Gay rights bill 'threatens hotel'

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Talk about double standards...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lancashire/6322075.stm

Gay rights bill 'threatens hotel'



Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation will be outlawed

A hotelier who runs a gay-only guest house has said the government's anti-discrimination bill would be a step backward for gay rights.
The Sexual Orientation Regulations (SORs), which are due to come into effect in April, outlaw discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
Mark Hurst, 47, said the proposed legislation would force him to open his doors to heterosexual guests.
He said that may put off many of his gay guests and put him out of business.
Mr Hurst, who runs Guyz hotel in Blackpool with his partner Steve, said: "Rather than improve gay rights, it will make things much worse. We run a gay hotel exclusively for men.
It's very unlikely there are going to be hundreds of heterosexuals banging on the doors of gay hotels



Peter Tatchell


"We feel if we were forced to a situation where we had to accept heterosexual people into our hotel, our gay clientele will not behave as naturally as they would now.
"Many of them would feel more self-conscious. Many of our guests like to just sit on the settee in the lounge and cuddle up to watch a film.
"They can hold hands and have a little kiss and would behave in a way they may not if they were in a mixed crowd," he said.
Gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said Mr Hurst was making a fuss over nothing.
He said: "I think this is a bit of storm in a teacup.
"Just as there aren't going to be hundreds of gay couples descending on Catholic adoption agencies, I think it's very unlikely there are going to be hundreds of heterosexuals banging on the doors of gay hotels demanding to be let in."
The regulations have applied in Northern Ireland since 1 January and are due to be implemented in England, Wales and Scotland by April.
 

thomaska

Council Member
May 24, 2006
1,509
37
48
Great Satan
Talk about double standards...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lancashire/6322075.stm

Gay rights bill 'threatens hotel'



Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation will be outlawed


A hotelier who runs a gay-only guest house has said the government's anti-discrimination bill would be a step backward for gay rights. The Sexual Orientation Regulations (SORs), which are due to come into effect in April, outlaw discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
Mark Hurst, 47, said the proposed legislation would force him to open his doors to heterosexual guests.
He said that may put off many of his gay guests and put him out of business.
Mr Hurst, who runs Guyz hotel in Blackpool with his partner Steve, said: "Rather than improve gay rights, it will make things much worse. We run a gay hotel exclusively for men.
It's very unlikely there are going to be hundreds of heterosexuals banging on the doors of gay hotels



Peter Tatchell


"We feel if we were forced to a situation where we had to accept heterosexual people into our hotel, our gay clientele will not behave as naturally as they would now.
"Many of them would feel more self-conscious. Many of our guests like to just sit on the settee in the lounge and cuddle up to watch a film.
"They can hold hands and have a little kiss and would behave in a way they may not if they were in a mixed crowd," he said.
Gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said Mr Hurst was making a fuss over nothing.
He said: "I think this is a bit of storm in a teacup.
"Just as there aren't going to be hundreds of gay couples descending on Catholic adoption agencies, I think it's very unlikely there are going to be hundreds of heterosexuals banging on the doors of gay hotels demanding to be let in."
The regulations have applied in Northern Ireland since 1 January and are due to be implemented in England, Wales and Scotland by April.

:laughing7:

I bet the Saturday Night Live crew could make a great sketch about this!

Better yet, Carlos Mencia...
 
Last edited:

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
We've had the BC case lately where a man insisted he should be able to join a Women's Fitness Club so why not this? It has to be a two way street.
 

canadarocks

Electoral Member
Dec 26, 2006
233
6
18
We've had the BC case lately where a man insisted he should be able to join a Women's Fitness Club so why not this? It has to be a two way street.

Why would he want to join a woman's fitness club? The whole idea of joining one is to avoid being with men well exercising.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Why would he want to join a woman's fitness club? The whole idea of joining one is to avoid being with men well exercising.

women have for, decades now, beaten down the doors of every 'men only' establishment in the name of gender equality. Why shouldn't men do the same? If everyone is equal, then everyone is equal, no exceptions.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Why would he want to join a woman's fitness club? The whole idea of joining one is to avoid being with men well exercising.

The whole point of a Men's only golf club is to avoid being with women while golfing.

Change is a two way street, but not here in Canada.
 

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
45
Newfoundland!
i notice this guy says it'd be a step backwards for gay rights, and yet what it'll really be is a step backwards for his own profits. that's the only reason he's bothered.