#1Feb 15th, 2009
OK, so why didn't it collapse like the world trade centre buildings?
Any theories?
Beijing Skyscraper Fire
#3
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolf
I don't know. Building seven was just a regular old building.Was it built the same way?
Maybe the Chinese have better steel with a higher melting point?
The Chinese building and the WTC buildings were all made of steel, we can be sure of that just because of their height.
#4
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Scott Free
They weren't hit by a plane for starters. There were a number of things that lead to the collapse of the trade centers. Fire was but one of them.
OK, so why didn't it collapse like the world trade centre buildings?
Any theories?
Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation
#6
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009
It was not built in New York City where the Mob controls the construction trade where not all the building material was put into the building that's why it's not falling
#7
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009
While I think there was something fishy about the WTC collapses, one thing to answer ScottFree's question is that in the WTC, the jet fuel has to be taken into account which would burn at a much higher temperature...
#8
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Stretch
Can you point me in the direction of some of the better WTC conspiracy sites. I need a good laugh today.no explosives were involved in this!
#9
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009
jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel
then there were the reports from emergency people about hearing and seeing explosions
but I dont want to hi- jack this thread mate, so do yourself a favour and go to 9/11 truth manifesto thread
9/11 Truth Manifesto
its all there.........
then there were the reports from emergency people about hearing and seeing explosions
but I dont want to hi- jack this thread mate, so do yourself a favour and go to 9/11 truth manifesto thread
9/11 Truth Manifesto
its all there.........
#10
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Stretch
The steel didn't melt. Only the conspiracy flakes make that claim.jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel
Quote: Originally Posted by Stretch
Confusion and conflicting reports are always a part of large disasters.then there were the reports from emergency people about hearing and seeing explosions
Quote: Originally Posted by Stretch
Then don't make silly little comments about explosives at the WTC. Leave that nonsense for the conspiracy minded circle jerks. The rest of us that want to deal in the science can discuss that aspect of it here.but I dont want to hi- jack this thread mate
#11
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Cannuck
go and read the thread....there were pools of molten metal in the basement weeks later.The steel didn't melt. Only the conspiracy flakes make that claim.
Confusion and conflicting reports are always a part of large disasters.
Then don't make silly little comments about explosives at the WTC. Leave that nonsense for the conspiracy minded circle jerks. The rest of us that want to deal in the science can discuss that aspect of it here.
#12
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Stretch
Please don't hi-jack this thread with conspiracy nonsense. Let's leave this one to those that lean toward science.go and read the thread....there were pools of molten metal in the basement weeks later.
#13
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009
Quote wotshisname >>Please don't hi-jack this thread with conspiracy nonsense. <<
I'm not, you are
I'm not, you are
#14
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Stretch
I'm not, you are
I'll ask again. Please take your conspiracy crap to your conspiracy thread. You have a thread. Leave this one for the scientific minds.
#15
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Scott Free
No 767; no jet fuel; not built in the 1960s. That's my theory.
OK, so why didn't it collapse like the world trade centre buildings?
Any theories?
#17
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 15th, 2009
.......Geez, I hope "China" wasn't trapped in there, burning to a greasy little cinder.I would sure hate to lose him and his many deep philosophical dissertations.
Has anyone seen him??
Anyone??
#18
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 16th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Stretch
No there wasn't but there was impact nonetheless. It also wasn't struck by a tidal wave nor did it suffer from crabs.there was no jet fuel or plane impact on wtc7
#19
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 16th, 2009 Quoting Scott Free
OK, so why didn't it collapse like the world trade centre buildings?
OK, so why didn't it collapse like the world trade centre buildings?
Quote:
Healthy bamboo sticks .......that's my theory .Any theories?No 767; no jet fuel; not built in the 1960s. That's my theory.
#20
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 16th, 2009
different engineering, and no large planes, full of aviation fuel, hitting building.
#21
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 16th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Cannuck
Building seven wasn't hit by a plane but it still collapsed.They weren't hit by a plane for starters.
#22
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 17th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Scott Free
Don't find that surprising at all, can imagine the impact of the towers fallingBuilding seven wasn't hit by a plane but it still collapsed.
and how that would have jolted everything around them, including the foundation of tower seven.
There is a common sense answer to those problems, it's pretty simple, one
doesn't have to have a degree in anything but a little intelligence and
maturity.
#23
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 17th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by talloola
Too much hope and faith in that for me I'm afraid.one
doesn't have to have a degree in anything but a little intelligence and
maturity.
I've seen both maturity and intelligence fail where common sense and scepticism have prevailed.
The Beijing skyscraper should have fallen too. Now a real reason needs to be found why it didn't, if nothing else then, so the knowledge can be passed onto the architects in New York.
#24
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 17th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Scott Free
No, it was hit by a building. Was the building at the beginning of this thread hit by another building?Building seven wasn't hit by a plane but it still collapsed.
#25
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 17th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Scott Free
Please regale us with your massive amounts of scientific evidence to support that statement....OK maybe massive would be too strong of a word...I guess scientific evidence would also be out....Oh hell, just point us all in the direction of one of those nutbar conspiracy sites that make this claim so we can all have a good laugh.The Beijing skyscraper should have fallen too.
Quote: Originally Posted by Scott Free
The reasons are well known and clear. You have chosen to disregard them.Now a real reason needs to be found why it didn't
#26
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 17th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Scott Free
It was hit by WTC 2 when it collapsed.Building seven wasn't hit by a plane but it still collapsed.
#27
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 17th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Cannuck
No I don't believe it was!No, it was hit by a building. Was the building at the beginning of this thread hit by another building?
#28
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 17th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Scott Free
Over and over people have pointed out reasons and the differences between but you want to believe in a conspiracy... you need to.
The Beijing skyscraper should have fallen too. Now a real reason needs to be found why it didn't, if nothing else then, so the knowledge can be passed onto the architects in New York.
What's the point.
#29
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 17th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Stretch
Yes, molten metal isn't molten steel. You don't need to melt a solid to liquid to reduce its strength and durability.go and read the thread....there were pools of molten metal in the basement weeks later.
The difference between rock hard (spoon bending) and fridge ice cream should tell you that.
#30
Re: Beijing Skyscraper Fire
Feb 17th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Zzarchov
Pointing out that fact Zzarch will be glazed over as they do whenever their theories fall flat.Yes, molten metal isn't molten steel. You don't need to melt a solid to liquid to reduce its strength and durability.
The difference between rock hard (spoon bending) and fridge ice cream should tell you that.
Similar Threads
0
Booking with HotelReservations.cx Shanghai to open world's third-tallest skyscraper
by china | Aug 29th, 2008
by china | Aug 29th, 2008
0
28