US food corporations fueling obesity epidemic with addictive ingredients

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Battle of the bulge: US food corporations fueling obesity epidemic with addictive ingredients



By 2030, more than half of Americans could be obese, taxing the nation’s health while costing the country $500 billion in lost economic productivity. The food industry, however, is doing its best to keep the public hooked – no matter what the price.

With one out of three adults clinically obese and 40 percent of children officially overweight, the US is the fattest country in the developed world. The burgeoning public health crisis will see instances of diabetes, heart disease, stroke and cancer skyrocket over the next two decades, taking an already strained healthcare system to breaking point.

But with food manufacturers keen on keeping customers loyal while maximizing their profits, public health concerns are likely to be dwarfed by the bottom line.

“What these food scientists have done is that they’ve gone to a lab and they’ve created these chemical concoctions that are very sweet, very fatty and very salty. And they call that the bliss point. Meaning they’ve created addictive foods that are going to get consumers hooked and they’re going to keep wanting to come back for more and more foods,”
Elizabeth Kucinich, of Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine, told RT.

And while critics might also point toward issues of self-control, the foods which are least healthy are also the cheapest, although this reality is more a failure of government policy than an inevitable reality.

In 1980, no one had even heard of high-fructose corn syrup. But agricultural subsidies highly distorted market prices, bringing about the rise of cheap corn, which is a staple of highly processed foods like soft drinks and much of what you find on the supermarket shelves.

Between 1985 and 2010, the price of beverages sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup fell 24 percent in real terms, with American children consuming on average an extra 130 calories daily from soft drinks.

If that wasn’t bad enough, a 2010 Princeton University study found that rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup gained substantially more weight than those with access to table sugar, even if their overall caloric intake was equal.

However, a plan by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to limit soda drinking cups to 16 ounces, for example, was met with derision, even when the public health benefits of such a ban were obvious.

And it’s not just corn. Casein, a milk protein commonly used in processed foods, also has addictive qualities that lead to overeating.

“Milk protein… casein, when it breaks down in our digestive system, turns into casomorphin, [which] is relative to morphine – the drug,” Kenneth Kendrick, a whistleblower and food safety advocate, told RT. “It gives us a little stimulation in our brain and gives us a little bit of pleasure.”

Kendrik said the reason why food in the US is both addictive and laden with fat, sugar and salt is simple.

“In one word, I would say: greed. We obviously are putting money above public health,” he said. “Just like with cigarettes, we want to keep people addicted. I equate it to what the cigarette industry did. They deliberately wanted to put things in that were addictive because that drives sales and will continue to drive generations of sales.”

But as savvy and unrestrained marketing campaigns allow corporations full rein to market their products to the US public, the defeat of California’s Proposition 37, which would have required the labeling of all food products containing genetically modified organisms, proves that they want full control over the narrative about what US consumers are putting into their bodies.

While European countries require genetically modified foods to be labelled, in the US the biotech industry and corporations like Pepsi Co. and Coca Cola spent millions last year to defeat the California ballot initiative for GMO genetically modified organism labeling,” Kucinich said.

It is this perfect storm of labeling control, addictive food additives and shockingly effective marketing that has America on course for an epidemic of monumental proportions.

source: Battle of the bulge: US food corporations fueling obesity epidemic with addictive ingredients ? RT USA
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I'm wondering why they threw in GMO's? The article is complaining about high fructose corn syrup, which is listed on labels as well as milk proteins(products). It's very easy for one to READ the label and make a choice. Of course, GMO, is the big boogey man these days so throwing that in also helps to create the fear they are looking for.
 

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
I'm wondering why they threw in GMO's? The article is complaining about high fructose corn syrup, which is listed on labels as well as milk proteins(products). It's very easy for one to READ the label and make a choice. Of course, GMO, is the big boogey man these days so throwing that in also helps to create the fear they are looking for.

GMO is like the Oil Sands to the Green Movement... taboo

I don't think GMO's will make you fat, but you might grow two heads..

 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
I'm wondering why they threw in GMO's? The article is complaining about high fructose corn syrup, which is listed on labels as well as milk proteins(products). It's very easy for one to READ the label and make a choice. Of course, GMO, is the big boogey man these days so throwing that in also helps to create the fear they are looking for.

Labels can be confusing at times.
A person should not have to be a half assed chemist to ID the ingredients.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Labels can be confusing at times.
A person should not have to be a half assed chemist to ID the ingredients.


You do realize that it is possible to eat without buying packaged foods, right?
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Packaged is open for definition.
Difference between prepackaged and so called fresh.


I can buy all my meat, vegetables, fruit, un-packaged. You can by flour, spices, etc without any additives. You don not have to buy packaged/canned anything to feed yourself.

If one does not understand what is written on the can, don't buy it. If you don't like the preservatives and additives, don't buy it. If people didn't buy it, it would stop being made pretty damn quick. If people only bought that which did not contain preservatives or additives, then that's what the food makers would all start making. Be prepared though, shelf life will be severely shortened and prices will climb through the roof because of that.

So, basically, blame the consumer, they are the ones that set the trends and buy the product.