I`m of the thought if all countries the US feel an easy target to bully and invade, Iran included, had their own means of defense, the world would be a dam safer place than it currently is.
--
There is also that the proliferation of such weapons could lead to terrible wars with planetary consequences such as wide spread radiation or currently exploitable territories could cease to be so i.e., they could defend themselves.

...over N. Korea`s recent decision to test some nukes?
I`m of the thought if all countries the US feel an easy target to bully and invade, Iran included, had their own means of defense, the world would be a dam safer place than it currently is.
--

The USA is a liberal democracy run by a freely elected assembly and President.

And how do we know that Kim Jung is a nut case? Because of US propaganda? Or English propaganda? How do we know that any of the boogy men of the last 100 years were as bad as the propaganda machine made them out to be? Could it be that they were vilified because they would not bow down and kiss Yanky butt? Just look at all the really nasty people that the US supported because they would kiss their butt: Pinoche, the Shaw of Iran, Marcos, Doc (what's his name) of Haiti, etc.
Gi' yor head a shake, eh! How many of you have been to North Korea to see first hand how bad this dude is?

Chances are, if the US, China and Russia are all on the same page, it ain't yankee propaganda. I understand how this little snippit of fact gives some folks trouble.

So as proof you submit that Russia and China view NK as a threat therefore it must be a real threat and not just propaganda.

Kim Jung Il is a nut case, there is not much to argue there... that isn't US propaganda.

So he is a nut case. (I know a lot of harmless nut cases right here in Nakusp.) Does that make him dangerous?

There is an exclusive club of deranged psychopaths who have nukes and they don't want anybody else to have that kind of brutal leverage. If any of these bozos can have nukes then everybody should have nukes. But no, only those who are approved Yanky butt kissers can have nukes.
And don't give me the nonsense that China is not kissing butt because right now the Chinese practically own the US's butt.

No matter how you feel about the US and its leader the North Koreans are the issue...as much as it pains folks like you.

So he is a nut case. (I know a lot of harmless nut cases right here in Nakusp.) Does that make him dangerous? There is an exclusive club of deranged psychopaths who have nukes and they don't want anybody else to have that kind of brutal leverage. If any of these bozos can have nukes then everybody should have nukes. But no, only those who are approved Yanky butt kissers can have nukes. And don't give me the nonsense that China is not kissing butt because right now the Chinese practically own the US's butt.
I'm with Scott on this one. The US is the most aggressive and dangerous nation out there and this stuff about Kim is a diversionary tactic to keep attention off the real danger.
I'm sure there will be more sanactions coming down the line.

It's not my idea, it is reality. Their first nuclear test resulted in only a censure and some meaningless sanctions from the security council. This time I'm sure it will result in a more meaningful punishment.