Inquest jury rules boy's starvation death a homicide

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
35,870
3,046
113
Inquest jury rules boy's starvation death a homicide
By Michele Mandel ,Toronto Sun
First posted: Friday, February 14, 2014 09:46 AM EST | Updated: Friday, February 14, 2014 05:35 PM EST
TORONTO - We will remember his name.
Jeffrey Baldwin is now seared into our conscience, the cherubic five-year-old who died emaciated and forgotten more than 11 years ago in the midst of our busy city, starved to death by his own grandparents while child welfare workers and even the adult relatives in his own home looked the other way.
Those grandparents have long been locked away in prison for second-degree murder and now the lengthy inquest into Jeffrey’s death has concluded with 103 recommendations designed to prevent a similar tragedy.
The first duty of any inquest jury is to reach a verdict on the death and in this case, their decision was an obvious one: Jeffrey died Nov. 30, 2002 as a result of a homicide, caused by “pneumonia and septic shock secondary to chronic starvation.”
The horrific details are well known: In the mid-1990s, Jeffrey and his three siblings were taken from their inept young parents by the Catholic Children’s Aid and placed in the eager care of master manipulator Elva Bottineau and hubby Norman Kidman. No one in the child welfare agency bothered to run even a cursory background check on the children’s grandparents; If they had, they would have discovered both were convicted child abusers.
The CCAS’s last contact with Jeffrey was in the summer of 2000 during a brief investigation into a tipster’s allegations of sex abuse. They concluded “he and his siblings appeared to be healthy and well.”
They were far from it.
After more than four years in his grandparents’ care, Jeffrey’s body was caked with bacteria a millimetre thick, fecal bacteria clogged his lungs, scabs covered his ***** and scrotum and he was too weak to battle the pneumonia that finally killed him. Jeffrey weighed just 21 pounds, still wasn’t toilet trained and was so tiny for his age that he was a head shorter than his brother who was two years younger.
He was, the coroner said at the time, “like a 90-year-old person in a five-year-old body.”
The boy’s eldest sister and youngest brother were the chosen ones — they enjoyed a warm bedroom and regular meals. Jeffrey and his younger sister were “the pigs” — kept captive in a fetid, locked and unheated room. With no access to the bathroom, their bare mattress was covered in urine and feces. In convicting the grandparents of Jeffrey’s murder in 2006, Justice David Watt described the children’s living conditions as so cruel that the Toronto Humane Society wouldn’t tolerate them for a household pet.
“Jeffrey’s death was preventable,” acknowledged CCAS director Mary McConville following the inquest recommendations Friday. “Finding this information in our records would have led to a different outcome. I am deeply sorry for the suffering and death of Jeffrey and for the harm caused to his siblings. I cannot change the past, but I have made every effort to change the future.”
Family members offering to care for children in need of protection are no longer a “blind spot” for child welfare agencies, she said. They are now subject to the same screening and criminal background checks as other foster parents.
The inquest called for better record keeping and information sharing across child protection agencies. “There was a call for a shared database after Jeffrey died and it’s more than a decade later,” complained Irwin Elman, provincial advocate for children and youth. “Just do it, for goodness sake.”
The jurors also recommended a mandatory investigative training and testing program for child welfare investigators that should include such basics as asking for identification.
But while the CCAS was often cast as the only demon in this horrible story, the jury’s wide-ranging recommendations suggest there were many other players who failed Jeffrey, including neighbours, school staff and members of his own family.
There were four other adults living in that east-end home — Jeffrey’s two aunts and their partners — who did nothing to save him as he was slowly starved to death. There was a teacher and an educational assistant who taught his six-year-old sister and though she reeked of urine, was ravenously hungry and frequently absent, they also failed to report what they saw. A neighbour noticed that Jeffrey had practically disappeared and when she finally saw him in public, he seemed really sick and unnaturally small.
She figured children’s aid was dealing with it, and reported nothing.
That blindness cannot continue. The jury has called on the Toronto District School Board to run annual mandatory training on the duty to report child abuse and neglect for all staff, including caretakers and lunchroom supervisors.
And one of their most interesting, and likely contentious, recommendations is that like doctors and teachers, members of the public should be subject to penalties if they fail to report their suspicions of abuse. It’s unconscionable that Jeffrey’s aunts and their partners will never be punished for watching him die before their very eyes.
More than a decade after he died, we remember Jeffrey Baldwin. That blond, angelic little boy wanted to fly; he wanted to be Superman. Let his name now soar — a reminder that no child should ever be so invisible again.
********
After 300 exhibits and more than three months of testimony, the four-member inquest jury delivered 103 non-binding recommendations to prevent further deaths like that of Jeffrey Baldwin.
Among them:

  • Within two years, implement the long-promised Child Protection Information Network, a database which would contain and share records across the province’s 46 children’s aid societies, and have it accessible to all child protection workers at all hours.
  • Consider amalgamating all Ontario children’s aid societies into one co-ordinated agency and in the meantime, have one 1-800 referral line.
  • Allow around the clock access for child protection workers to run criminal checks on potential caregivers through the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC),
  • Allow child protection workers to ask for “identification for reasonable inspection” from any adult living in a home with a child under CAS protection.
  • Annual home visits for any child under five placed with a relative, even after the case file is closed.
  • The province should develop a public awareness campaign about the duty to report concerns about child abuse or neglect.
  • Introduce penalties for members of the public who have “direct and substantive” knowledge of abuse or neglect but fail to report it.
  • All new child protection workers should have to go through an intensive training program, participate in field practice assignments and pass exams.
  • The Catholic Children’s Aid Society should develop a case study on the lessons learned from Jeffrey Baldwin to be included in future training.
  • Children’s Aid Societies should ensure that professionals who report abuse or neglect are notified that their report has been received so it doesn’t fall through the cracks.
  • The Toronto District School Board should have mandatory annual training for all staff on recognizing the signs of abuse and the duty to report.
  • Parents, especially minors, should be informed that they have a right to a lawyer when a child welfare agency is seeking to place their kids in care.
  • A press conference should be held in a year for agencies to report their progress in implementing the inquest recommendations.
Jeffrey Baldwin Nov. 30, 2002, weighing only 21 pounds. The five-year-old's grandparents Elva Bottineau and Norman Kidman were convicted of second-degree murder in 2006.

Inquest jury rules boy's starvation death a homicide | Toronto & GTA | News | Toronto Sun
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's repsonsibility


"There were many other opportunities, outside the child-welfare system, for Jeffrey to have been saved.
He wasn't enrolled in school and teachers thought something might be wrong when his sister was ravenous at snack time and smelled of urine, but they didn't report it, the inquest heard. Jeffrey wasn't seen by a doctor since he was 18 months old, the inquest heard.
Finally, not one of the six adults living in that home — Bottineau, Kidman, their two daughters and their partners — ever sought help for Jeffrey.
One daughter testified at the inquest that she "didn't pay that much attention" to Jeffrey's treatment and her partner told the inquest he noticed Jeffrey's slow decline and was "bugged" by it, but didn't want to "create friction" by reporting it.
The jury also recommended changes that could be made by several other provincial ministries, school boards, law enforcement agencies, the information and privacy commissioner of Ontario, doctors and fire chiefs.
"Child welfare doesn't just involve one child in child protection," said Freya Kristjanson, a lawyer who represented Jeffrey's siblings.
"Child welfare involves a whole community of protection. It involves schools, police and neighbours and professionals to report on abuse. It is changing the system and it is for all of us to think about child protection — helping the kids who live next door."
Professionals such as teachers, lawyers and doctors are legally obliged to report suspected child abuse, but there are no penalties for members of the public who fail to raise such concerns with the authorities. The jury wants to see that changed."

The jury wants to see that changed and I completely agree. When it's so clearly obvious that something is wrong, it is beyond the pale not to report it.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,396
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

When these kids get older they are the ones who end up with addictions, in gangs, prostitution, violent crime, drug dealing, theft, robbery, depression and high rates of suicide and overdose.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

When these kids get older they are the ones who end up with addictions, in gangs, prostitution, theft, robbery, depression and high rates of suicide and overdose.
you are EXACTLY right, but our society would rather build more jails later than help kids out of these situations....we can't afford to help kids....people don't get the connection
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

When these kids get older they are the ones who end up with addictions, in gangs, prostitution, theft, robbery, depression and high rates of suicide and overdose.

That's if they get older.

Jeffery didn't. And as far as I can determine those that absolutely turned a blind eye to what was happening to him are just as responsible for his death as those two monsters that had the gall to call themselves grandparents.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

No in every situation but I think frequently if kids are in an abusive situation the parents were abused...to then give the kids over to the grandparents without investigating is frightening to me because these are social workers who should have insight into the circle of abuse, and welfare etc...if they don't get it, how can society at large get it.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,396
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

That's if they get older.

Jeffery didn't. And as far as I can determine those that absolutely turned a blind eye to what was happening to him are just as responsible for his death as those two monsters that had the gall to call themselves grandparents.

Welcome to my neighbourhood. In one square mile there are 41 agencies dealing with Social issues. Some public funded some private and charity. It's pretty crazy at times but has come along way from what it was.

I've seen the changes in core urban but things are pretty slim in the rural and remote parts of my Province. It's a lot of ground to cover and not enough resources to do it.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

No in every situation but I think frequently if kids are in an abusive situation the parents were abused...to then give the kids over to the grandparents without investigating is frightening to me because these are social workers who should have insight into the circle of abuse, and welfare etc...if they don't get it, how can society at large get it.

Handing over custody of children without bothering to check the background of anyone is beyond grossly negligent. I get that services are strained, caseworkers are overloaded but that is completely unforgivable. The first people to fail this child were the parents. The second people to fail this child was the CAS.

Welcome to my neighbourhood. In one square mile there are 41 agencies dealing with Social issues. Some public funded some private and charity. It's pretty crazy at times but has come along way from what it was.

I've seen the changes in core urban but things are pretty slim in the rural and remote parts of my Province. It's a lot of ground to cover and not enough resources to do it.

It's an uphill battle, always will be. Sad, but true. And I know there are untold success stories out there, the odds are just for it. But it still strikes me that when we, collectively as a society, fail a child, the most vulnerable member of society, we seem to do so in a grotesquely spectacular fashion.

The penalty for an official to fail to report abuse is pitiful. Agents, like the one who placed this boy with that monster in the first place, are not held accountable in a sufficient manner. I don't mean to rag on all social services workers, I know many of them, they care and they do as a good a job as they possibly can. But we need to set the acceptability bar at a much higher level.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

Handing over custody of children without bothering to check the background of anyone is beyond grossly negligent. I get that services are strained, caseworkers are overloaded but that is completely unforgivable. The first people to fail this child were the parents. The second people to fail this child was the CAS.



It's an uphill battle, always will be. Sad, but true. And I know there are untold success stories out there, the odds are just for it. But it still strikes me that when we, collectively as a society, fail a child, the most vulnerable member of society, we seem to do so in a grotesquely spectacular fashion.

The penalty for an official to fail to report abuse is pitiful. Agents, like the one who placed this boy with that monster in the first place, are not held accountable in a sufficient manner. I don't mean to rag on all social services workers, I know many of them, they care and they do as a good a job as they possibly can. But we need to set the acceptability bar at a much higher level.
but how? if they have hundreds of kids on their case load how? What is their average day like? How much time is spent with the kids? They aren't even paid that well.
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

but how? if they have hundreds of kids on their case load how? What is their average day like? How much time is spent with the kids? They aren't even paid that well.

I meant to raise that bar for everyone, not just individual caseworkers. But in point of fact, if there was a strict requirement that a background check had to be attached to any placement order and that order had to be signed off on, this child would never have been placed with those people. Bottom line is, the caseworker that placed that child was negligent.

Also, there's this from the article:

"There was a call for a shared database, CPIN, after Jeffrey died and it's more than 10 years later...we hear that the ministry is perhaps six to seven years away from that," said Irwin Elman, the provincial advocate for children and youth.
Why is it taking 17 years to put this together when a shared resource database would highlight so many potential problems?

There are many, many ways in which "the system" can be improved. And that's before we even touch upon reviewing the requirements for those in the rest of society to report possible abuses.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

I meant to raise that bar for everyone, not just individual caseworkers. But in point of fact, if there was a strict requirement that a background check had to be attached to any placement order and that order had to be signed off on, this child would never have been placed with those people. Bottom line is, the caseworker that placed that child was negligent.
I don't think that caseworker was negligent according to how their system operated at the time. I see it more as a systemic issue which is now being forced into correction by a judge.

Also, there's this from the article:

Why is it taking 17 years to put this together when a shared resource database would highlight so many potential problems?
money, resources, no one to spear head it, it's "not my job"...no one was mandated to do so...once again a systemic issue because it is a system that is hard pressed for money...which and part of me knows it's an old song but I have to say it...that's why people like Duffy and Walin infuriate me... this kid is dead because we don't have the money, resources or will to help

There are many, many ways in which "the system" can be improved. And that's before we even touch upon reviewing the requirements for those in the rest of society to report possible abuses.
100% right....and we as a society have to have the will to do so... but ignorance and lack of concern impede it
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

I don't think that caseworker was negligent according to how their system operated at the time. I see it more as a systemic issue which is now being forced into correction by a judge.

No, it's not. It was a coroner's inquest, they have no mandate to enforce any kind of actual change. They can only make recommendations. Which is why it takes 17 years to get things done, if they actually ever do.

money, resources, no one to spear head it, it's "not my job"...no one was mandated to do so...once again a systemic issue because it is a system that is hard pressed for money...which and part of me knows it's an old song but I have to say it...that's why people like Duffy and Walin infuriate me... this kid is dead because we don't have the money, resources or will to help

100% right....and we as a society have to have the will to do so... but ignorance and lack of concern impede it
Kids don't vote. Bottom line, that's what we're talking about when it comes to effecting change.

So shame on us. Shame on all of us for not remembering these children and making those who make the rules make better ones for them.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

you are EXACTLY right, but our society would rather build more jails later than help kids out of these situations....we can't afford to help kids....people don't get the connection

I guess on the bright side there is more general awareness of the problem than when I was a kid. When I was in school there were several kids raised in drunken squalor and filth, but of course the drug problems then were much less.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

What a pile of crap. False tears and all. Mankind, let alone any existing society, doesn't give a rats a$$ about "children". From conception to "adulthood", if allowed to live, children are tolerated and nothing more.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

Perhaps if they put some laws on the books that protecte the 'community' when they 'solve the problem' would make for less abuses before the fact rather than let the Police and CS act after the abuse.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

Perhaps if they put some laws on the books that protecte the 'community' when they 'solve the problem' would make for less abuses before the fact rather than let the Police and CS act after the abuse.


Let me guess, your solution to "solve the problem" would be to kill the abuser, right?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

Actually it would be to get him to a Doctor to see if meds would help. The community is there to protect the children, that means keeing the two apart or do you think killing people is a good example to set for children?
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

Actually it would be to get him to a Doctor to see if meds would help. The community is there to protect the children, that means keeing the two apart or do you think killing people is a good example to set for children?


You already know my answer to that. Killing another human is never the answer for anything.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Re: Coroner's jury says child protection is entire community's responsibility

Yet you don't have any other option for my 'solution' even thought I am (most likely) a stronger supporter of God's book than you are.
BTW those words are how he talks to me, you should try it sometime.