Rice raises new doubts about Iran's nuclear program

Praxius

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,609
99
48
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
:roll:



http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080502/iran_nuclear_080502/20080502?hub=World

LONDON -- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice raised fresh doubts Thursday about the nature of Iran's nuclear program, saying if the clerical state really wanted only an avenue to peaceful atomic energy it could quickly have it.
Click to expand...

This has already been done Rice you fool.... they don't trust the US or many other western states with helping them with their nuclear program because of the West screwing them over in the past..... come on, this isn't friggin new..... this is called recycling.


Instead, Iran is stonewalling on an attractive deal to trade away only the part of the program that could result in a nuclear weapon, Rice said ahead of a gathering of the UN nations that have presented a carrot-or-stick package to Iran.


"I continue to suspect this is not at all about a civil nuclear program," Rice told reporters traveling with her. Iran's insistence that it be able to enrich uranium on its terms seems at cross-purposes with that goal, Rice said.


"One has to wonder what is going on here."


U.S. intelligence agencies concluded in a report last year that Iran shelved an active weapons-development program years ago, a finding that undercut the Bush administration's claim that Iran was using a public energy development program to hide a secret drive for a bomb. An unclassified summary of the report, known as a National Intelligence Estimate, said Iran could resume a weapons program and might evade detection if it did. Rice did not say whether she thought that had happened and did not directly accuse Iran of lying.


Iran insists its program is peaceful but says it is an affront to give up full ownership of nuclear processes that Western nations possess.
Click to expand...

Ding ding ding.... what's already been said before countless times.

..... Israel is also assumed to possess nuclear weapons and the technology that would be at least temporarily withheld from Iran under the proposed international bargain.


Analysts have suggested that Iran may be deliberately leaving ambiguities about its program as a negotiating tactic and to project strength as it competes with the United States for influence in the Middle East. Other analysts say it is probably inevitable that Iran will acquire the bomb.


Rice is meeting Friday with other permanent, veto-wielding members of the UN Security Council to discuss the next step with Iran. The session in London could be contentious, and Rice tried to play down expectations for a clear agreement on what to do next.


The U.S. was a main driver in the passage of three rounds of mild UN sanctions, the sticks that the U.S. thinks are more likely to get Iran to back down. But the U.S. has also bowed to other partners who want to try to entice Iran by offering more or better carrots. There is a potential fight brewing over what those incentives might be.


"There is a desire, I think, on the part of some participants to look again at the package we have and say, 'Is this everything we want to do in the package?'" Rice said. "I don't mind continuing to look at the package, but this is a generous package" already, she said.
Click to expand...


Look, you could send them all the Mr. Noodles in the world on top of what you're already offering and they'll still say no, because they don't trust the US or most other nations and they would rather work on it themselves where they know they can not be interfeered in their development.... COMMON SENSE PEOPLE.... this has already been explained countless times by Iran and other nations.

That's like trying to make a deal with the Soviet Union during the Cold War.... they didn't trust us as far as they could throw us, so in the same breath, why would Iran? They already figure the world's out to get them for the most part, so why would they sucker themselves into a deal that has the US's hands all over it, who's been voicing they would obliterate/destroy Iran?


The U.S. contention that Iran covertly sought a weapon was an important ingredient in winning any sanctions, and the Bush administration has scrambled since the National Intelligence Estimate findings were made public to say that Iran remains a threat. The Security Council approved the latest round of sanctions after the NIE was released.


In Washington, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, added more U.S. pressure on Iran, telling the American Jewish Committee on Thursday night that Iran's "pursuit of nuclear weapons and their pursuit of terrorism is the perfect nightmare that is a threat to Israel and the rest of the region."
Click to expand...


God Da** friggin fear mongering propaganda.... you just can't escape it. Scare the crap out of some more people without any proof or evidence why don't you?


On another issue concerning Iran, Rice said the U.S.-backed government in Iraq informed the Bush administration ahead of time about a planned face-to-face meeting with the Iranians over alleged Iranian support for militants and insurgents in Iraq.


"He is engaging his neighbor about what it would be useful to have Iran do," Rice said, referring to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom