Drama at the Toronto Star

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
Pulitzer-winning journalist Paul Watson quits Toronto Star over ‘refusal to publish’ story on Franklin expedition

Paul Watson, who won a Pulitzer prize in 1994, has quit the Toronto Star over that paper’s “refusal to publish a story of significant public interest” — an allegation the paper denies.

“Let me publicly deny this extremely odd idea,” Star publisher John Cruickshank wrote in a memo to staff on Wednesday of an alleged conspiracy to “constrain (Watson’s) reporting.”

“There is no truth whatever to the suggestion. Suppressing stories of significant public interest is something the Star has never done and will never do.”

Watson announced his resignation on his blog Tuesday.

Paul Watson's resignation post

July 7, 2015
At a meeting today in Vancouver, I submitted my resignation to the Toronto Star following the newspaper’s refusal to publish a story of significant public interest.
Resigning is the only way I can resume that reporting, complete the work and fulfill my responsibilities as a journalist.
My reporting is an attempt to give voice to federal civil servants and others involved in the grueling, High Arctic search for British Royal Navy explorer Sir John Franklin’s lost ships, HMS Erebus and HMS Terror. Several are experts in their fields.
For months, these individuals have been angry at what they consider distorted and inaccurate accounts of last fall’s historic discovery of Erebus in the frigid waters of eastern Queen Maud Gulf. They identify a peripheral member of the 2014 Victoria Strait Expedition, who has access to Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s office as well as editors at The Star, as the source of these accounts.
I intend to continue my efforts to bring this important story forward and will endeavor, as I have throughout my long career as a journalist, to ensure full, fair and accurate reporting of the facts.
Paul Watson

“Resigning is the only way I can resume that reporting, complete the work and fulfill my responsibilities as a journalist,” Watson wrote.
The article Watson says he couldn’t publish at the Star centres on the search for the lost ships of the 1845 Franklin expedition, an initiative led by Parks Canada that had significant input and personal investment by Prime Minister Stephen Harper. The discovery of one of the Franklin ships, the HMS Erebus, was announced by the prime minister in September of 2014.

Watson says experts and civil servants who worked on the 2014 Victoria Strait Expedition that found the wreck of the Erebus are outraged at what they see as “distorted and inaccurate accounts” of that discovery, which allegedly originated with a person close to the Prime Minister’s Office who also has influence within the Star.

Watson’s says his efforts to report on that person’s influence were stymied, and that editors put him under “a six-week reporting ban” he only broke free of upon his resignation.

“People are sick and tired of a government that is destroying our democracy by intimidating experts into silence so the politically connected and the powerful can fill that information vacuum,” Watson said in an interview posted on the Canadaland website on Wednesday.

“You might have thought this was a simple feel-good story, an effort to answer a mystery the world has been following for the last 170 years. But you’d be shocked at how much political sleaze that can generate,” Watson added.

Watson has promised more updates on his personal website and on his Facebook page. The Star’s website, which boasts of Watson as “Canada’s only Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist,” still lists him as staff as of Wednesday afternoon.

Toronto Star spokesperson Bob Hepburn said the company regretted Watson’s resignation but would not comment on personnel matters, including the alleged reporting ban. He also insisted the paper has never shied away from public interest stories, pointing to the paper’s stories on Rob Ford and Jian Ghomeshi as examples of the its commitment to hard-hitting journalism.

“We don’t suppress stories,” he said. “We haven’t done that in the past and we’re not doing that now.”

Watson won the 1994 Pulitzer Prize in breaking news photography for a grisly photo of a dead U.S. soldier being dragged through the streets of Mogadishu during the civil war in Somalia. He originally joined the Star in 1985 and covered foreign conflicts including in Somalia, Kosovo and Afghanistan. After leaving in 1998, he rejoined the Toronto daily from the Los Angeles Times in 2009 and has devoted most of his energies to reporting on Canada’s arctic.


Pulitzer-winning journalist Paul Watson quits Toronto Star over ‘refusal to publish’ story on Franklin expedition | National Post

like wow man.

more insight here:

Q&A with Paul Watson, Pulitzer Prize-Winning Journalist, on why he just Resigned from The Toronto Star | CANADALAND
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
There is much more to the story that is discussed in the Canadaland interview.




What makes it so significant are its implications, implications so severe that Watson resigned his position.


Who at the Star is afraid of how Harper may react if this story gets published?


Here are his own words to explain what is at stake:






The people who’ve been looking for these ships, they’re really hardworking federal civil servants, archeologists and others who know the truth of how those ships were found and had every right to tell that truth themselves. But because of the country we live in, and because of the government we live under, that message could only come from Prime Minister Stephen Harper himself.

There is an open fear in our federal civil service and I’m sure it applies to other capitals across the country as this phenomenon grows and our democracy weakens. There is a fear among these civil servants that if they stand up and tell the truth, that they will lose their jobs because the politically connected have more power than the truth.



So there was a [media] blackout [after the discovery] of roughly two days, could’ve been three. Remember, I was on the lead vessel in this successful search last September, the Coast Guard icebreaker. I was living with and working beside the experts who were searching for these ships. And because of that blackout, a person who’s the CEO of the Royal Canadian Geographical Society (RCGS) - a former Globe and Mail Editorial Board Chief - a journalist - was able to step into that power vacuum and answer journalists' questions in a way that I immediately saw people [involved with the effort] react to in a way that made them deeply angry because they believed that he was distorting facts, stating untruths and ruining the historical record that they were working so hard to create. And that was just a moment way back in September.


A variety of distortion and untruths emerged, so much so that Jim Basillie attempted to intervene, as reported in The Globe (link is external):


In late April, philanthropist Jim Balsillie, whose Arctic Research Foundation was instrumental in the search, sent a letter to Leona Aglukkaq, the Minister of the Environment, saying he was “troubled that Canadian history is not being presented accurately” in a documentary that aired on CBC’s The Nature of Things that month. He was upset that the program “creates new and exaggerated narratives for the exclusive benefit of the Royal Canadian Geographic Society.”


Mr. Balsillie said he was dispirited that the Prime Minister and public agencies seemed to take a back seat. “Government partners, in particular the Government of Nunavut, Canadian Hydrographic Service and the Canadian Coast Guard are shown as supporting players to RCGS and [the Russian vessel] Akademik Sergey Vavilov when the opposite is true.”Apparently, for reasons that are not yet clear, the Harper government ignored the letter and made no effort to correct the historical record.



There is an open fear in our federal civil service as this phenomenon grows and our democracy weakens. There is a fear among these civil servants that if they stand up and tell the truth, that they will lose their jobs because the politically connected have more power than the truth.

This is a symptom of a broader disease that is eating away at the core of our democracy. Experts on climate, on medicine, on things that are central to our society are being silenced by a government that does favours for the politically connected. And that is just very dangerous for our future. That, more than anything else, should make this a story worth following.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
A variety of distortion and untruths emerged, so much so that Jim Basillie attempted to intervene, as reported in The Globe (link is external):


In late April, philanthropist Jim Balsillie, whose Arctic Research Foundation was instrumental in the search, sent a letter to Leona Aglukkaq, the Minister of the Environment, saying he was “troubled that Canadian history is not being presented accurately” in a documentary that aired on CBC’s The Nature of Things that month. He was upset that the program “creates new and exaggerated narratives for the exclusive benefit of the Royal Canadian Geographic Society.”


Mr. Balsillie said he was dispirited that the Prime Minister and public agencies seemed to take a back seat. “Government partners, in particular the Government of Nunavut, Canadian Hydrographic Service and the Canadian Coast Guard are shown as supporting players to RCGS and [the Russian vessel] Akademik Sergey Vavilov when the opposite is true.”Apparently, for reasons that are not yet clear, the Harper government ignored the letter and made no effort to correct the historical record.



There is an open fear in our federal civil service as this phenomenon grows and our democracy weakens. There is a fear among these civil servants that if they stand up and tell the truth, that they will lose their jobs because the politically connected have more power than the truth.

This is a symptom of a broader disease that is eating away at the core of our democracy. Experts on climate, on medicine, on things that are central to our society are being silenced by a government that does favours for the politically connected. And that is just very dangerous for our future. That, more than anything else, should make this a story worth following.
How exactly does your quote from Balsillie mesh with your interpretation?

From here it looks like nonsense.