Texan on death row exonerated after nine years behind bars for crime he didn't commit

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Texan on death row exonerated after nine years behind bars for crime he didn't commit



After nine years of jail, most of which spent on death row, Manuel Velez has been released from a Texas state prison. Poor legal representation and prosecutor misconduct led a jury to find Velez guilty of killing his former girlfriend’s infant.

Velez had been on death row since 2008, when he was found guilty for the 2005 death of his then-girlfriend Acela Moreno’s 1-year-old son, Angel Moreno, who died of brain trauma.

Medical examiners who testified in Velez’s trial failed to point out information from their own report, that Angel’s injuries had occurred at a time that Velez was working a construction job far away, in Tennessee. Angel died, though, when Velez was at home in Brownsville, Texas.

Velez, who could not afford to hire adequate legal representation, was given court-appointed attorney who failed to notice these details in the medical report and others that could have exonerated Velez, according to Brian Stull of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Capital Punishment Project.

Stull said he was one of many attorneys who took up appeals in Velez’s case at the beckoning of “a Texas law professor” who “was concerned that Manuel could be intellectually disabled.”

The failure of Velez’s attorneys was verified by state courts during the appeals process, and he was ordered to receive a new trial.

Yet, it took significant efforts to supersede prosecutor misconduct and prove that Velez was innocent, Stull wrote.

Velez is “functionally illiterate in both Spanish and English,” and his interrogation was not recorded on video, though police did record statements made by his codefendant, Angel Moreno’s mother.

“Instead, they typed up two different statements in English and had Manuel sign them without being able to read them,” Stull wrote on Wednesday announcing Velez’s freedom.

“The statements were full of false claims, including that Manuel shook, bruised, and bit the baby – things that absolutely never happened. Because prosecutors liked one of the statements better – it had more of these false facts – they presented it to the jury as the only true statement, and claimed the less guilty one was a defense fabrication. But it was the prosecutors who were fabricating.”

The prosecutors also failed to correct Angel Moreno’s mother’s false claims about her plea agreement with the state, which erroneously downplayed her responsibility in her infant’s death. In addition, prosecutors relied on false testimony about prison conditions, which resulted in Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversing Velez’s death sentence in 2012.

Despite evidence of his innocence in the death, Velez eventually had to plead no contest to recklessly injuring the infant, given he did not report Angel’s abusive mother.

“We would have preferred to take Manuel's case to trial to prove his innocence and hear the words ‘not guilty,’ but we couldn't justify the risk of failure, or further injustice at the retrial,” Stull wrote. “We couldn't take that risk with a plea to time served on the table. So while he comes home free, he's still tainted by this broken system.”

Velez was released at around 12:30 p.m. ET on Wednesday, the ACLU reported. He is the 13th death row prisoner eventually exonerated in the state of Texas.

Texas has put to death over 500 inmates since 1982. More than 275 more inmate are awaiting capital punishment in the state.

source; Texan on death row exonerated after nine years behind bars for crime he didn't commit ? RT USA

........................................

1st day out, I suggest he buy a lotto ticket..
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
You know, I lived in Texas for 17 years and I have met several people born and raised in Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas that are illiterate ...

It still puzzles me how that can happen.

It is Texas.
Google death penalty verdicts by counties and states.
Real eye opener.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
He'll likely get a cash award for his time in prison and won't need to play the lotto. Shame that the prosecutor, cops, and judge won't be the ones to pay for it.

They should be though, eh? There should be some kind of repercussion for such a heinous miscarriage of justice. 9 yrs...He should be treated to a life paid for by those who made the error..
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Yeah, but 3 credible witnesses and DNA you get pushed to the front of the line..

Personally, I believe in the death penalty if the person is (1) caught on film murdering the victim, and or (2) serial murders that have DNA evidence connecting all victims, such as the killer in the Hannah Graham's Case.

What happens when the accused has a twin?
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
You're correct, but don't kid yourself that the criminal system is any more fair in places that don't have the death penalty, or don't use it much.

Oh I know that- The prosecutor lays a ton of charges and then may plea bargain.
A very high success rate as they only have to win one.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
What happens when the accused has a twin?

They probably have an alibi unless they are one of those sets of twins that do everything together. But I guess that could turn into "no it was that twin!" "No it was the other!"

Yeah, but 3 credible witnesses and DNA you get pushed to the front of the line..

Personally, I believe in the death penalty if the person is (1) caught on film murdering the victim, and or (2) serial murders that have DNA evidence connecting all victims, such as the killer in the Hannah Graham's Case.

That'd cut it down to maybe 1 a year.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
They probably have an alibi unless they are one of those sets of twins that do everything together. But I guess that could turn into "no it was that twin!" "No it was the other!"

Check DNA for twins. Very difficult if not impossible to separate one from the other. There is a legal case ongoing, cannot remember where with new tech being used for the DNA.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,639
7,099
113
Washington DC
Oh I know that- The prosecutor lays a ton of charges and then may plea bargain.
A very high success rate as they only have to win one.
If you want an infuriating and depressing run-down on how bad it's gotten, google Radley Balko and read his blog. He focusses on all the corruption, incompetence, and injustice in the "justice" system.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
If you want an infuriating and depressing run-down on how bad it's gotten, google Radley Balko and read his blog. He focusses on all the corruption, incompetence, and injustice in the "justice" system.

I will but later- going for supper and watching Person of Interest. I only watch a few shows, but this is one i enjoy.
I bookmarked it for later.
Thanks.