Canada votes alone for Israel


Stretch
Avatar
#1
Canada stood alone before a United Nations human rights council yesterday, the only one among 47 nations to oppose a motion condemning the Israeli military offensive in Gaza.
The vote before the Geneva-based body shows the Stephen Harper government has abandoned a more even-handed approach to the Middle East in favour of unalloyed support of Israel, according to some long-time observers.

Webmaster's Commentary:
Another government subverted by Israel.
TheStar.com | Canada | Canada votes alone for Israel
 
Socrates the Greek
Avatar
#2
Good move but I wander if there is a motive for this support. They call it Canadian Jewish votes.
I don't mean to be cynical.
 
lone wolf
#3
US would only veto any hand-slap anyhow....
 
EagleSmack
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolfView Post

US would only veto any hand-slap anyhow....

Hey Wolf...don't drag us in this thread...we're in enough already.
 
Colpy
Avatar
#5
Good for Canada! I'm proud of our stand against the majority on the Commission..........

The conduct of foreign affairs is one of the few remaining reasons to vote for the Conservative Party of Canada.
 
Risus
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by ColpyView Post

Good for Canada! I'm proud of our stand against the majority on the Commission..........

The conduct of foreign affairs is one of the few remaining reasons to vote for the Conservative Party of Canada.

Colpy, I second that!
 
darkbeaver
#7
I wonder who runs this country? It ain't Canadians.
 
tracy
#8
47 countries? That's a very small number of voters.
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
#9
The bankers have taught Canadians to piss on the paper, we're house trained puppies, we'll chase sticks all day for our masters.
 
darkbeaver
#10
Is the piss filter is broken?
 
Francis2004
Avatar
#11
If no one had supported any side I think it would have sent a stronger message to both sides to end this war.

Perhaps I am an optimist but I would love to see the day Jewish and Arab people could live in peace..

Silly me I believe in something impossible I guess..
 
lone wolf
Avatar
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by SirFrancis2004View Post

If no one had supported any side I think it would have sent a stronger message to both sides to end this war.

Perhaps I am an optimist but I would love to see the day Jewish and Arab people could live in peace..

Silly me I believe in something impossible I guess..

There have been many opportunities over the years. Things get quiet. Things get too quiet. Limelight follows drama and the attendance revenues decline. Then, someone wants Alms for Allah or Bucks for Bennie and it all heats up again....
 
Scott Free
#13
How embarrassing!
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by SirFrancis2004View Post

If no one had supported any side I think it would have sent a stronger message to both sides to end this war.

Perhaps I am an optimist but I would love to see the day Jewish and Arab people could live in peace..

Silly me I believe in something impossible I guess..

You're not a raving optimist at all Sir Francis, in fact most of recorded history indicates long periods of peaceful cohabitation accross the board only and exclusively interrupted by Zionists. In other words the long war waged by Israel is not a Jewish war it is not supported by the Jewish majority indeed Israel itself has no Jewish majority support. An Israel at peace cannot exist, it's entire reason for existence is wealth through conflict.
 
Cannuck
Avatar
#15
"But assessing yesterday's vote at the UN's human rights council, Heinbecker pointed out "the resolution is unbalanced" in its repeated condemnations of Israel."

Most of the European Countries abstained, not surprising considering the political climate there. Unlike the Jew-haters, I would actually like to read the resolution before condemning Canada for it's position.

Having said that, I have tremendous respect for Heinbecker and if he says the resolution is unbalanced...well...I tend to accept his view over those of the lesser folks.
Last edited by Cannuck; Jan 17th, 2009 at 01:19 PM..Reason: Addition
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

"But assessing yesterday's vote at the UN's human rights council, Heinbecker pointed out "the resolution is unbalanced" in its repeated condemnations of Israel."

Most of the European Countries abstained, not surprising considering the political climate there. Unlike the Jew-haters, I would actually like to read the resolution before condemning Canada for it's position.

You're applying a Zionist technique of labeling Zionist haters as Jew haters, there is a clear and important difference that you greasily skate arround. One is a sick destructive ideology and the other a religion.
 
Cannuck
Avatar
#17
As a side note, the countries that make up this council...

Angola
2010
Argentina
2011
Azerbaijan
2009
Bahrain
2011
Bangladesh
2009
Bolivia
2010
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010
Brazil
2011
Burkina Faso
2011
Cameroon
2009
Canada
2009
Chile
2011
China
2009
Cuba
2009
Djibouti
2009
Egypt
2010
France
2011
Gabon
2011
Germany
2009
Ghana
2011
India
2010
Indonesia
2010
Italy
2010
Japan
2011
Jordan
2009
Madagascar
2010
Malaysia
2009
Mauritius
2009
Mexico
2009
Netherlands
2010
Nicaragua
2010
Nigeria
2009
Pakistan
2011
Philippines
2010
Qatar
2010
Republic of Korea
2011
Russian Federation
2009
Saudi Arabia
2009
Senegal
2009
Slovakia
2011
Slovenia
2010
South Africa
2010
Switzerland
2009
Ukraine
2011
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2011
Uruguay
2009
Zambia
2011



Take out the Europeans that abstained and the rest of the group I hardly feel embarrassed for disagreeing with them on human rights grounds. If fact, I feel somewhat proud in a few instances.
 
Cannuck
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

You're applying a Zionist technique of labeling Zionist haters as Jew haters, there is a clear and important difference that you greasily skate arround. One is a sick destructive ideology and the other a religion.

..and speaking of greasily skating around the issue.
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

..and speaking of greasily skating around the issue.

You should provide your rational for your selection of the human rights arbiters, of course I know that you can't. We can easily see by way of comparing where and why death destruction and starvation occur and where fat greasy people exist by the millions on the backs of others. I suggest you know nothing about human rights violators or where they might be found.
 
Cannuck
Avatar
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

You should provide your rational for your selection of the human rights arbiters, of course I know that you can't.

... and of course you are wrong.

The people of the world are the human rights arbiters. I believe that people want to be free to live there lives as they see fit. That is why most, if given a choice, would prefer the US, Canada, Switzerland or Australia over Libya, China, Iran or Egypt. If I'm wrong (and I'm always willing to accept that possibility) then there must be a reason why Canadians, Americans and Australians are not clamoring to move to North Korea...after all, it's probably a lot cheaper to live there.
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

... and of course you are wrong.

The people of the world are the human rights arbiters. I believe that people want to be free to live there lives as they see fit. That is why most, if given a choice, would prefer the US, Canada, Switzerland or Australia over Libya, China, Iran or Egypt. If I'm wrong (and I'm always willing to accept that possibility) then there must be a reason why Canadians, Americans and Australians are not clamoring to move to North Korea...after all, it's probably a lot cheaper to live there.

Where could you have gotten that information except from the talking heads of the western coalition of death. You're a parrot for them. You believe the wreckers and strippers of the world who murder and starve indiscriminately are at the same time the beacons of human dignity and fairplay. Your delusion is complete. If you looked into the history of North Korea you would perhaps understand why they are as they are. Canadians, Americans and Austrailians are to fat and lazy to move anyplace where they haven't got Wal-Marts and 500 hundred channels of ****.
 
Cannuck
Avatar
#22
Stamping your feet or holding your breath isn't much of a debate tactic. If you can't come up with anything substantive to counter my assertion that most of the world would choose to live in Canada over North Korea, the adult thing to do would be to graciously accept that you've had your ass handed to you.
 
Risus
Avatar
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

Where could you have gotten that information except from the talking heads of the western coalition of death. You're a parrot for them. You believe the wreckers and strippers of the world who murder and starve indiscriminately are at the same time the beacons of human dignity and fairplay. Your delusion is complete. If you looked into the history of North Korea you would perhaps understand why they are as they are. Canadians, Americans and Austrailians are to fat and lazy to move anyplace where they haven't got Wal-Marts and 500 hundred channels of ****.

Well I'm Canadian, not fat or lazy, don't shop at Wal-Mart and watch maybe an hour of tv a day besides the news and the odd football game, and I am certainly not interested in moving to North Korea. I think you fall into that description you gave....
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by RisusView Post

Well I'm Canadian, not fat or lazy, don't shop at Wal-Mart and watch maybe an hour of tv a day besides the news and the odd football game, and I am certainly not interested in moving to North Korea. I think you fall into that description you gave....

An hour a day! Well that explains you. That's fifty-nine minutes longer than your small bit of grey matter can stand, its burned out your neurons Risus.
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

Stamping your feet or holding your breath isn't much of a debate tactic. If you can't come up with anything substantive to counter my assertion that most of the world would choose to live in Canada over North Korea, the adult thing to do would be to graciously accept that you've had your ass handed to you.

The thought of you touching my ass is as repulsive, I think I'll have a shower.
 
Risus
Avatar
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

An hour a day! Well that explains you. That's fifty-nine minutes longer than your small bit of grey matter can stand, its burned out your neurons Risus.

If there were good programs on tv, maybe I'd watch them. Until that happens, my grey matter is thriving, thank you.
 
darkbeaver
Avatar
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by RisusView Post

If there were good programs on tv, maybe I'd watch them. Until that happens, my grey matter is thriving, thank you.

They tell me there isn't any, better to stare at your navel or her navel.
 
gopher
#28
your Harper is about as f°°°°d up as is Bush
 
Stretch
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by gopherView Post

your Harper is about as f°°°°d up as is Bush

they both have the same puppeteer......
 
lone wolf
Avatar
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by gopherView Post

your Harper is about as f°°°°d up as is Bush

Yeah ... but you're rid of Bush in a couple of days.... I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a Harperectomy today....
 

Similar Threads

7
Canada becomes Israel
by Stretch | Feb 13th, 2009
14
Canada votes October the 14th 2008
by Socrates the Greek | Sep 22nd, 2008
no new posts