Canadian dollar takes a hit as US looks to impose tariffs on softwood lumber

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Canadian dollar takes a hit as US looks to impose tariffs on softwood lumber



The Canadian dollar tumbled below the 71-cent mark today, continuing its downward trend and heading for what some analysts believe will be a bottom of about 70 cents (U.S.).

The currency has been hammered generally by the oil shock, poor prospects for domestic economic growth and the different paths being taken by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Canada.

The “price action is not surprising given the current volatility in the market, and growth currencies like the loonie could be at risk,” warned Bipan Rai, director of foreign exchange and macro strategy at CIBC World Markets.

The currency touched a low of 70.88 cents today, and ended the day at 71.02 cents

“With mounting tensions between Saudi Arabia and Iran, sellers are likely to conquer more land,” London Capital Group analyst Ipek Ozardeskaya said of the loonie and referring to the declining price of oil.

The loonie is at lows last reached in August, 2003, noted Bank of Nova Scotia, driven down by the oil slump and “the broader market tone of risk aversion.”

Analysts see the loonie eroding further still, though picking up later in the year.

“The Canadian dollar (CAD) is liable to weaken further in 2016, although a lot of bad news is already factored into the exchange rate,” Bank of Nova Scotia said in a new forecast late yesterday.

“The CAD dropped more than 16 per cent against the [U.S. dollar] in 2015 and has fallen more than 30 per cent over the past three years,” Scotiabank forecasters added.

“Low oil prices and sluggish domestic growth will count against the CAD in the coming year but we think longer-term investors may start to see the CAD as offering better value if spot reaches the 1.42/1.45 range in the next few months.”

By that, the forecasters mean a loonie worth between 69 cents and just shy of 70.5 cents.

source
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
oh well
if we had enough home grown industry to support ourselves it wouldn't matter
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,663
6,998
113
B.C.
Why ? It is not Canadians who will pay the tariffs . All this does is make Canadian lumber more expensive in America .
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Why ? It is not Canadians who will pay the tariffs . All this does is make Canadian lumber more expensive in America .

yes and then the american will have to decide if they want to pay for the expensive lumber here or the expensive lumber there.

those using lumber for anything will be the losers on both sides of the border.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
oh well
if we had enough home grown industry to support ourselves it wouldn't matter

we simply don't have the population for that..

Canadian pop. 36,626,083

US pop: 326,474,013

Trump is like an annoying splinter..

We'll adjust. He's only a mild bump of max 4yrs in the grand scheme of things.

That's assuming he doesn't open his mouth and tweet something worth impeaching him over...

or the russians don't provide him with an opportunity to pull a bill clinton.
 
Last edited:

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
It's a con game the US plays every now and then. The last time the Yanks pulled this scam they allowed raw timber into the US for US mills to process, but tried to restrict lumber milled in Canada. The main excuse for this seems to be that Canada has so many more trees than the US that Canada can produce lumber products more cheaply, therefore that is unfair to American lumber producers. That is the equivalent of Canada blaming the US for producing orange juice more cheaply than Canada. The Yanks have done this every time Canada produces a product more efficiently than the the US. The Yanks are great at talking free enterprise, but they rarely practice it.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
It's a con game the US plays every now and then. The last time the Yanks pulled this scam they allowed raw timber into the US for US mills to process, but tried to restrict lumber milled in Canada. The main excuse for this seems to be that Canada has so many more trees than the US that Canada can produce lumber products more cheaply, therefore that is unfair to American lumber producers. That is the equivalent of Canada blaming the US for producing orange juice more cheaply than Canada. The Yanks have done this every time Canada produces a product more efficiently than the the US. The Yanks are great at talking free enterprise, but they rarely practice it.

The American definition of "unfair" is anything that doesn't favour them.

Think of the United States as a twelve year old girl ...
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Guess what happens to Americans if there is a time when their demand exceeds the us ability to supply.
Who pays then?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
NEW ORLEANS – One little-known legacy of the now-expiring softwood lumber agreement: it spawned a massive, Canadian-funded humanitarian effort in the United States that people north of the border have never heard of.

Stories like Durosseau’s abound in disaster-affected areas of the U.S.: the New Orleans flood of 2005, the eastern seaboard after Hurricane Sandy in 2012, parts of Colorado flooded in 2013, a tornado-striken area of Missouri in 2011.

That’s because the 2006 Canada-U.S. agreement did more than bring a decade of peace to a perennially problematic trade file. One of its provisions was a guarantee that $500 million of the penalties previously levied on the Canadian lumber industry wouldn’t remain in the American treasury, or go to American businesses.

It went to American charities. One was Habitat for Humanity.
How a trade feud with Canada built hundreds of homes in places like New Orleans - National | Globalnews.ca