Bush says U.S. moral standing not diminished under his watch

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,609
99
48
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC

U.S. President George W. Bush gestures at the White House in Washington during his last news conference as president on Monday.

Bush says U.S. moral standing not diminished under his watch

In the final news conference of his presidency, U.S. President George W. Bush strongly dismissed suggestions that the United States lost its moral standing during his administration, insisting his most vociferous critics are few.

Bush touched on a wide range of topics during the press conference, including foreign policy, the economy, criticism of his administration, the mistakes and disappointments of his presidency and the pressures and challenges facing president-elect Barack Obama.

The president bristled when asked whether certain policies like the war in Iraq, U.S. interrogation tactics and the detention centre at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, had a negative impact on America's moral standing.

"I strongly disagree with the assessment that our moral standing has been damaged," Bush said. "It may be damaged amongst some of the elite, but people still understand America stands for freedom, that America as a country provides such great hope."

Bush pointed to Africa, India and China, where he said people have a positive view of U.S compassion and generosity.

He said it was only a few European countries that disagreed with the decision to invade Iraq. As for the countries criticizing the detention of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, he said many of them have themselves refused to accept the prisoners.

Bush said he doesn't worry about his popularity because those types of debates "will matter not if there's another attack on the homeland."

"My view is that most people around the world, they respect America," he said.

"And some of them don't like me. I understand that — some of the writers and opiners and all that. That's fine; that's part of the deal. But I'm more concerned about the country and how people view the United Sates of America."

'Mission Accomplished' slogan a mistake, Bush concedes

Bush was also asked why he sparked such passionate and personal criticism. But he rejected the notion that those critics are in the majority. He said the people he met on his travels throughout the country, including those who disagreed with him, were always civil.

"I view those who get angry and yell and say bad things and, you know, all that kind of stuff, as just a very few people in the country," Bush said.

"I don't 'see how you can get back home in Texas and look in the mirror and be proud of what I see if I allowed the loud voices, the loud critics, to prevent me from doing what I thought was necessary to protect this country."

Bush also listed a number of mistakes he believed occurred under his watch, including putting the slogan "Mission Accomplished" on an aircraft carrier shortly after Saddam Hussein was toppled from power. He also cited his attempt to reform social security immediately rather than focusing on reforming immigration.

He said the revelation of U.S. abuses at the Abu Ghraib detention camp in Iraq was a "huge disappointment" and not finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was a "significant disappointment."

Bush referred to the enormous weight on president-elect Barack Obama, describing what it might feel like on Jan. 20 when, after taking the oath of office, he enters the Oval Office for the first time as president.

"There'll be a moment when the responsibility of the president lands squarely on his shoulders," Bush said.

He said the biggest security threat facing Obama will be another attack on the United States.

"That will be the major threat," Bush said. "I wish that I could report that's not the case, but there's still an enemy out there that would like to inflict damage on America — on Americans."

By all means, share your true feelings about his responses.

Agree?

Disagree?


I'm all ears!
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Of course, he's going to try and spin something positive about his 8 years... not that anyone will believe it though.
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
</SPAN>
shrub says us moral standing not diminished under his watch! 8O

and if ya believe that, then I have a waterfront property forsale.........at low tide.:roll:
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
This man should be held accountable for authorizing an unprovoked war of agression in violation of international law. I expect he won't be brought before the IJC at the Hague any time soon. But he ranks up there with the likes of Hitler and Stalin. He won't soon be forgotten.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
This man should be held accountable for authorizing an unprovoked war of agression in violation of international law. I expect he won't be brought before the IJC at the Hague any time soon. But he ranks up there with the likes of Hitler and Stalin. He won't soon be forgotten.

Hitler and Stalin? That's a bit of stretch...
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
This man should be held accountable for authorizing an unprovoked war of agression in violation of international law. I expect he won't be brought before the IJC at the Hague any time soon. But he ranks up there with the likes of Hitler and Stalin. He won't soon be forgotten.

Translation... I'm gonna miss him...<sniff sniff>
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
70
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
This man should be held accountable for authorizing an unprovoked war of agression in violation of international law. I expect he won't be brought before the IJC at the Hague any time soon. But he ranks up there with the likes of Hitler and Stalin. He won't soon be forgotten.
No. He isn't even close to the league of Stalin and Hitler. Jeeeez. Quit giving the idiot more credit than he's due.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DurkaDurka

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
No. He isn't even close to the league of Stalin and Hitler. Jeeeez. Quit giving the idiot more credit than he's due.

Still, taking the bastard out and shooting him would not be excessive.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,609
99
48
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I think you all are going to miss him to be honest.

We all seemed to do great before he became president, I am sure we'll do just fine without him being a president.

I don't missed my family members who have died over the years, why the hell would I miss him?

(I don't mean that in a negitive manner towards those who have died in my family, I usually don't miss anybody, alive or dead..... so I don't see why I would simply miss this scum of the earth over my own family.)
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
No. He isn't even close to the league of Stalin and Hitler. Jeeeez. Quit giving the idiot more credit than he's due.

Pound for pound he's easily blamed for destruction exceeding the accomplishments of Mr Stalin and Mr Hitler combined. Of course none of them did it without help. It's not the idiot that's getting the due Gil, it's the hired hands, the backward and thus forward looking management team, the help. Somones got to get the credit for all those bodies. There's a big reward I bet.