Mainstream media screams in pain as Trump becomes president

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
poor babies

At his first White House briefing, Trump press secretary Sean Spicer drew nervous tweets from the liberal media for calling on sources outside their comfort zone. He didn’t start with the usual alphabet: AP, ABC, CBS, NBC. He started with the New York Post, whose representative asked him when Trump would start building that wall he promised on the southern border.

New York Times reporter Michael Grynbaum tweeted within minutes: “Priorities, Day 1: Spicer calls on NY Post, CBN, Univision, Fox News. So far top newspapers & broadcast networks shut out.”

CNN media reporter Brian Stelter was wowed: “He's literally AND symbolically going over the heads of the reporters from the biggest newspapers and TV networks.”

Spicer eventually came around to the front row. But this was a really refreshing start to the Trump press policy.


more


Spicer, the new sheriff, shakes up the White House press room. How refreshing | Fox News
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Let us hope for a Donald Trump disaster - Scott Reid

If Trump’s success transfers from politics to governing, his dark and guttural ways will become entrenched
Let us pray that President Donald Trump fails. And that he fails spectacularly.
That may sound spiteful and ill-mannered: the final, grasping howl of the embittered and vanquished elite. Surely, common courtesy dictates that even Trump's critics should wish him well — if not for his benefit, then for the benefit of regular workaday Americans. Doesn't cheering his failure mean hoping for economic pain and international disorder? And if the U.S. stumbles, doesn't Canada slip also?
The answer to all of that is "yes." In typical times and under typical circumstances, we should cheer the incoming president, even if we oppose his or her policies. In 2001, for example, George W. Bush was greeted politely upon his swearing-in, despite lingering controversy over the election result.

Trump is a different beast altogether. Never before have we seen someone campaign like him, and we have no idea how he might govern. This is a man who stretches the truth or manufactures 96 per cent of what he says in public, spreading mistruths, exaggerations or outright lies. He can tolerate no criticism of any kind, adheres to no obvious standards of conduct and has outright rejected conventions of ethics and transparency. These are not modest failings. They are the cracking pistol warnings of a demagogue.
Responsibilities of office
Of course, we knew all this before. But what we've seen since Nov. 8 is even more alarming because it demonstrates that the new occupant of the White House is wholly unmoved by the responsibilities of office. In fact, he remains frequently hostile toward the anchoring institutions of American democracy.
When Trump attacks, in personal and visceral terms, the head of the CIA, he sends a signal to all in the new administration that he will accept no scrutiny of unapproved matters. When he threatens to blacklist media organizations deemed unsupportive, he tramples upon a vital instrument of public accountability. And when he waves off inquiry into his campaign's ties with Russia while signaling that he may soon drop sanctions, it provokes obvious questions of conflict. Questions that he clearly prefers remain unexplored.

.@CNN is in a total meltdown with their FAKE NEWS because their ratings are tanking since election and their credibility will soon be gone!
— @realDonaldTrump

Some held out hope that President Trump would set a different tone than candidate Trump in his inauguration address. That illusion was quickly shattered with an astonishing, jingoistic screed that characterized today's America as a place of "carnage."

As for his agenda, why would Canadians want it to succeed? Immediately upon taking office he issued an "or else" notice about renegotiating NAFTA. Softwood lumber is set to soon reignite into an uncompromising dispute. Until notified otherwise, the permanent threat of an import tax now hangs over our economy's head.

Then there's the uncertainty concerning Trump's approach as commander in chief. His dismissing view of NATO raises chilling questions about collective security, the integrity of post-war Europe and the global balance of military power. His persistent glibness about the use of nuclear weapons is the kind of thing that's best to just not think about.
Tactics will spread

Even in the context of all this, there is a more basic reason to desire Trump's failure: evolution. The laws of political natural selection dictate that a successful Trump presidency will necessarily breed a long line of descendants. His success will guarantee that vulgarity, divisiveness and ritual fabrication become commonplace. Those in his own party will rush to emulate and imitate him. Those opposed will feel competitively pressured to adopt the same tactics. And the spread will spill over borders. What we see first in U.S. politics is imported to Canada and other Western democracies.

■Trump vows to end 'American carnage'

Already, Trump's political victory has spawned Canadian mimics. Conservative leadership candidate Kellie Leitch borrows his nativism and catchphrases. Kevin O'Leary cribs his reality TV shtick. In America, voters will soon be subject to an endless flood of disciples in local, state and national races.
The harsh Darwinistic reality is this: if Trump's success transfers from politics to governing, his dark and guttural ways will become entrenched and ubiquitous. Because when standards fall, they rarely rise again – especially not when they are proven to work.
America – and Canada — will carry on just fine if Trump fails. We might not be able to say the same if he succeeds. So let's hope hard for Trump to be a disaster. Not out of pique. But out of pronounced self-interest and concern for the future.

Scott Reid is a principal at the communications consultancy Feschuk.Reid and served as Director of Communications to prime minister Paul Martin[/I]
 

Hoof Hearted

House Member
Jul 23, 2016
4,254
990
113
CNN used to be something. It became a tabloid news outlet after the O.J. trial...which also spawned the birth of reality TV shows.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Donald Trump has already been a disaster
for Hillary
:)

( hey HH, that one was a real greenie, lol)
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
10,616
5,259
113
Olympus Mons
CNN media reporter Brian Stelter was wowed: “He's literally AND symbolically going over the heads of the reporters from the biggest newspapers and TV networks.”
Wowed? My, don't we feel all self-entitled and self-important. CNN isn't worthy to cover dog shows.
His success will guarantee that vulgarity, divisiveness and ritual fabrication become commonplace.
Vulgarity. Yep he speaks from the hip, probably not his best asset but it resonates with people because he sounds like a real person, not some stuffed, pre-programmed shirt.
As for divisiveness, I have no idea where Scott Reid has been over the last 8 years but Obama has been playing identity politics. Genuine hatred between Americans is the highest it's ever been and it was climbing before Trump even threw has hat into the ring.
Then we have the complaint of ritual fabrication. Again, what rock does Scott Reid live under? Ritual fabrications are the name of the game in politics. Hey, did you know that political correctness is actually quite an old concept? The word politician is the genteel term for bullsh*t artist.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83