Gay rights bill 'threatens hotel'


DurkaDurka
Avatar
#1
Talk about double standards...

--

Gay rights bill 'threatens hotel'



Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation will be outlawed

A hotelier who runs a gay-only guest house has said the government's anti-discrimination bill would be a step backward for gay rights.
The Sexual Orientation Regulations (SORs), which are due to come into effect in April, outlaw discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
Mark Hurst, 47, said the proposed legislation would force him to open his doors to heterosexual guests.
He said that may put off many of his gay guests and put him out of business.
Mr Hurst, who runs Guyz hotel in Blackpool with his partner Steve, said: "Rather than improve gay rights, it will make things much worse. We run a gay hotel exclusively for men.
It's very unlikely there are going to be hundreds of heterosexuals banging on the doors of gay hotels


Peter Tatchell


"We feel if we were forced to a situation where we had to accept heterosexual people into our hotel, our gay clientele will not behave as naturally as they would now.
"Many of them would feel more self-conscious. Many of our guests like to just sit on the settee in the lounge and cuddle up to watch a film.
"They can hold hands and have a little kiss and would behave in a way they may not if they were in a mixed crowd," he said.
Gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said Mr Hurst was making a fuss over nothing.
He said: "I think this is a bit of storm in a teacup.
"Just as there aren't going to be hundreds of gay couples descending on Catholic adoption agencies, I think it's very unlikely there are going to be hundreds of heterosexuals banging on the doors of gay hotels demanding to be let in."
The regulations have applied in Northern Ireland since 1 January and are due to be implemented in England, Wales and Scotland by April.
 
eh1eh
Avatar
#2
Oh ya. All he has to do is keep the pink sign out front, should keep the breeders away.
 
thomaska
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by DurkaDurkaView Post

Talk about double standards...

--

Gay rights bill 'threatens hotel'



Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation will be outlawed

A hotelier who runs a gay-only guest house has said the government's anti-discrimination bill would be a step backward for gay rights. The Sexual Orientation Regulations (SORs), which are due to come into effect in April, outlaw discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
Mark Hurst, 47, said the proposed legislation would force him to open his doors to heterosexual guests.
He said that may put off many of his gay guests and put him out of business.
Mr Hurst, who runs Guyz hotel in Blackpool with his partner Steve, said: "Rather than improve gay rights, it will make things much worse. We run a gay hotel exclusively for men.
It's very unlikely there are going to be hundreds of heterosexuals banging on the doors of gay hotels


Peter Tatchell


"We feel if we were forced to a situation where we had to accept heterosexual people into our hotel, our gay clientele will not behave as naturally as they would now.
"Many of them would feel more self-conscious. Many of our guests like to just sit on the settee in the lounge and cuddle up to watch a film.
"They can hold hands and have a little kiss and would behave in a way they may not if they were in a mixed crowd," he said.
Gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said Mr Hurst was making a fuss over nothing.
He said: "I think this is a bit of storm in a teacup.
"Just as there aren't going to be hundreds of gay couples descending on Catholic adoption agencies, I think it's very unlikely there are going to be hundreds of heterosexuals banging on the doors of gay hotels demanding to be let in."
The regulations have applied in Northern Ireland since 1 January and are due to be implemented in England, Wales and Scotland by April.



I bet the Saturday Night Live crew could make a great sketch about this!

Better yet, Carlos Mencia...
Last edited by thomaska; Feb 2nd, 2007 at 11:26 AM..
 
tamarin
#4
We've had the BC case lately where a man insisted he should be able to join a Women's Fitness Club so why not this? It has to be a two way street.
 
eh1eh
Avatar
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by thomaskaView Post



I bet the Saturday Night Live crew could make a great sketch about this!

Better yet, Carlos Mencia...

Just sent the idea to Lorne Michaels. If you want Mencia to do it you can send it. He's not funny.
 
canadarocks
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by tamarinView Post

We've had the BC case lately where a man insisted he should be able to join a Women's Fitness Club so why not this? It has to be a two way street.

Why would he want to join a woman's fitness club? The whole idea of joining one is to avoid being with men well exercising.
 
karrie
Avatar
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by canadarocksView Post

Why would he want to join a woman's fitness club? The whole idea of joining one is to avoid being with men well exercising.

women have for, decades now, beaten down the doors of every 'men only' establishment in the name of gender equality. Why shouldn't men do the same? If everyone is equal, then everyone is equal, no exceptions.
 
Zzarchov
Avatar
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by canadarocksView Post

Why would he want to join a woman's fitness club? The whole idea of joining one is to avoid being with men well exercising.

The whole point of a Men's only golf club is to avoid being with women while golfing.

Change is a two way street, but not here in Canada.
 
L Gilbert
#9
--
Tough. Can't please everyone.
 
hermanntrude
Avatar
#10
i notice this guy says it'd be a step backwards for gay rights, and yet what it'll really be is a step backwards for his own profits. that's the only reason he's bothered.
 
sanctus
Avatar
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

--
Tough. Can't please everyone.

Indeed! One thing about homosexual advocacy groups, which is common to all fringe advocacy groups, is they bitch if you don't kow-tow to their requests and bitch about how you do.
 
sanctus
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by hermanntrudeView Post

i notice this guy says it'd be a step backwards for gay rights, and yet what it'll really be is a step backwards for his own profits. that's the only reason he's bothered.

Same thing I was thinking!
 
hermanntrude
Avatar
#13
i suspect, though, that his hotel will continue to be used, and other hotels will continue to discriminate on a low-key scale.
 

Similar Threads

1
Canada's veterans get bill of rights
by CBC News | Apr 3rd, 2007
21
Canadian Bill of Rights and Separatism
by canadapledge | Jun 28th, 2005
no new posts