Greenpeace activists arrested after climbing on top of plane


harleyhunny
#31
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

so in otherwords....you're full of shyte...... Wolf has already admitted that it wasn't GreenPeace spiking trees in BC....yet you continue on with your baseless and brainless diatribe.

Your parents would be so proud, you turned out just like them I suppose. At least you did not build up any hopes.

Funny it was Green peace that admitted to it, maybe it was an affiliate. Anyways they are all fanatical welfare collecting bums. Give them a job, and they may be busy with a life, and their own one at that, and they would not have time to destruct others. And who the hell are they to tell others how to live. Do you? Do you like someone to tell you how to live, think, eat, etc. Probably do. But I have a mind of my own,and no one tells me what to do, how to do it, where,when or why?
 
harleyhunny
#32
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

SO you STILL can't back up YOUR cowardly assertions....and that's what they be if ya can't back em up. So....either back em up....or shut the f*ck up.....one or the other mouth peice.

Typical tough guy on a computer. Amazing how anonymity can make some feel like a rea man. Why don't you go blow a goat. As I said I am not your shrinking violet type little man. So why don't you make me.
 
Tonington
Avatar
#33
Quote: Originally Posted by harleyhunnyView Post

Dios maria I think you need to take more time. It was you who said IF A FEW, does bold letters help? A few meaning you are okay with a few, just not all. How nice of you. For some it is okay. You should clear your head. You're wrong.

I never once said few. If your eyes aren't working well, go back and use CTRL + F .

I agreed that it's criminal for crying out loud. Grow up.
 
gerryh
Avatar
#34
Quote: Originally Posted by harleyhunnyView Post

Your parents would be so proud, you turned out just like them I suppose. At least you did not build up any hopes.

Funny it was Green peace that admitted to it, maybe it was an affiliate. Anyways they are all fanatical welfare collecting bums. Give them a job, and they may be busy with a life, and their own one at that, and they would not have time to destruct others. And who the hell are they to tell others how to live. Do you? Do you like someone to tell you how to live, think, eat, etc. Probably do. But I have a mind of my own,and no one tells me what to do, how to do it, where,when or why?


Ok....so I'll just put everything you write down to something you've blown out your a$$.
 
lone wolf
Avatar
#35
Quote: Originally Posted by harleyhunnyView Post

I am not gullible enough to take what some fanatic on here says to be the end all.
Wolf does not debate he comes on with pathetic insults. lacks anything pertinent to say. So what,his problem not mine.

Debate what???? How does one debate the stupid accuations of someone who doesn't even know what they're talking about? This is a forum ... NOT the fight club. Act respectible and you'll be treated with respect. Act like some spoiled biker bi*ch and that's what you'll get.

B-bye....

Woof!
 
harleyhunny
#36
Quote: Originally Posted by ToningtonView Post

I never once said few. If your eyes aren't working well, go back and use CTRL + F .

I agreed that it's criminal for crying out loud. Grow up.

I am taking it from the fact that you said if all. So I ask if a few are doing it, is it okay? By your way of thinking YES!.
Read between the lines. Or are you old enough?
 
harleyhunny
#37
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolfView Post

Debate what???? How does one debate the stupid accuations of someone who doesn't even know what they're talking about? This is a forum ... NOT the fight club. Act respectible and you'll be treated with respect. Act like some spoiled biker bi*ch and that's what you'll get.

B-bye....

Woof!

biker bi*ch . Now there is some mature logic. uhuh. I suggest pig you take your own advise. Practise what you preach or go blow a goat. Stalking now are we. Or is that trolling, it suits. And please at least have the guts to stick to your little farewell, chico.
I am not accusing I am stating a fact and I do not have to show you any little links to go with it. I do not like green peace, and think they are useless paragons of society that need to half their nuts curtailed, charged accordingly. They are radicals with no cause, but harm to those that to not convert to there way of thinking, kinda of like Hitler.
 
Tonington
Avatar
#38
Quote: Originally Posted by harleyhunnyView Post

I am taking it from the fact that you said if all. So I ask if a few are doing it, is it okay? By your way of thinking YES!.
Read between the lines. Or are you old enough?

Right, read back a little more. Are you saying all Greenpeace are putting spikes in trees? That was what I took contention with. Do you always speak in generalizations and broad statements?

Can you read the multiple times I agreed it's criminal?

Can you engage in conversation without making assumptions that betray your asinine mannerisms?

Will you be on this forum much longer with your poor attitude?

Are you big enough to see that I agreed with you in part, and you're picking a fight where there is none?

Are you here just to be combative?

What is your major malfunction?
 
lone wolf
Avatar
#39
Quote: Originally Posted by harleyhunnyView Post

biker bi*ch . Now there is some mature logic. uhuh. I suggest pig you take your own advise. Practise what you preach or go blow a goat. Stalking now are we. Or is that trolling, it suits. And please at least have the guts to stick to your little farewell, chico.
I am not accusing I am stating a fact and I do not have to show you any little links to go with it. I do not like green peace, and think they are useless paragons of society that need to half their nuts curtailed, charged accordingly. They are radicals with no cause, but harm to those that to not convert to there way of thinking, kinda of like Hitler.

And which advice is it I should take? Better judgement tells me to ignore you and wait. Your name will be the next one written in blood on our boards. Really, a walking attitude simply is not worth the time it takes for a polite response. I'm sure you're well aware that time is money.

The advice I am following is:

DON'T FEED THE TROLL



Woof!
Last edited by lone wolf; Feb 25th, 2008 at 08:53 PM..
 
Praxius
Avatar
#40
Quote: Originally Posted by harleyhunnyView Post

Typical tough guy on a computer. Amazing how anonymity can make some feel like a rea man.

Indeed, look in the mirror for once.

Quote:

Why don't you go blow a goat. As I said I am not your shrinking violet type little man. So why don't you make me.

And how about you get back on topic or take a flying leap into a cactus. I'm getting personally sick and tired of your personal attacks hi-jacking threads which were actually worthwhile once apon a time.

Either stick to the damn topic or leave.

Now, does anybody else have anything worthwhile to contribute to the topic?
 
lone wolf
Avatar
#41
Rainbow Warrior at rest at peaceful anchor in a nuclear test zone was a statement.

Then they got silly - ramming tankers and painting seals green (wonder if the paint was non-toxic)

Rainbow Warrior at rest on the bottom of a New Zeland harbour was another statement.

Woof!
 
Praxius
Avatar
#42
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolfView Post

Rainbow Warrior at rest at peaceful anchor in a nuclear test zone was a statement.

Then they got silly - ramming tankers and painting seals green (wonder if the paint was non-toxic)

Rainbow Warrior at rest on the bottom of a New Zeland harbour was another statement.

Woof!

Yeah that kind of bugs me that they're about as distructive as those they are trying to fight, usually causing more damage then they prevent.
 
gerryh
Avatar
#43
Quote: Originally Posted by PraxiusView Post

Yeah that kind of bugs me that they're about as distructive as those they are trying to fight, usually causing more damage then they prevent.


and I think that is one of the reason's one of GP's founders left the fold.
 
Praxius
Avatar
#44
Oh, those fools are back at it again:



Heathrow protesters turn up on UK parliament's roof
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...0227?hub=World

Quote:

LONDON -- Demonstrators climbed onto the roof of Britain's Houses of Parliament today to protest plans to build a third runway at London's Heathrow Airport.

Members of the group Plane Stupid reached the roof despite supposedly tight security at the Parliament buildings, including armed police guards.

Protesters threw paper airplanes from the roof and unfurled a banner declaring "No Third Runway.''

Police say five people have since been led down from the roof and detained. Officers say they are likely to be charged with trespassing, although protests at Parliament not cleared in advance are also banned under anti-terrorism laws.

Richard George, one of the demonstrators, said the protesters wanted to highlight what they called weak leadership from Prime Minister Gordon Brown over the impact of aviation on climate change.

Oh wow, how artistic of them

Quote:

"The prime minister does not even have the courage to ask Londoners the simple question: 'Do you want a third runway?''' George said by cellphone from the rooftop.

That's because he doesn't have to you moron. The public do not own the airport and the airport can do wtf ever they want on their property. Get over yourselves. And regardless, that's what representatives are elected for... protest their offices until they make change or don't vote for them next election.... get a brain.

Quote:

Brown denounced the protest during his weekly questions session in the Commons.

"The message should go out today very clearly that decisions in this country should be made in the chamber of this house and not on the roof of this house,'' he said.

George said the group gained access to Parliament as visitors, who must be invited by a legislator or accompanied by a security pass holder. They then walked through the building and went to a roof.

"We went up in a lift and walked out onto the roof. It was as simple as that,'' George said.
Brown's spokesman, Michael Ellam, said the government backs a third runway for Heathrow.

"The government supports the third runway at Heathrow in principle, provided strict environmental and noise conditions are met,'' Ellam said.

But he declined to comment on the apparent security breach.

"It's not clear what the full facts are at this point,'' he said. "Parliamentary security is a matter for the House authorities.''

The parliamentary department responsible for security said it could not immediately explain how the protesters were able to carry out the demonstration. Police said they were investigating the security breach.

Security in the Houses of Parliament -- home to both the House of Commons and the House of Lords -- has been tightened following a spate of intrusions in recent years.

Otis Ferry, son of rock star Bryan Ferry, and seven other men sneaked into the Commons chamber in 2004 in a pro-fox hunting protest. Months earlier, fathers' rights campaigners hurled purple powder at then-prime minister Tony Blair from the public gallery.

Sounds more like they're milking this thing for their own celebrity status in the media.... numb skulls.

Seriously.... did they actually think when they were going to do this "Oh, this will make change happen. They'll take us seriously now..... people will take notice"

Yeah, we took notice, that you're idiots.
 
lone wolf
Avatar
#45
Does any one of those attention-seekers realize their paper airplanes fly better than a body? Note the absence of harnass.

Woof!
Last edited by lone wolf; Feb 27th, 2008 at 02:02 PM..
 
no new posts