The Evidence is in

Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
Professor Steven Jones presenting his X-ray spectrometry evidence from samples taken at the WTC site. They dramatically show a PERFECT MATCH for the highly specialized compound "thermate" (used for cutting through steel) found in the WTC debris. (And no, thermate was NOT used during the clean up operation...this stuff was in the building, and ignited, prior to collapse.)
Posted Apr 23, 2007 07:15 PM PST
Category: 911
http://stopthelie.com/the_evidence_is_in.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: darkbeaver
P

Pangloss

Council Member
Mar 16, 2007
1,535
41
48
Calgary, Alberta
Stretch:

For your own sake - please stop being so gullible. And no, I'm not interested in a debate about this - WTC conspiracies are the insanity that will never, it seems, just go away.

Pangloss
 
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
Pangloss said:
Stretch:

For your own sake - please stop being so gullible. And no, I'm not interested in a debate about this - WTC conspiracies are the insanity that will never, it seems, just go away.

Pangloss
Click to expand...
I'm fine, thanks very much for asking......
there's nothing to debate, really....and it's only a conspiracy till it becomes a fact, mate.
 
Last edited:
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
I'm on dial-up was hoping you could tell me....IT'S A CONSPIRACY"!!!!!
lol
gunna go over to me friends place and check it out
 
Dexter Sinister

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
There's nothing new in either of those videos, insofar as they're comprehensible, nothing that hasn't been adequately and credibly explained elsewhere. You still don't have anything like a reasonable case.
 
#juan

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
It would be interesting to know why the thermate was there though. I'm not a chemist so I don't know of any explanation why the stuff would show up on the spectrometry results if the substance wasn't there. If there is an explanation, I'd like to hear it.
 
Dexter Sinister

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
There's no proof that thermate was there. What's there are residues consistent with the presence of thermate in the fires, but they're also consistent with the presence of a whole lot of more likely things.
 
#juan

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Dexter Sinister said:
There's no proof that thermate was there. What's there are residues consistent with the presence of thermate in the fires, but they're also consistent with the presence of a whole lot of more likely things.
Click to expand...

I was under the impression that thermate was a complicated substance. With a little research I've found that thermate is just thermite(iron oxide and aluminium powder) that has been enriched with sulphur. Apparently, the gyprock used in the WTC contained sulphur. In the topic header professor Jones claims to have found a "perfect match" for thermate. If he means that he found all the elements that are contained in thermate, that is somewhat different, and in line with what you are saying.
 
Dexter Sinister

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Yeah, thermate and thermite are both pretty simple substances. One thing Professor Jones did *not* find in the WTC samples was thermate itself, and he couldn't have of course, it would have been burned up if it were there. I also read in something I found this afternoon that sulphur is no longer used in thermate, there are better options that don't make such a bad smell as burning sulphur, though the piece didn't say what's used in place of sulphur so I'm not sure what to make of that claim. Thermate, according to what I read, is mainly a military incendiary, used in things like grenades. It's just a fire starter, not an explosive, and if that's so I doubt it'd be the product of choice for controlled demolition of buildings.
 
Stretch

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
17 Search Results from WhatReallyHappened.com
Thermite And A Controlled Demolition Of The World Trade Center.
Posted Apr 15, 2007
Thermite And A Controlled Demolition Of The World Trade Center....


WTC7, Professor Jones & Thermite
Posted Feb 23, 2007
WTC7, Professor Jones & Thermite...


Thermite and the WTC Collapses
Posted Nov 15, 2006
Thermite and the WTC Collapses...


In honor of our veterans, we call for truth
Posted Nov 14, 2006
We invite every single American daily newspaper to join us in our demand for an independent council to completely and thoroughly investigate the deaths of nearly 3,000 American citizens in the attacks of 9/11.


9/11 Truth: Thermite & The Case for Controlled Demolition
Posted Oct 6, 2006
9/11 Truth: Thermite & The Case for Controlled Demolition...


Banned From The Classroom: 911 Physics Scientist Who Proved Thermite Involved In WTC Demolitions
Posted Sep 18, 2006
Like a modern-day Galileo or Socrates, the highly respected physicist, who has challenged with logic and scientific evidence the official explanation for the "collapse" of the World Trade Center, has been banned from teaching classes at his university.


9-11 5 years later: Thermite and the WTC Collapses
Posted Sep 10, 2006
9-11 5 years later: Thermite and the WTC Collapses...


Evidence of Thermite on Core Columns at WTC
Posted May 18, 2006
Evidence of Thermite on Core Columns at WTC...


Evidence of Thermite Uncovered at World Trade Center
Posted May 2, 2006
AFP contacted three scientists who support the official theory to ask if they would review Jones’s paper. Thomas W. Eagar of MIT refused to even look at the paper and said there is no evidence of molten metal pouring from the WTC. Challenged with the evidence, he hung up the phone.



Thermite Identified As Culprit Of WTC Collapse
Posted Apr 24, 2006
Thermite Identified As Culprit Of WTC Collapse...


Evidence of Thermite on Core Columns at WTC
Posted Apr 23, 2006
Evidence of Thermite on Core Columns at WTC...


Physicist says heat substance felled WTC
Posted Apr 10, 2006
A Brigham Young University physicist said he now believes an incendiary substance called thermite, bolstered by sulfur, was used to generate exceptionally hot fires at the World Trade Center on 9/11, causing the structural steel to fail and the buildings to collapse.


9/11 Rescuer Saw Explosions Inside WTC 6 Lobby
Posted Feb 11, 2006
9/11 Rescuer Saw Explosions Inside WTC 6 Lobby...


Aluminium and Fire
Posted Dec 4, 2005
Because of the widespread use of aluminium alloys in building, transport, home appliances and offshore structures, it is necessary to address the issue of aluminium and fire and to answer the question, 'does aluminium burn?'. The answer is, of course, "No". Each year hundreds of thousands of tonnes of aluminium scrap are fed into remelt furnaces and heated up to and beyond the melting point. The aluminium melts when the temperature exceeds the melting point, it does not burn. If it did, the recycling of aluminium would not be possible.



Thermite and the WTC Collapses
Posted Nov 16, 2005
Thermite and the WTC Collapses...


Thermite and the World Trade Center Collapses
Posted Dec 28, 2003
Thermite and the World Trade Center Collapses...


Calculations on the Possible Use of Thermite to Melt Sections of the WTC Core Columns
Posted Nov 26, 2003
Calculations on the Possible Use of Thermite to Melt Sections of the WTC Core Columns...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom