Monsanto GM Seed Ban is Overturned by US Supreme Court

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
Monsanto GM Seed Ban is Overturned by US Supreme Court


Thursday, 24 June 2010 07:08



'The bio-tech company Monsanto can sell genetically modified seeds before safety tests on them are completed, the US Supreme Court has ruled. A lower court had barred the sale of the modified alfalfa seeds until an environmental impact study could be carried out. But seven of the nine Supreme Court Justices decided that ruling was unconstitutional.'
Read more: Monsanto GM Seed Ban is Overturned by US Supreme Court
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek
The Bayer company finally got the message and have withdrawn their application to sell GE rice to Brazilian farmers. The battle has taken eight long years during which time Brazilian rice farmers consistently demanded the withdrawal of all GE rice.

Bayer is battling in US court having to pay out tens of millions of dollars to rice producers affected by their contamination of the US rice supply in 2006.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
The stupidity never ceases to amaze me. GM seeds are right up there with deep sea drilling. Monsanto is a monster out of control and needs to be stopped before the world's food supply is completely under their control. If not for us, for the sake of our children and grandchildren, we need to regulate the food supply back to organic. Monsanto has already destroyed most of the diversity in the world's agricultural food supplies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: s_lone

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,404
11,454
113
Low Earth Orbit
I found some canola growing in the back lane. What happens when these plants take over from natural species in cities and grasslands? Will Monsanto pay people to physically pull these invasive species?
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
EU Votes Against Compulsory GM Food Labelling


Friday, 09 July 2010 07:47



'Consumers will continue to be none the wiser about whether they are eating food from animals raised on genetically-modified feed after MEPs voted against introducing a compulsory label rule.
There is currently no requirement on the food industry to label meat or dairy products produced using GM animal feed, usually made from GM soya or maize. However, campaigners have argued that consumers should be given a choice about whether or not to buy such produce.'
Read more: EU Votes Against Compulsory GM Food Labelling
 

Andem

dev
Mar 24, 2002
5,643
128
63
Larnaka
I found some canola growing in the back lane. What happens when these plants take over from natural species in cities and grasslands? Will Monsanto pay people to physically pull these invasive species?
They might sue the cities and private property owners for growing their GM plants without paying royalties.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
You only benefit from using Monsanto's GM plants if you're also using their Round-up herbicide. If you aren't aware that it's in your crop/garden, then I highly doubt you'd be spraying herbicide onto your plants...

Percy Schmeiser paid the costs to fight in court, the Supreme Court didn't award damages to Monsanto because Schmeiser wasn't using Round-up on what he thought was virgin rapeseed. So there was no benefit gained by having the round-up ready canola growing on his field.

If there's no chance of getting money, then litigation is just a huge expense.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek
EU Votes Against Compulsory GM Food Labelling


Friday, 09 July 2010 07:47



'Consumers will continue to be none the wiser about whether they are eating food from animals raised on genetically-modified feed after MEPs voted against introducing a compulsory label rule.
There is currently no requirement on the food industry to label meat or dairy products produced using GM animal feed, usually made from GM soya or maize. However, campaigners have argued that consumers should be given a choice about whether or not to buy such produce.'
Read more: EU Votes Against Compulsory GM Food Labelling

I'm not usually one for conspiracy theories, Stretch, but this food labelling impasse makes me wonder how many MEPs got hand-outs from Monsanto to vote they way they did. It is like hitting your head against a brick wall when trying to reign in this monstrous company. People have the right to know what they are eating and what has been fed to what they are eating. Shame on the MEPs.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,404
11,454
113
Low Earth Orbit
You only benefit from using Monsanto's GM plants if you're also using their Round-up herbicide. If you aren't aware that it's in your crop/garden, then I highly doubt you'd be spraying herbicide onto your plants...

Percy Schmeiser paid the costs to fight in court, the Supreme Court didn't award damages to Monsanto because Schmeiser wasn't using Round-up on what he thought was virgin rapeseed. So there was no benefit gained by having the round-up ready canola growing on his field.

If there's no chance of getting money, then litigation is just a huge expense.
A lot of Round Up is used around cities and railroads who haul the GM products clear across Canada to keep weeds at bay. They are invasive cultivars.

That is not what happened to Schmeiser. His landrace canola was invaded by GM canola that blew in or was **** out by birds. With landrace you still use herbicide but you use it as a pre-emergent shortly after seeding to kill the weeds which germinate and sprout long before your crop does.
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
Monsanto's Roundup - Be Warned


Tuesday, 13 July 2010 08:17



'Used in yards, farms and parks throughout the world, Roundup has long been a top-selling weed killer. But now researchers have found that one of Roundup's inert ingredients can kill human cells, particularly embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells.

The new findings intensify a debate about so-called "inerts" the solvents, preservatives, surfactants and other substances thaat manufacturers add to pesticides. Nearly 4,000 inert ingredients are approved for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.'
Read more: Monsanto's Roundup - Be Warned
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,404
11,454
113
Low Earth Orbit
Monsanto's Roundup - Be Warned


Tuesday, 13 July 2010 08:17



'Used in yards, farms and parks throughout the world, Roundup has long been a top-selling weed killer. But now researchers have found that one of Roundup's inert ingredients can kill human cells, particularly embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells.

The new findings intensify a debate about so-called "inerts" the solvents, preservatives, surfactants and other substances thaat manufacturers add to pesticides. Nearly 4,000 inert ingredients are approved for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.'
Read more: Monsanto's Roundup - Be Warned

The search for answers
MS research chair in the works

March 12, 2010
By Kris Foster
Saskatchewan has one of the highest multiple sclerosis (MS) incidence rates in Canada (and highest use of herbicide and pesticide), and that is part of the reason behind establishing the MS Clinical Research Chair in the College of Medicine.

“For every 100,000 people in Saskatchewan, 300 have MS,” said Dr. Katherine Knox, assistant professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and director of the Saskatoon MS Clinic. “It is one of the highest rates in the world.

Establishing this research chair will allow us to improve the quality of patient care and translate our research on this debilitating disease into patient treatment and potentially a cure.”

Part of the chair’s proposed research agenda will be to investigate possible new treatments or a cure for MS. Investigators in Saskatchewan are currently planning follow-up research on the findings of Dr. Paolo Zamboni, professor of medicine at the University of Ferrara in Italy, said Knox. Zamboni’s findings – being heralded as a possible cure to the disease –suggest that MS may be caused by restricted blood flow to the brain, leading to increased iron deposits that cause symptoms of the disease. There is a lot of research to be done with many new experimental treatments on the horizon, said Knox.

But before the chair and its research agenda are established, an endowment fund needs to be created, said Dr. William Albritton, dean of the College of Medicine. To that end, the university, the Saskatoon City Hospital Foundation and the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada have launched the MS Clinical Research Campaign with the goal to raise $5 million.

The endowment is a small figure when compared to the almost $1 billion MS is estimated to cost Canada each year, said Knox. “MS is a devastating disease, but Saskatchewan has a great MS research community looking for answers. We also have the facilities – Cameco MS Neuroscience Research Center and the Canadian Light Source – to advance our research.”

Another key to the program’s success is the level of clinical follow up that is possible in Saskatchewan, explained Knox. “Because migration out of Saskatchewan is low, we are able to continue long-term follow up with MS patients to determine efficacy of treatment, this is a major advantage.”

The chair, a permanent, tenure track position, will contribute to all aspects of the field, said Albritton. “This chair will be a leader in MS research, education, diagnosis and patient care, and will make Saskatchewan a leader in advancing MS treatments and discoveries.”

On Campus News (OCN) - University of Saskatchewan
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
Mounting Opposition to GMO Crops: The World’s People Reject Genetic Pollution of Food and the Environment


Tuesday, 17 August 2010 07:17



'Early Sunday morning, French police stood help less as sixty people, locked inside an open-air field of genetically modified grapevines, uprooted all the plants. In Spain last month, dozens of people destroyed two GMO fields. On the millennial cusp, Indian farmers burned Bt cotton in their Cremate Monsanto campaign. Ignored by multinational corporations and corrupt public policy makers, citizens act to protect the food supply and the planet.'
Read more: Mounting Opposition to GMO Crops: The World’s People Reject Genetic Pollution of Food and the Environment
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
TIME TO GET OFF YOU KNEES PEOPLE, ITS TIME FOR A STAND, ITS GUNNA HURT AND ITS GUNNA COST.....but to not do it is gunna hurt and gunna cost us peasants more in the long run!

Sugar Beets- Monsanto Wins Again


Wednesday, 18 August 2010 09:17



'Last Friday a federal judge imposed a nationwide ban on GMO sugar beets and it was overturned the next business day. Sugar beets comprise 50% of the sugar used in US food, and 95% of the sugar beets grown in the US are GMO. It is the jurisdiction of the US Department of Agriculture to determine whether plants are environmentally safe; this case is about whether the plants can cross pollinate (by wind, insects, etc) and contaminate other plants. This could have cost Monsanto billions of dollars.'
Read more: Sugar Beets- Monsanto Wins Again
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
There are virtually no seeds, for any commercially grown plant, that have not been genetically modified.

Any hybrid is a result of genetic modification. Nature does this all by itself, and mankind has been doing it for thousands of years. They cross pollinate grains, fruits, etc.

Some fools, mostly with absolutely NO knowledge of Botany, Chemistry or any other science, are against genetic modification because it sounds scary.

Grow up, and go get some real education, not the comic book stuff.
 

Omicron

Privy Council
Jul 28, 2010
1,694
3
38
Vancouver
I found some canola growing in the back lane. What happens when these plants take over from natural species in cities and grasslands? Will Monsanto pay people to physically pull these invasive species?
They will sue you if you *don't* physically pull those invasive species!

In the US, if farmer-A has a section downwind from a section being planted with Monsanto seed by neighbor farmer-B, and if next summer farmer-A's section starts volunteering strains that have Monsanto patented genes in it because some pollen blew from farmer-B's crop onto farmer-A's crop, then Monsanto will sue farmer-A for growing Monsanto strains without having paid Monsanto a licensing fee.