Alice in Quantumland

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
Alice in Quantumland
=.
The theory of quantum electrodynamics describes Nature as absurd
from the point of view of common sense.
And it agrees fully with experiment.
So Ihope you accept Nature as She is — absurd.
/ QED : The Strange Theory of Light and Matter
page. 10. by R. Feynman /

‘ Many believe that relative theory tells us that ours
is a kind of Alice-in-Wonderland universe; that this
revealed by the mathematician Einstein who discovered
that there is a fourth dimension, . . . .. . . that, in short,
everything is relative and mysterious. ‘
/ Book ‘Albert Einstein’ , page 4. By Leopold Infeld ./

We still don't know that negative 4-D is.

In the other words:
Physicists show us the absurd and mysterious existence of nature.
==..
' But I don't want to go among mad people,' said Alice.
'Oh, you can't help that,' said the cat. 'We're all mad here.'
/ Lewis Carroll.
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. /

=
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
I think that it is possible to understand the universe
using usual common logical thought.
We need only understand in which zoo (reference frame )
physicists found higgs-boson and 1000 its elementary brothers.
socratus
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
It is impossible using particle accelerators to understand
god-particles and the ultimate truth of nature as physicists hope.
=.
To create particle accelerators is needed reference frame of vacuum.(!)
It means that physicists take vacuum as a reflector of the real (!)
structure of nature: the space between billions and billions galaxies.

But on the other hand, today's physicists refuse to take vacuum
T=0K as real fundament of Universe.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ Page 138.
By Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
=.
Question:
Does one physicist hand know that the other hand makes?
=.
( maybe without vacuum the CERN is good place for formula-I
competition . . ? ! )
=.
Socratus
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
Alice in Quantumland
an allegory of Quantum Physics

(Below is a sample from the publisher's blurb)

This story is physics told through a fantasy allegory.
Alice falls through the screen of her television set and finds herself
in Quantumland. This is a place where she encounters unusual characters
who demonstrate to her the basics of quantum physics.
She meets electrons, whose positions must be uncertain unless they are
moving rapidly
She visits the Heisenberg Bank and sees particles get short term energy loans
She talks to the Uncertain Accountant who cannot make his books balance
because of energy fluctuations.
She meets the Quantum and Classical Mechanics at the Mechanic's
Institute and sees demonstrations of interference in their Gedanken room.
At the Fermi Bose Academy she is told how the Pauli Principle deals
with hundreds of identical electron students.
From the Mendeleev Pier she explores the energy levels within an atom.
She visits Castle Rutherford, the home of the nuclear Family.
The three Quark Brothers explain the composition of strongly
interacting particles.
In all of this there is only one equation.

http://www.phy.bris.ac.uk/allegory/Alice_book.htm


The Use of Allegory
Modern physics has given rise to some strange and marvelous concepts.
They are not only strange, they are difficult to believe.
We cannot understand them, in that we cannot make them fit
with our previous beliefs.
In that sense no one understands quantum mechanics.
We are forced to take on board new and initially unbelievable facts.

http://www.phy.bris.ac.uk/allegory/allegory.htm


=======.
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
How to describe Alice's Quantumland ?
How to describe the Universe as it really is ?
=.
In his " Scientific Autobiography" Max Planck wrote :
' The outside world is something independent from man,
something absolute, and the quest for the laws which apply
to this absolute appeared to me as the most sublime scientific
pursuit in life. '
What are these ' laws which apply to this absolute ' world ?
==..
In the beginning Planck wrote, that " From young years....
the search of the laws, concerning to something absolute,
seemed to me the most wonderful task in scientist’s life."
And after some pages Planck wrote again, that
" the search for something absolute seemed to me the
most wonderful task for a researcher."
And after some pages Planck wrote again, that
“ the most wonderful scientific task for me was
searching of something absolute."
==..
And as for the relation between “relativity and absolute”
Planck wrote, that the fact of " relativity assumes the
existence of something absolute" ;
"the relativity has sense when something absolute resists it.”
Planck wrote that the phrase " all is relative " misleads us,
because there is something absolute .
And the most attractive thing was for Planck
“to find something absolute that was hidden in its foundation.”
3.
And Planck explained what there is absolute in the physics:
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy,.
b) The negative 4D continuum,
c) The speed of light quanta,
d) The maximum entropy which is possible
at temperature of absolute zero: T=0K.
==.
I think that these four Planck's points are foundation of science.
=.
socratus
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
The situation in ' philosophy of physics'.
=.
‘ Suddenly I realized that a nagual did have one point to
defend - in my opinion, a passionate defense for the
'description of the Eagle', and 'what the Eagle does'.

"But what kind of a force would the Eagle be?"

"I would not know how to answer that.
The Eagle is as real for the seers as gravity and time
are for you, and just as abstract and incomprehensible."

Those are abstract concepts, but they do refer to
real phenomena that can be corroborated. . "

He said that the Eagle's emanations are an immutable
thing-in-itself, which engulfs everything that exists;
the knowable and the unknowable.

"There is no way to describe in words what the Eagle's
emanations really are," . . . . .
. . . . . . . etc . . .
====.
/ The Fire From Within. ©1984 By Carlos Castaneda.
Chapter 03 - The Eagle's Emanations. /
http://aquakeys.com/toltec/fire-from-within-chapter_03-eagles-emanations
======..
Their dialogue is a good example for description the situation
in ' philosophy of physics' when the stupidity has a mandate
from the physicists to explain us the ‘philosophy of physics’.
==.
Socratus
=.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
So I think that the center of every galaxy is a vacuum pump since it scavenges dust from very long distances and jams them into stars after they leave on the axial jets of the galaxy.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Two helical strands one north one south, threaded together in space, both pulling dust into galactic center, pinching down as the density reaches critical and the stars are spewed out from the equator. That's near enough a vacuum pump in my opinion. It's not a black hole, it's a plasma extrusion press.
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
Two helical strands one north one south, threaded together in space,
both pulling dust into galactic center, pinching down as the density reaches critical
and the stars are spewed out from the equator. That's near enough a vacuum pump in my opinion.
It's not a black hole, it's a plasma extrusion press.


every galaxy is a vacuum pump since it scavenges dust
from very long distances and jams them into stars

both pulling dust into galactic center
/ darkbeaver /
===
Why don't say what ' dust' is 'dark matter / energy' ?
Why don't say what 'a vacuum pump ' generate this 'dust' ?

===