Royal Navy icebreaker smashes 80-year Antarctica record

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
A Royal Navy ship has ventured further south than any in 80 years, as sailors used a fisheries inspection mission to pay homage to Captain Scott and Sir Ernest Shackleton.

Ice Patrol Ship HMS Protector paid the first official visit to the East Antarctic and became the first Navy vessel to sail below 77 degrees latitude since before the Second World War.

Crew used a break in their Antarctica mission to trek across snow and ice to visit Capt Scott’s hut on Cape Evans, from which he launched his fatal attempt on the South Pole in 1911.

Royal Navy ice ship breaks 80-year Antarctica record


HMS Protector became the first Royal Navy vessel to the East Antarctic or sail below 77 degrees latitude since before the Second World War


HMS Protector during her ice-breaking transit through the Ross Sea Photo: PA


By Ben Farmer, Defence Correspondent
18 Jan 2016
The Telegraph

A Royal Navy ship has ventured further south than any in 80 years, as sailors used a fisheries inspection mission to pay homage to Captain Scott and Sir Ernest Shackleton.


Personnel from HMS Protector visiting Captain Robert Falcon Scott's hut, Cape Evans


Ice Patrol Ship HMS Protector paid the first official visit to the East Antarctic and became the first Navy vessel to sail below 77 degrees latitude since before the Second World War.


The kitchen inside Captain Robert Falcon Scott's hut, Cape Evans


Crew used a break in their Antarctica mission to trek across snow and ice to visit Capt Scott’s hut on Cape Evans, from which he launched his fatal attempt on the South Pole in 1911.


An inscription inside Captain Robert Falcon Scott's hut


The 5,000 tonne ice patrol vessel and her crew of 88 stopped off while policing fishing vessels in the Ross Sea region to protect the region’s delicate ecosystem.


L/Cpl Ben Roberts (front) and Marine Luke Bright trekking from HMS Protector


HMS Protector inspected fishing ships to ensure they kept to the area’s strict licensing regulations.

The ship also visited the Antarctic research station, Mario Zucchelli, on the shores of Terra Nova Bay.


Personnel from HMS Protector in Cape Evans Photo: EPA


WO Jimmy Stuart, Protector’s deputy marine engineering officer, said: “This was my first station visit and it was fascinating to see how the team supported themselves in such an inhospitable environment.

“It is one of our roles to visit stations in order to build up good relationships amongst the Antarctic Treaty nations.

“While it was a bright sunny day when we visited, we have become all too aware of how quickly the weather can turn nasty down here.”


HMS Protector operating off Cape Evans

Telegraph Tour

This trip of a lifetime, departing January 2017, takes you to one of Earth’s last great untouched wildernesses in the company of Monty Halls and the photographer Sue Flood, with a lecture from Sir Ranulph Fiennes in Argentina. See full details of our Telegraph Tour to Antarctica.



Royal Navy ice ship breaks 80 year Antarctica record - Telegraph
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
perhaps they will find the entrance to inner earth. ;)

They'd better not do it whilst Britain's in the EU, otherwise Britain would have to share all its fabulous resources with all the other 27 Member States.
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
British arctic and antarctic explorers had a bad habit of dying on expeditions, usually from inadequate planning and supply.. Franklin, Scott, Shakelton.. glad these guys made it home safely. Although it would be a stretch to classify this as the same edge of the envelope exploration.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Doesn't it bother you that the Royal Navy has a real icebreaker but the Royal Canadian Navy has none?

Does that make sense to any of you?
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
and our Navy would need one, because?

...because we have strategic, military interests in an Arctic of which we claim vast swaths, barely occupy and our claims overlap with those of a couple of powers who are less than genteel and may not respect the boundaries that we have declared.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
...because we have strategic, military interests in an Arctic of which we claim vast swaths, barely occupy and our claims overlap with those of a couple of powers who are less than genteel and may not respect the boundaries that we have declared.


What's wrong with the 19 ice breakers our Coast Guard has?
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
What's wrong with the 19 ice breakers our Coast Guard has?

They are unarmed and manned by unionized civil servants who couldn't defend their dinner plates. They don't know how to operate in fleets, how to hunt ballistic missile submarines under our coastal ice, how to coordinate with the navies of our very important allies.

They are really damn good at ice breaking, I'll grant you.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
They are unarmed and manned by unionized civil servants who couldn't defend their dinner plates. They don't know how to operate in fleets, how to hunt ballistic missile submarines under our coastal ice, how to coordinate with the navies of our very important allies.

They are really damn good at ice breaking, I'll grant you.



and the HMS Provider is all of the above?
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
and the HMS Provider is all of the above?

It is manned by Royal Navy personnel. They would be excercized in sailing with fleets of warships. I would have to look into the details on how she was built but you can bet your boots that the British left some provision for arming them (somewhat, anyway) because every axilliary needs to have that capability. They went to war in the Falklands, of all places and several civilian vessels were seconded and armed after a fashion.


Light arms ... More than a unionized civilian crew are going to carry.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Protector_(A173)

Are we serious about the shoreline that we claim?
 
Last edited:

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
It is manned by Royal Navy personnel. They would be excercized in sailing with fleets of warships. I would have to look into the details on how she was built but you can bet your boots that the British left some provision for arming them (somewhat, anyway) because every axilliary needs to have that capability. They went to war in the Falklands, of all places and several civilian vessels were seconded and armed after a fashion.


Light arms ... More than a unionized civilian crew are going to carry.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Protector_(A173)

Are we serious about the shoreline that we claim?


You do realize, that the Icebreakers that have been proposed since Mulroney have all been slated for the Canadian Coast Guard, right?
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
You do realize, that the Icebreakers that have been proposed since Mulroney have all been slated for the Canadian Coast Guard, right?

Yeah ..."Polar 8" became a couple of "Polar 4s", back then.

These aren't heavy ice breakers (like the old HMCS Labrador was)... more like slush breakers. They are SUPPOSED to be built but I'll bet that a cash-strapped Justin with old T-Jean Chretien whispering in his ear will cancel them, soon.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_DeWolf-class_offshore_patrol_vessel
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Yeah ..."Polar 8" became a couple of "Polar 4s", back then.

These aren't heavy ice breakers (like the old HMCS Labrador was)... more like slush breakers. They are SUPPOSED to be built but I'll bet that a cash-strapped Justin with old T-Jean Chretien whispering in his ear will cancel them, soon.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_DeWolf-class_offshore_patrol_vessel


In 2006 Prime Minister Stephen Harper had spoken about building three to four icebreakers capable of travelling through thick ice in the Arctic Ocean.[14][15][16]In 2007 it was announced that the Canadian Forces would purchase six to eight patrol ships having an ice class of Polar Class 5, meaning that they were capable of limited ice breaking,[17] based on the Svalbard class.[11] This announcement was met with some controversy, and the proposed ships have been called "slush-breakers", by Dr. Gary Stern, a scientist aboard CCGS Amundsen, and Jack Layton of the NDP.


In otherwords, a useless waste of money.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
In 2006 Prime Minister Stephen Harper had spoken about building three to four icebreakers capable of travelling through thick ice in the Arctic Ocean.[14][15][16]In 2007 it was announced that the Canadian Forces would purchase six to eight patrol ships having an ice class of Polar Class 5, meaning that they were capable of limited ice breaking,[17] based on the Svalbard class.[11] This announcement was met with some controversy, and the proposed ships have been called "slush-breakers", by Dr. Gary Stern, a scientist aboard CCGS Amundsen, and Jack Layton of the NDP.


In otherwords, a useless waste of money.

Maybe. The Arctic ice is thinning rapidly. They may be just the ticket. There is a weight trade off between carrying armaments and having heavy icebreaking capabilities. These vessels have modest armaments. The main weapon is the helicopter (and its a big one) that can carry all sorts of ordinance.