Photon and Matter = Life and Death.

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
Photon and Matter = Life and Death.
=.
Why is connection between Photon and Matter is equal
to connectionbetween Life and Death ?
My explanation.
QED try to understand the interaction between photon
and matter. In1985 Richard Feynman wrote the result
of QED'ssearching :
‘ The idea of book - the interaction between light
( electromagnetic fields ) and matter is strange.
. . . . . . . . . . .
The theory ofquantum electrodynamics
describes Nature as absurd from the point of view
of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment.
So I hope you accept Nature as She is — absurd. ‘
/ book:
QED: TheStrange Theory of Light and Matter page10. /
=..
Can Nature be absurd ?
Is ourintellect or Nature absurd ?
The answer is simple: Nature is in a harmony but our
acceptation andmeaning of It is absurd.
==.
Light, quantum of light (photon) is a particle whichtakes very
important part inour life.
Theinteraction of photon with matter is possible to observe
in crystals andin vital organisms.
(every livingbeing needs light / photon.)
Now everyonethink that photon is an undeveloped particle and
it seemsnonsense to say that photon can evolve,
takinginteraction from simple to complex system and
be bearer of information/ consciousness.
But on the one hand, nobody knows what photon is.
On the other hand , photon can move with differentspeeds:
constant speedc=1 , and faster c>1, and in my opinion
can have zerospeed c=0.
( the common opinion that photon never can stop is nota law,
it is asupposition)
And if photoncan use two different inner impulses (spin)
h ( photon behaves like corpuscular )
and h*=h/2pi (photon behaves like wave )
for itsindependent movement
( it means photon itself decided how to act,
what kind of movement to do) then I say:
to take decision how to act can only a thinkingparticle.
And as in the ancient Veda is written t theconsciousness
can develop from a vague wish to a clear thought.
=.
The simplest atom hydrogen consists on proton and electron.
Electron tied with atom by the energy: E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eV.
But if someone parameter changes, then electron jumps out from
atom as aquantum of light with energy E=h*f ( itis said: electron
emits quantum oflight, but where this quantum of light is hidden
in the electron, in which pocket ?)
So, it is possible to say that atom with photon/electron is absolutely
different from atom without photon/ electron.
The atom with photon/ electron is a living system.
The atomwithout photon/ electron is a dead system.
The same is about complex and biological atoms.
===..
In the ancient Veda also is written that the Universeis consist on two
differentparticles: purusha ( a spiritual orconscious element ) and
prakrti ( a mechanical-matter particle)
The interaction between mind /consciousness elements
(purusha- photon/ electron) and matter particles (prakrti- proton )
createdeverything.
==.
There is nothing new under the Sun:
every new idea has some sort of precedent or echo fromthe past.
===..==.
All the best
Israel Socratus
===…
P.S.
I want to thank awori achoka and Philip Benjamin:
reading theircomments helped me to come to this conclusion.

=.
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
QEQ explains the interaction between light and matter.
In 1985 Richard P. Feynman wrote about QED:
‘ The idea of book - the interaction between light
( electromagnetic fields ) and matter is strange. ‘
. . . . . . .
‘ The theory of quantum electrodynamics
describes Nature as absurd from the point of view
of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment.
So I hope you accept Nature as She is — absurd. ‘
/ book:
QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter page 10. /
=====..
Everybody can choose :
What is strange and absurd the human's logical
scientific thought or Nature ?
==..
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Neither. What's absurd is abandoning logical scientific thought to seek mystical significance in things that don't align with our intuitive expectations, when there's no reason to expect that they should, they're events on a scale we did not evolve to cope with.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,404
11,454
113
Low Earth Orbit
Neither. What's absurd is abandoning logical scientific thought to seek mystical significance in things that don't align with our intuitive expectations, when there's no reason to expect that they should, they're events on a scale we did not evolve to cope with.
Would you have said the same thing to Newton who made his discoveries while on a spiritual path.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Would you have said the same thing to Newton who made his discoveries while on a spiritual path.

In my opinion he would have helped load the faggots round the stake and begged to strike the torch against tinder and burn the heretic to cinders. He suffers no mention of things spiritual but strangly adheres to energies unseen by those of us ( not evolved to cope with) condemned to the common seething masses. We must all pray that Newton does not rise again while the shadowy Sinister still lurks among us.


Photon is not only an object, it is also a subject . . . . . .
. . . . the king photon is dead, long live the king photon
=.
Quantum jumps of light recording the birth and death of a photon in a cavity
Quantum jumps of light recording the birth and death of a photon in a cavity : Abstract : Nature

===…

Isn't simultaneous objectivity and subjectivity within the same thing called consciousness?
 
Last edited:

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Would you have said the same thing to Newton who made his discoveries while on a spiritual path.
Not likely, I couldn't have known any more about his discoveries than he did, but if I'm allowed the benefit of modern knowledge in speaking to him, then yes.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Well, he did spend a lot of time mucking about with alchemy, which has a large component of mysticism, and believed to the end of his days that, despite the precision of his physics in describing how the solar system works, god intervened every now and then to tweak things. He's really the bridge between the magical mystical thinking of the mediaeval past and the modern rationalist scientific view, he had a foot firmly in both camps.
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org

The modern knowledge.
=
Einstein said:
“ One thing I have learned in along life:
that all our science, measuredagainst reality,
is primitive and childlike –
and yet it is the most preciousthing we have.”
#
‘ Since the mathematicalphysicists have taken over,
theoretical physics has gone topot.’
/ Richard Feynman./
#
. . etc , , , , ,
==..
John Polkinghorne,
Michael Talbot,
Michio Kaku,
Gury Zukav,
Fritjof Capra . . . . . etc .. . .
, , , many ( ?) have understand
'' that physicists have lost their grip onreality "
=.
I don't like mystic, I likeclearness.
And the clearness can exist onlywith a logical thought.
As a materialist i try to understand something using
physical laws and formulas.
I don't invent any new formula orequation.
Using old known formulas iexplain my own point of view on physics
Of course this interpretation looks strangeand paradoxical
from modern point of education ( which isprimitive and childlike )
but i hope that human logic will help someone (!) to solve problem :
where truth is.
===…
About 100 years ago in the letterto Einstein Sommerfeld wrote that we
have ‘Quantum mechanics’ but we don’t have ‘Quantum Philosophy.’
This situation still doesn’tchange.
=..


 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,404
11,454
113
Low Earth Orbit
Well, he did spend a lot of time mucking about with alchemy, which has a large component of mysticism, and believed to the end of his days that, despite the precision of his physics in describing how the solar system works, god intervened every now and then to tweak things. He's really the bridge between the magical mystical thinking of the mediaeval past and the modern rationalist scientific view, he had a foot firmly in both camps.
Alchemy isn't a large part of mysticism, it is mysticism. And no you don't get to judge thanks to modern knowledge because it's all about WHY. Even if he were around today, he'd still be a believer in more than what meets the eye.
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
The boundaries of Physics.
In classic physics motions are governed by Newton's laws.
Question:
how can there be motions not ( !) governed by Newton's laws?
The answer:
there are causes of motions not included in Newton's theory.
Q.: where are these causes hidden ?
A: these causes are in QT, in the microworld.
There are boundaries between Quantum and Classical physics
and the territories they share. There are eternal and infinite game
between macro and micro worlds, between life and death.
==..
 
Last edited: