Regina lawyer argues not enough aboriginal faces on SK jury rolls

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,395
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
If one has a right to be tried by a jury of peers - shouldn't there be more aboriginal faces on Saskatchewan's juries when the accused is of aboriginal ancestry?

Regina lawyer Bob Hrycan has launched a unique legal challenge which, if successful, could have farreaching implications for the jury system in this province.

Stony Lee Cyr is a 36-year-old aboriginal man who faces trial on one count of aggravated assault and two counts of assault with a weapon stemming from injuries suffered by a man, also aboriginal, in 2011 on the Pasqua First Nation.

Cyr wants to be tried by a jury.

But his lawyer is seeking to have the charges stayed before they even get to trial - arguing the Saskatchewan government has failed in its constitutional obligations when it comes to juries and aboriginal accused, like Cyr. Even if the trial proceeds, Hrycan says his client has a treaty right to at least a partially aboriginal jury.

"I can tell you from my own personal experience - an aboriginal person facing trial by 12 white jurors does not believe he's going to receive a fair trial," the veteran lawyer said in an interview after court.

"No applications like this have ever been made," he added.

Arguments on the issues are expected to be heard over the next couple days in Regina Court of Queen's Bench, when government lawyers will also respond to the application.

As part of his submissions, Hyrcan intends to reference a report, prepared by the Justice Ministry in 2004, which explored the issue of under-representation by aboriginal people on juries.

"Our position is the government chose not to act when they were aware of the problem. Now there's a constitutional dimension to the problem," said Hrycan, who contends there is "systemic underrepresentation" of aboriginal people throughout the jury selection process.

On Monday, Justice Lian Schwann began to hear evidence on the defence application when Hyrcan called Sheriff John Rhinelander to explain how residents are picked for jury service.

Rhinelander admitted that in his 30 years working with the sheriff 's office, he has seen only "a handful" of people from First Nation reserves serve on juries in the Regina judicial district. However, he noted that jurors aren't required to identify ancestry nor is it listed on the jury summons.

He told the court he has heard from some aboriginal people summonsed for jury service that they would not serve because "they don't trust the system" or didn't want to be in the position of judging someone. Others living on reserve have raised logistical problems of childcare and travel to come into Regina.

The application follows a report released earlier this year in Ontario. Authored by former Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci, he concluded aboriginal people in that province aren't sufficiently represented on juries - a problem he subsequently suggested likely exists throughout the country. Part of the Ontario problem is that potential jurors are chosen from municipal assessments lists. But because aboriginal people on reserves don't own land, they don't appear on those lists.

In Saskatchewan, prospective jurors are chosen at random using computerized lists of those with Saskatchewan health cards within a judicial district.

Earlier this year, an Ontario court ordered a new trial for a convicted killer after finding the province had violated his rights by failing to ensure aboriginal people were properly represented on jury rolls, despite knowing of the longstanding problem.

Hrycan said that decision reworked the legal landscape for constitutional obligations and juries. He said the ruling doesn't mean an accused has a right to have certain members of his own race on the jury, but rather to ensure members of his race have an equal opportunity to make it onto the list or roll of potential jurors.

The racial makeup of juries became a heated controversy in 2003 after an all-white jury acquitted two Caucasian men of sexually assaulting a 12-year-old aboriginal girl. At that time, the provincial government said it was embarking on a review of the jury selection process to explore ways of ensuring more racial balance.
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
The lawyer in this case is absolutely correct. But, I doubt if the Courts will allow this.

In most American situations like this, the person would be tried in a Tribal Court, and not by a court outside the reservation (Reserve in Canada). Of course, in the USA, Native peoples have far more rights than they do in Canada.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
I always thought jurors were picked or reject by defense anyway or is that an American thing?
Must be in Canada too.....The one and only time I was called, there was about 30 at the selection "meeting", I seem to recall that they called people in alphabetical order (I think) The crown attorney rejected one, they got their jury all picked before they got to me, so I collected my money for the bum trip (90 mile drive) and went home.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,395
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
Must be in Canada too.....The one and only time I was called, there was about 30 at the selection "meeting", I seem to recall that they called people in alphabetical order (I think) The crown attorney rejected one, they got their jury all picked before they got to me, so I collected my money for the bum trip (90 mile drive) and went home.
Mystery solved. thanks
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Define 'peers'.

There's a reason that juries aren't comprised exclusively of men when a man is the accused; or gang members that are jurors to try other gang members

Peers, to me, should mean a somewhat representative cross section of the community in which the person and victim (if there is one) lived.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
I always thought jurors were picked or reject by defense anyway or is that an American thing?

In California the County picks people randomly from the pool of registered voters and sends out a summons. Those without legitimate excuses are bound to appear. There is a process called voir dire in which counsel for both sides questions the prospective jurors. Each side gets to reject a specific number of prospective jurors using what is called a peremptory challenge for which no cause is necessary. There is also what is called challenge for cause in which the judge can dismiss overtly hostile, unbalanced, or other unusual types of people on motion of one side or the other. Those prospective jurors who pass muster are empanelled as jurors for a specific trial.

I don't like Govt. I'm not good in cooperating with Govt. I don't recognize any duty to Govt. When summoned for jury duty I undergo voir dire and make it readily apparent just how hostile I am. I'm always dismissed for cause. :)
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,395
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
Define 'peers'.

There's a reason that juries aren't comprised exclusively of men when a man is the accused; or gang members that are jurors to try other gang members
If disproportionate to the populous demographics in anyway would be slanted.

Peers, to me, should mean a somewhat representative cross section of the community in which the person and victim (if there is one) lived.
Pasqua FN is 50Km from Regina. His peers are transient to and from the city, there are more than enough Pasqua FN peers right here in the city.

He told the court he has heard from some aboriginal people summonsed for jury service that they would not serve because "they don't trust the system" or didn't want to be in the position of judging someone. Others living on reserve have raised logistical problems of childcare and travel to come into Regina.
Provincial Court is 8Km away in Ft. Qu'Appelle but this guy elected to go Queen's Bench which is in the city.

Another issue as noted above is his family name and not getting involved. The Cyr family is highly respected on Pasqua and there are some who would opt out because of that.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Peers, to me, should mean a somewhat representative cross section of the community in which the person and victim (if there is one) lived.

The term 'jury of one's peers' comes from old English Common Law. It literally refers to somebody's rank in the 'Peerage'. You could only be tried by a jury of those equal in rank (Baron-Baron, Earl-Earl, etc) or higher. The jury of 12 would investigate the allegation and come up with a finding on their own. No slimy lawyers, no loopholes, just 12 of your peers looking for the truth.