U.S. scientists successfully turn human cancer cells back to normal in process that c

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
AWESOME!!
___________________________
Cancer cells have been programmed back to normal by scientists in a breakthrough which could lead to new treatments and even reverse tumour growth.

For the first time, aggressive breast, lung and bladder cancer cells have been turned back into harmless benign cells by restoring the function which prevents them from multiplying excessively and forming dangerous growths.

Scientists at the Mayo Clinic in Florida in the U.S. said it was like applying the brakes to a speeding car.

So far it has only been tested on human cells in the lab, but the researchers are hopeful that the technique could one day be used to target tumours so that cancer could be “switched off” without the need for harsh chemotherapy or surgery.

“We should be able to re-establish the brakes and restore normal cell function,” said Prof Panos Anastasiadis, of the Department for Cancer Biology.

“Initial experiments in some aggressive types of cancer are indeed very promising. It represents an unexpected new biology that provides the code, the software for turning off cancer.”

Cells need to divide constantly to replace themselves. But in cancer the cells do not stop dividing, leading to huge cell reproduction and tumour growth.

The scientists discovered that the glue which holds cells together is regulated by biological microprocessors called microRNAs. When everything is working normally, the microRNAs instruct the cells to stop dividing when they have replicated sufficiently. They do this by triggering production of a protein called PLEKHA7 which breaks the cell bonds. But in cancer that process does not work.

Scientists discovered they could switch on cancer in cells by removing the microRNAs from cells and preventing them from producing the protein.

And, crucially, they found that they could reverse the process, switching the brakes back on and stopping cancer.

MicroRNAs are small molecules which can be delivered directly to cells or tumours so an injection to increase levels could switch off disease.

“We have now done this in very aggressive human cell lines from breast and bladder cancer,” added Prof Anastasiadis.

“These cells are already missing PLEKHA7. Restoring either PLEKHA7 levels, or the levels of miRNAs in these cells turns them back to a benign state. We are now working on better delivery options.”

Cancer experts in Britain said the research solved a riddle that biologists had puzzled over for decades, why cells did not naturally prevent the proliferation of cancer. “This is an unexpected finding,” said Dr Chris Bakal, a specialist in how cells change shape to become cancerous, at the Institute for Cancer Research in London.

The research was published in the journal Nature Cell Biology.

U.S. scientists successfully turn human cancer cells back to normal in process that could ‘switch off’ disease | National Post
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
The scientist or scientists that cure cancer will have the prestige and fame which will increase the salary they demand. They will be given grants for further research for companies looking to patent the cure.

There is big money to be made by those in the field. There is currently big money being made by snake oil sellers at this very moment to "cure" cancer.

There is relatively little money to be made from people dying.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
I agree with the fame, prestige, grants, etc for those who happen to cure cancer.

But there is plenty of money to be made off those who are dying. I've seen the bills.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
I agree with the fame, prestige, grants, etc for those who happen to cure cancer.

But there is plenty of money to be made off those who are dying. I've seen the bills.

Is it money spent on drugs, pallative care, etc though?
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
there are many serious deseases to find cures for, so once cancer has been beaten by scientists, they

can then spend more time on the others, I'm not a negative thinker, and the explanation in this article

looks genuine to me.

there has been many answers found for other ailments from the past, those deseases are not gone, or

controlled successfully, so hopefully this is the road to success for cancer.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Cool.

I agree with the fame, prestige, grants, etc for those who happen to cure cancer.

But there is plenty of money to be made off those who are dying. I've seen the bills.
Yeah, that has to make pharmaceutical companies a bit annoyed. Up goes the prices of other drugs I bet.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
All that and "additional tests".

When my friend was dying, we'd been told that he should get his affairs in order. However, they also performed a surgery to remove a tumour in his shoulder.

The surgery had me thinking that maybe there was still a chance. After all, why would they perform surgery if he was going to die in the next couple of months?

He died a month later. The loss and anger in me thinks it was fleecing. A make work project to incur charges.

The other side of me thinks they really had no idea how strong, how fast the cancer was spreading so they had hope they could manage it with radiation and remove what lumps they could. I'm still undecided which is the correct answer.



A cure would certainly go a long way to remove "additional tests" and non productive surgeries etc. It would stop the unscrupulous from using a persons fear of death to fleece them out of money.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
I've heard those stories and have experienced it myself.


When my cousin was terminal and in the hospital my uncle went batsh*t when he arrived to see that once again he'd been taking away for tests. He screamed like a madman to bring him back NOW... and they did.


Newfies aren't always that polite.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,610
2,359
113
Toronto, ON
When my friend was dying, we'd been told that he should get his affairs in order. However, they also performed a surgery to remove a tumour in his shoulder.

The surgery had me thinking that maybe there was still a chance. After all, why would they perform surgery if he was going to die in the next couple of months?

He died a month later. The loss and anger in me thinks it was fleecing. A make work project to incur charges.

The other side of me thinks they really had no idea how strong, how fast the cancer was spreading so they had hope they could manage it with radiation and remove what lumps they could. I'm still undecided which is the correct answer.



A cure would certainly go a long way to remove "additional tests" and non productive surgeries etc. It would stop the unscrupulous from using a persons fear of death to fleece them out of money.

I have to believe that at the medical/doctor level they are trying to do what they think is best for him. They probably factored pain of that particular tumor, quality of life, or had some hope for chemo or radiation. It may have been done out of arrogance (a doctor who thought he could beat the cancer) but I doubt it was done for profit.