Satelitte Radio Addict
Posts: 869 
Location: Toronto, ON
Location: Toronto, ON
June 2nd, 2007, 01:33 AM
In theory, nobody should be drunk. It is the Drive-Through window.
Has Tim Horton's made a statement or taken disciplanary action? Seems to me that such a sign would not be corporate policy. A boycot would serve what purpose? Has anybody asked them to take the sign down?
In theory, nobody should be drunk. It is the Drive-Through window.
Has Tim Horton's made a statement or taken disciplanary action? Seems to me that such a sign would not be corporate policy. A boycot would serve what purpose? Has anybody asked them to take the sign down?
Time Out
Posts: 188
June 2nd, 2007, 02:04 AM
maybe they'll put in fine print, as an afterthought, "or white people", to hedge their position. but as doug has pointed out, being drunk in a drive-thru is a no-go to begin with. If you're driving drunk you're an idiot, so the sign should plainly state 'No Drunken Idiots - period!'
Dave on the other hand, is like, drunk driving through life, with no consideration for anyone else whatsoever. Some Buddhist. riiiiiiiiiiiiiight grasshopper
\
maybe they'll put in fine print, as an afterthought, "or white people", to hedge their position. but as doug has pointed out, being drunk in a drive-thru is a no-go to begin with. If you're driving drunk you're an idiot, so the sign should plainly state 'No Drunken Idiots - period!'
Dave on the other hand, is like, drunk driving through life, with no consideration for anyone else whatsoever. Some Buddhist. riiiiiiiiiiiiiight grasshopper
\
