T. Boone Pickens is suing Ontario for $700 million

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Pickens is using his rights under the North American Free Trade Agreement to bring claims against the Canadian province of Ontario and a Florida company that has provoked his ire.

Like other investors who have challenged governments, Pickens has taken his dispute to an international court. He is seeking $700 million in damages for future losses related to bids that his wind power company, Mesa Power, lost in wind power auctions in Ontario.

Pickens and Mesa Power contend that the Florida company, NextEra, was granted exclusive access through private meetings with important government officials that ultimately tilted the bidding in its favour.

The province of Ontario granted NextEra $3.8 billion in energy contracts. Mesa Power contends that $18,600 in donations that NextEra made to the ruling Liberal Party in Ontario before elections in 2011 had undue influence on the auction.

NextEra did not respond to a request for comment.

Mesa Power’s notice of arbitration also includes allegations of favoritism toward two Korean companies, Samsung C&T and Korea Electric Power Corp., that entered a separate energy deal with the government.

Pickens says his long-running dispute is a matter of principle.

“It makes no difference whether the amount is $7 billion or $700 million,” he said. “It’s about fighting for fair and equitable treatment.”

more

Legendary Texas oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens is suing Ontario for $700 million over wind power | Financial Post
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
The North American Free Trade Agreement another gift from a former
Conservative government. They allowed international law to dictate
to a Provincial Government the rules of economic engagement. It was
a gift to transnationals at our expense. Now they are tinkering with
giving away even more rights nationally to implement the TPP. I agree
with trade but not at the expense of our own industries.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
The TPP has provisions that allow a corporation to sue Provincial and federal governments for changing or passing legislation that may effect their profit. It doesn't matter if the legislation is good for the environment or the citizens, if it possibly reduces corporate profit they can sue for all the lost potential profit. It basically gives international corporations control of our law-making process without any regard for the wishes of the citizens of this country.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
The North American Free Trade Agreement another gift from a former
Conservative government. They allowed international law to dictate
to a Provincial Government the rules of economic engagement. It was
a gift to transnationals at our expense. Now they are tinkering with
giving away even more rights nationally to implement the TPP. I agree
with trade but not at the expense of our own industries.



So, you don't have a problem with the Ontario liberals brokering deals with the peoples money under the table. Allowing favoritism because of "donations"(personally, I call that bribery). Fixing the bidding process. All of this is just fine with you.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
So, you don't have a problem with the Ontario liberals brokering deals with the peoples money under the table. Allowing favoritism because of "donations"(personally, I call that bribery). Fixing the bidding process. All of this is just fine with you.
Off course..... what they say is ...look over there....

Politics does bring out the hypocrisy in some people!
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
The North American Free Trade Agreement another gift from a former
Conservative government. They allowed international law to dictate
to a Provincial Government the rules of economic engagement. It was
a gift to transnationals at our expense. Now they are tinkering with
giving away even more rights nationally to implement the TPP. I agree
with trade but not at the expense of our own industries.

... and the Liberals were in power.

There is just one party and one person who ever promised to scrap NAFTA, R.I.P.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_MR7tL7tWs
 
Last edited:

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
The TPP has provisions that allow a corporation to sue Provincial and federal governments for changing or passing legislation that may effect their profit. It doesn't matter if the legislation is good for the environment or the citizens, if it possibly reduces corporate profit they can sue for all the lost potential profit. It basically gives international corporations control of our law-making process without any regard for the wishes of the citizens of this country.
Yup.

The North American Free Trade Agreement another gift from a former
Conservative government. They allowed international law to dictate
to a Provincial Government the rules of economic engagement. It was
a gift to transnationals at our expense. Now they are tinkering with
giving away even more rights nationally to implement the TPP. I agree
with trade but not at the expense of our own industries.
Scuse me? I thought NAFTA was from 1993/1994. ChRETIeN was Conservative?
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
The TPP has provisions that allow a corporation to sue Provincial and federal governments for changing or passing legislation that may effect their profit. It doesn't matter if the legislation is good for the environment or the citizens, if it possibly reduces corporate profit they can sue for all the lost potential profit. It basically gives international corporations control of our law-making process without any regard for the wishes of the citizens of this country.

There are some benefits to that. Helps keep greenies from passing laws that destroy the economy and take resource jobs away.

Yup.

Scuse me? I thought NAFTA was from 1993/1994. ChRETIeN was Conservative?

Grumpy hates Harper so it is all Harper's fault.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
There are some benefits to that. Helps keep greenies from passing laws that destroy the economy and take resource jobs away.

I disagree. There is zero benefit in allowing a foreign corporation to sue the taxpayer in this country because they want to profit more from our economy. They should be happy we let them operate and make money here at all. The TPP essentially allows Wal-mart to sue the Canadian citizens for billions just because we increase the minimum wage or pass legislation regarding working conditions or worker safety that adds expense to their operation. I'll pass on that agreement every time.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Maybe the taxpayers should sue the Ontario Liberal party for any costs incurred to the government.

Don't forget this can work both ways. Canadian companies can sue States for their buy America policy.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,387
11,444
113
Low Earth Orbit
Wynne/Chiarelli made the same offer to all the big winds. Sue them. They've already broke Ontarians outside GTA
The province of Ontario granted NextEra $3.8 billion in energy contracts. Mesa Power contends that $18,600 in donations that NextEra made to the ruling Liberal Party in Ontario before elections in 2011 had undue influence on the auction.
That is what he is implying.
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Legendary Texas oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens is suing Ontario for $700 million over wi

Legendary Texas oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens is suing Ontario for $700 million over wind power



T. Boone Pickens made billions drilling for oil and gas and squaring off in bare-knuckled corporate takeover bouts.

Now the 87-year-old tycoon is embroiled in what may be the last big battle of his career. Only this one is aimed thousands of miles north of his Texas home. And it is over wind power.

It is an unusual fight for the former wildcatter. Pickens is using his rights under the North American Free Trade Agreement to bring claims against the Canadian province of Ontario. And a Florida company that has provoked his ire is one that is usually on the same side as Pickens when it comes to regulation and politics — in particular, in helping Jeb Bush get elected president.

Like other investors who have challenged governments, Pickens has taken his dispute to an international court. He is seeking $700 million in damages for future losses related to bids that his wind power company, Mesa Power, lost in wind power auctions in Ontario.

Pickens and Mesa Power contend that the Florida company, NextEra, was granted exclusive access through private meetings with important government officials that ultimately tilted the bidding in its favour.

The province of Ontario granted NextEra $3.8 billion in energy contracts. Mesa Power contends that $18,600 in donations that NextEra made to the ruling Liberal Party in Ontario before elections in 2011 had undue influence on the auction.

NextEra did not respond to a request for comment.

Mesa Power’s notice of arbitration also includes allegations of favoritism toward two Korean companies, Samsung C&T and Korea Electric Power Corp., that entered a separate energy deal with the government.

Pickens says his long-running dispute is a matter of principle.

“It makes no difference whether the amount is $7 billion or $700 million,” he said. “It’s about fighting for fair and equitable treatment.”

But Mesa Power’s loss in Ontario was also personal — the projects would have been the cornerstone of a wind energy business that he extolled back home in the United States and that ultimately failed.

In other circumstances, NextEra, a sprawling energy company based in Juno Beach, Florida, has been aligned with Pickens. Both NextEra and Pickens have close ties to the Bush family and have been generous donors to Bush’s current campaign for president. And both Pickens and NextEra have at times advocated the same regulatory policy changes.

Pickens first pushed into wind power in 2007, creating Mesa Power to develop and finance wind and other renewable energy projects.

When Ontario enacted a Green Energy Act in 2009, both Mesa Power and NextEra saw an opportunity. As part of its policy change, the government created a program to provide incentives for companies to invest in renewable energy projects. Companies that were awarded contracts would be paid premium guaranteed prices set by the government. In one auction, more than 500 applications were submitted, exceeding the government’s expectations, according to statements filed with the court.

“It was a very, very attractive price,” said Cole Robertson, vice president of finance for Mesa Power, noting that the government’s set price in 2011 was double that in Texas at time.

Mesa Power submitted several project proposals through the program. But when the first rankings came out in late 2010, its executives disputed the assessments, arguing that Mesa Power’s projects should have been higher.

Ontario government officials have countered that Mesa Power did not submit its applications properly.

“In my view, many of Mesa Power’s failures were caused by its sloppiness and lack of care in preparing its application, and the consequent failure to satisfy clearly defined criteria,” said Richard Duffy, a manager of procurement at the Ontario Power Authority, the agency charged with evaluating energy project proposals, in a witness statement.

Mesa Power later disputed an auction in the spring of 2011, complaining of a lack of transparency around the process of awarding contracts and insufficient time for public consultation. Mesa Power executives wrote to Shawn Cronkwright, an official with the power authority, seeking clarification and meetings with the agency and the Ministry of Energy. Cronkwright told Mesa Power executives that these meetings would not be possible because the agency had yet to award contracts, according to court documents.

The same month that the government rejected his projects in 2011, Pickens took his case to an international tribunal, a forum where the judges are appointed by both parties in the case and a judgment can’t be appealed.

Ontario says the claims are without merit. The international tribunal is expected to rule as soon as this month.

Pickens’ lawyers argue that NextEra was able to wield influence because of its chief lobbyist, Bob Lopinski at Counsel Public Affairs. A former adviser to the Ontario premier, Dalton McGuinty, Lopinski was hired in 2010. He contacted former colleagues in the premier’s office to set up meetings for senior NextEra executives including Mitch Davidson, the chief executive. He also arranged for meetings at the Ministry of Energy and the power authority.

“Throughout this arbitration process the government of Canada has been working closely with the government of Ontario to vigorously defend this case,” said John Babcock, a spokesman for the Canadian government.

For NextEra, whose operations include electricity plants in Hawaii and wind farms in North Dakota — such political contributions are not unusual. In the United States, the company has spent millions of dollars in political donations to both the Republican and Democratic parties.

“You can’t win an election in Florida without the support of NextEra,” said William Pentland, managing partner at Brookside Strategies, an energy consulting firm. NextEra’s subsidiary, Florida Power and Light, came under criticism in 2009 when former Gov. Jeb Bush argued for rate increases for the company in an opinion piece in The Tallahassee Democrat.

Invoking rolling blackouts in Brazil at the time as a warning sign, he wrote, “It might surprise a lot of Floridians to know that our state may face a similar fate.” He added, “With power, the cash registers open and close.”

Pickens, too, has taken his share of public criticism for his business ventures. In the 1980s he waged relentless campaigns against some of the biggest oil companies like Unocal and Gulf Oil, being called a “corporate raider” and once a “soul-sucking ghoul.”

“It’s just part of the business. I never cried,” Pickens said in the interview.

With that same attitude, he abandoned his wind energy projects when the price of natural gas fell, changing his prospects for making a profit with wind energy.

“I’ve drilled dry holes before and I didn’t quit drilling wells,” Pickens said. “Wind? Sure, if the economics get right, I’ll get back in.”

For now, though, he’s back to oil and natural gas. Speaking to an audience of hedge fund managers in Las Vegas earlier this year, Pickens declared that he was about to “give up on Washington,” because of its failure to approve the construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline, a contentious cross-border project with Canada that would extract oil from the Canadian oil sands.

He’s setting his sights on Bush to make it possible. But he is keeping his options open, most recently donating $25,000 to Carly Fiorina. Pickens is also considering a donation to another Republican candidate, Ben Carson, according to a representative.

“You’ve already passed the House and the Senate,” Pickens said back in May. “So a new president would fix it.”

source: Legendary Texas oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens is suing Ontario for $700 million over wind power | Financial Post

oops

merg pls


.....................

T. Boone Pickens is suing Ontario for $700 million
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Re: Legendary Texas oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens is suing Ontario for $700 million ove

Just helpin out the terminally stupid.