The horror of haiti: What the press coverage tells us

CHUCKMAN

New Member
Jan 20, 2006
41
3
8
January 21, 2010

THE HORROR OF HAITI: WHAT THE PRESS COVERAGE TELLS US

John Chuckman

It is relentless, the pictures of terror-stricken people, broken limbs, and bloated dead, and many of us cannot stand to see or hear more.

One has to ask: what are we to do with such information?

Create pressure on governments to keep the assistance flowing? Perhaps, but there is no shortage of assistance being sent to Haiti. There is however a huge problem in Haiti’s limited ability to absorb the assistance.

Whether it’s small and inefficient sea ports, one small and inefficient airport, a lack of decent roads, and a lack of government direction – all aspects of any place as poor as Haiti – it takes time for outsiders to come in, unload their cargoes, and organize a distribution network from scratch.

Certainly the disturbing reports and pictures are useless from the point of view of prevention. It was a natural disaster, not to be predicted, not to be prevented. One could argue that post-disaster investments could ameliorate events the next time there is an earthquake. But the kinds of images and reports being broadcast will be long forgotten if and when the world’s governments get around to re-building.

So the question for me remains, what are we to do with such information?

I am reminded of another disaster, one that happened in the last few years. It was not a “natural” disaster but the deliberate work of the immensely powerful.

In this other disaster, roughly a million people died, about five times the current estimate of death in Haiti. I don’t know how many were crippled, but it must have been a great number. This other disaster created more than two million refugees fleeing for their lives. Most of them fled to poor but generous countries, not being welcome by the rich and powerful, and especially not by the country responsible for the mayhem.

As far as pictures and reports, most of them seen in North America were sanitized. Many if not most of the reports were dishonest, clearly not informing people of the magnitude of the horror as it happened. There was a brave group of reporters who produced images every bit as terrible as those we see from Haiti, including scores of hideously mangled children.

But those pictures were not broadcast in North America, were not published in The New York Times or other newspapers “of record.” Indeed, the reporters taking these images and writing tough reports actually became targets of the forces causing all the horror.

I’m referring, of course, to the invasion of Iraq, an event whose toll of killing and damage easily compared to the dropping of a thermonuclear bomb on a good-size city.

Of course, the great and bitter irony is that that disaster was both preventable and could even have been stopped once it had started. One could almost guarantee that publication and broadcast of pictures and reports comparable to what’s now coming from Haiti would have stopped that demonic brutality. Here indeed gruesome, truthful press coverage could have made a difference, but not in Haiti.

And there was another, smaller disaster recently, smaller but still terrible, and it was completely preventable. In this one about 1,400 people died, including 400 children, and a great deal of the infrastructure of a relatively poor people was destroyed. The damage cannot even be repaired because those responsible for the horror maintain a siege on the victims, allowing no material assistance to be delivered.

Here too you likely will not have seen the kind of pictures or read the kind of stories coming out of Haiti. Some were available – I recall one of poor people trying to avoid stepping in a stream of blood flowing down a narrow street - again the work of amazingly brave reporters, but their work could only be found at not-widely known sites on the Internet. None were published or broadcast by the establishment press in North America. These events occurred in a place called Gaza.

If you think the press is objective, if you think the press does not slavishly serve the interests of the powerful, you just might want to think again.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Actually barrels are rarely replaced. It is usually just the muzzle that needs fixing as it gets worn out.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
We can think of America as a remote controlled weapon in banking hands. We have seen similar nation weapons before. When the barrel is worn out the weapon is replaced.

Replacing the weapon because of a shot or hot barrel! Are you NUTS. Dang do you not know anything about weaponry?

Swap the barrel out and then keep firing.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Ya gotta be thinking in context of military oughta' get'ems....

Nope, you got to be thinking of who pays for the adventures, who makes the fatal phonecalls and who's account swells. Right now it's national war machines for hire, the mercenary nature of warfare is well documented for this century. In a global economy the strictly national military is so passe.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Nope, you got to be thinking of who pays for the adventures, who makes the fatal phonecalls and who's account swells. Right now it's national war machines for hire, the mercenary nature of warfare is well documented for this century. In a global economy the strictly national military is so passe.

So why is the article so one-sided? There are kids presenting much better balanced articles.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
As the article notes we have had little choice but to become desensitized by the scope of death and destruction. The article asks the question of the times "what do we do with the information". That information forms the basis for macrosocial hysteria which preceeds total war, the ultimate form of social stress relief, the old tried and true uniformed inclusiveness. Flags, marching bands and stirring rhetoric all directed at the manufactured enemy by the real enemy. IMO
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
So why is the article so one-sided? There are kids presenting much better balanced articles.

An opinion piece does not have to be balanced, all the more so since the subject is injustice and imbalance itself. How in hell does anyone write a balanced piece about demonic carnage on earth? Would you want to be objective and balanced when you write about conditions in hell. Does Satan deserve a fair shake?
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
An opinion piece does not have to be balanced, all the more so since the subject is injustice and imbalance itself. How in hell does anyone write a balanced piece about demonic carnage on earth? Would you want to be objective and balanced when you write about conditions in hell. Does Satan deserve a fair shake?

It's not the demonic carnage on Earth part ... it's the bad US bad Israel thing.