Putting her in jail is part of the plan as well then.

When the vaccine kills the child which employee is the one who will be going to jail?

USA: Highest Vaccination Rate in the World Has the Worst Health (external - login to view)
That “worst health” label includes a ranking of 34th in the world with infant mortality. In other words, the USA has the 34th worst infant survival with its highest rate of vaccinations. Some are directly from multiple vaccinations administered.

But the USA leads the world in infant vaccinations (external - login to view), those administered during the first year after their births – 26 vaccinations during that time.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
The infant mortality rate (IMR) is one of the most important indicators of the socio-economic well-being and public health conditions of a country. The US childhood immunization schedule specifies 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year—the most in the world—yet 33 nations have lower IMRs. Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.70 (p < 0.0001) was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants. Nations were also grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges: 12–14, 15–17, 18–20, 21–23, and 24–26. The mean IMRs of all nations within each group were then calculated. Linear regression analysis of unweighted mean IMRs showed a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates, with r = 0.992 (p = 0.0009). Using the Tukey-Kramer test, statistically significant differences in mean IMRs were found between nations giving 12–14 vaccine doses and those giving 21–23, and 24–26 doses. A closer inspection of correlations between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and IMRs is essential.

Keywords: infant mortality rates, sudden infant death, SIDS, immunization schedules, childhood vaccines, drug toxicology, synergistic effects, linear regression model
Go to:
Introduction

The infant mortality rate (IMR) is one of the most important measures of child health and overall development in countries. Clean water, increased nutritional measures, better sanitation, and easy access to health care contribute the most to improving infant mortality rates in unclean, undernourished, and impoverished regions of the world.13 In developing nations, IMRs are high because these basic necessities for infant survival are lacking or unevenly distributed. Infectious and communicable diseases are more common in developing countries as well, though sound sanitary practices and proper nutrition would do much to prevent them.1
The World Health Organization (WHO) attributes 7 out of 10 childhood deaths in developing countries to five main causes: pneumonia, diarrhea, measles, malaria, and malnutrition—the latter greatly affecting all the others.1 Malnutrition has been associated with a decrease in immune function. An impaired immune function often leads to an increased susceptibility to infection.2 It is well established that infections, no matter how mild, have adverse effects on nutritional status. Conversely, almost any nutritional deficiency will diminish resistance to disease.3
Despite the United States spending more per capita on health care than any other country,4 33 nations have better IMRs. Some countries have IMRs that are less than half the US rate: Singapore, Sweden, and Japan are below 2.80. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “The relative position of the United States in comparison to countries with the lowest infant mortality rates appears to be worsening.”5
There are many factors that affect the IMR of any given country. For example, premature births in the United States have increased by more than 20% between 1990 and 2006. Preterm babies have a higher risk of complications that could lead to death within the first year of life.6 However, this does not fully explain why the United States has seen little improvement in its IMR since 2000.7
Nations differ in their immunization requirements for infants aged less than 1 year. In 2009, five of the 34 nations with the best IMRs required 12 vaccine doses, the least amount, while the United States required 26 vaccine doses, the most of any nation. To explore the correlation between vaccine doses that nations routinely give to their infants and their infant mortality rates, a linear regression analysis was performed.

Go to:
Methods and design

Infant mortality

The infant mortality rate is expressed as the number of infant deaths per 1000 live births. According to the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which keeps accurate, up-to-date infant mortality statistics throughout the world, in 2009 there were 33 nations with better infant mortality rates than the United States (Table 1).8 The US infant mortality rate of 6.22 infant deaths per 1000 live births ranked 34th.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...0327111407644/

Table 1.

2009 Infant mortality rates, top 34 nations8

RankCountryIMR1Singapore2.312Sweden2.753Japan2.794 Iceland3.235France3.336Finland3.477Norway3.588Malt a3.759Andorra3.7610Czech Republic3.7911Germany3.9912Switzerland4.1813Spain4 .2114Israel4.2215Liechtenstein4.2516Slovenia4.2517 South Korea4.2618Denmark4.3419Austria4.4220Belgium4.4421 Luxembourg4.5622Netherlands4.7323Australia4.7524Po rtugal4.7825United Kingdom4.8526New Zealand4.9227Monaco5.0028Canada5.0429Ireland5.0530 Greece5.1631Italy5.5132San Marino5.5333Cuba5.8234United States6.22
 
no new posts