King Kofi Bids Adieu

#1 (external - login to view)
Sour Send-off For Hated Annan

December 16, 2006 -- NEXT week's farewell bash for United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan may be more like a wake than a party.
Sources tell Page Six the outgoing Ghana-born leader has infuriated so many people during his reign that his Tuesday farewell gala at the U.N. could be noticeably under-attended. "He's so detested it will be interesting to see who doesn't show," a source says.
Among those bitter at Annan are 7,000 members of the U.N. Staff Union in New York. He has refused to schedule an official goodbye meeting with them to discuss their concerns, offering to hold only an "informal encounter in the U.N. cafeteria," union vice president Emad Hassanin told Issues include early retirements, budget cuts and charges of sexual harassment by senior U.N. officials.
Also not expected to show is outgoing U.N. Ambassador John Bolton, who's also said to be skipping the swearing-in ceremony of new U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.
Earlier this year, Bolton showed his solidarity with the union by meeting with leaders to discuss reforming the U.N. bureaucracy. Later, NewsMax reports, Bolton said he had "more in common with the staff union than he had with the 38th floor," where Annan's office is located.
The U.N.'s human resources department contemplated firing the staffers who met Bolton, but later backed down.
Others are mad that Annan reportedly plans to exit his position 11 days early so he can get a jump start on his Christmas holiday - a decision that may impact the fate of two Israeli soldiers captured by Hezbollah last July. Under terms of a U.N. Security Council brokered cease-fire, Annan was directed to secure the release of the two Israeli soldiers, NewsMax reports. When Annan does leave, he'll have a comfy financial cushion to lean on, collecting a $14,000-a-month pension from his secretary general stint. He'll also get an additional $8,000 a month accrued from his early days at the U.N. when he ran human resources, served as controller and was head of peacekeeping operations.

$14,000/month plus $8,000 PLUS the Oil for Food money he has salted away no doubt in Switzerland.
Maybe he can buy a kingship in a European nation for himself. It's what he believes of himself.

I wonder if this Union group were the ones who went on strike a few years back and closed down all the eating establishments in the U.N. on a Friday at noon - the "delegates of diplomacy" broke in and stole everything not nailed down..... lovely group. Bye Kofi - watch that door slamming....

His adoring public:
#2 (external - login to view)

Kofi's stain
UN chief wronged U.S., coddled
dictators and ignored corruption

Some people go out in style. On Monday, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan bade farewell by biting the American hand that has fed him for the last decade. Kofi's American swan song, delivered at the Truman Library in Missouri, was a condescending piece of finger-wagging from a discredited diplomat who can barely disguise his contempt for American foreign policy.
One low-light: his declaration that Washington's position in the "vanguard of the global human-rights movement...can only be maintained if America remains true to its principles, including in the struggle against terrorism. When it appears to abandon its own ideals and objectives, its friends are naturally troubled and confused."
This from a man who blithely allowed the biggest financial scandal of modern times, the multibillion-dollar Oil-for-Food debacle, and blinded himself to human-rights violators throughout Asia, Africa and the Middle East.
Amazingly, some U.S. political leaders still defend Annan's leadership. Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) praised him as a man who served with "grace, humor, determination, always doing what he felt was in the best interest of mankind." And Annan has long been a darling of the American left. In 2002, media mogul Ted Turner famously remarked that Annan "has the toughest job in the world and everybody loves him. He doesn't make anybody mad at him, not even Saddam Hussein."
But Annan has been no friend of the American people, or of the Iraqi people. At every opportunity, he has undermined U.S. global leadership, most recently making a habit of deriding America's decision to remove Saddam from power as "illegal." People of good will can debate whether that decision was right or wrong - but it was Saddam, not Bush, who thumbed his nose at a dozen UN resolutions and systematically oppressed the Iraqi people.
Annan has a long track record of cozying up to dictators. He has consistently failed to condemn African tyrants such as Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe or Omar Al-Bashir of Sudan. And aside from a few perfunctory criticisms, he has been noticeably quiet about the threats against Israel posed by Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Annan gave only a low-key response to Iran's state-sponsored Holocaust denial conference, which sparked international outrage this week. To his credit, incoming Secretary General Ban Ki Moon has already strongly denounced it.
As a result of this and more, the UN's standing as a moral authority on the world stage - not exactly stellar at the start of Annan's tenure - has plummeted during his 10-year reign. He was forced to disband the UN Commission on Human Rights after Western complaints over human-rights abusers (Cuba, Libya, et al.) running the show. Yet his "reform" solution, the much-vaunted Human Rights Council, is just as bad. It has been unwilling even to condemn the regime in Khartoum over the crisis in Darfur.
Even worse, amid a culture of weak and permissive leadership, UN peacekeepers entrusted with protecting some of the world's most vulnerable people have raped and abused hundreds of refugees in the Congo, Sierra Leone, Haiti and other war zones. Before he became secretary general, Annan was in charge of UN peacekeeping operations during the Rwanda slaughter and the mass killing at Srebrenica, in Bosnia. Suffice to say, in that capacity, he did not earn the top job. The free world should not shed a tear at Annan's departure. Rather, let New York bid good riddance to the most weak-kneed secretary general in the history of the United Nations, a shameless appeaser of despotism and tyranny. He may well be remembered as the Neville Chamberlain of our time. Gardiner is the director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation.

Originally published on December 17, 2006

Similar Threads

Adieu Jacques
by Curiosity | Mar 13th, 2007
Kofi Annan - Ugh!
by Maggiemygosh | Jul 20th, 2006
Kofi Annan Wins Hands Down
by Curiosity | Apr 22nd, 2006
Cash for Kofi
by Curiosity | Feb 19th, 2006
no new posts