Sea life relocating fast in response to climate change

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
Sea life relocating fast in response to climate change

Extinctions possible as predators move into new areas





Many fish and plankton are relocating towards the North and South poles at an astonishing rate of hundreds of kilometres per decade in response to climate change, a new study has found. That is shaking up ecosystems and forcing the fishing industry to adjust.

The changes are far more dramatic than those seen on land, where species have been creeping nearer the poles at just six kilometres per decade, reported an international team of scientists led by University of Queensland biologist Elvira Poloczanska in Nature Climate Change this week.

"I think we were surprised at how much faster things were moving," said Mary O'Connor, a University of British Columbia researcher who co-authored the study.

Fish are moving an average of 277 kilometres per decade, zooplankton at 142 kilometres per decade and phytoplankton at a whopping 470 kilometres per decade.

In some cases, the movements are bringing together species that have never had contact before.

For example, Antarctic waters were traditionally free of predators with jaws capable of crushing their prey.

"Now that it's warming, those predators including sharks and big crabs are expanding into Antarctica, and they're eating things that evolved without crushing predators," O'Connor said. "It's probably going to lead to extinctions of prey."

Goodbye salmon, hello tuna?

In other cases, changes require some adaptation by humans.

For example, climate change is bringing warmer-water species such as tuna within reach of the Canadian border, while having a negative impact on B.C. populations of Pacific salmon.

"There are certainly trade-offs," O'Connor said. "We might like to have some tuna every now and then, but we certainly will miss our salmon."

The study also found that warmer spring temperatures are prompting some species to breed earlier and earlier each year — about 11 days earlier per decade in the case of fish and zooplankton. Meanwhile, phytoplankton, which are a major food source for baby fish and zooplankton, are influenced more by the amount of sunlight and less by the temperature. They have started blooming just six days earlier per decade, leading to a worrying mismatch between the hatching of zooplankton and baby fish and the availability of their food.

O'Connor said that problem has already been documented, and has affected ocean productivity in some places such as northern Europe.

It has been known for about 15 years that the ranges of plants and animals on land have been changing in response to climate change, but no comparable study had been done for marine life.

Change not random

In order to conduct their study, Poloczanska and her team analyzed 208 studies of 857 species that had been monitored for 19 to 343 years. They looked at the changes in range over time, and determined whether the changes were random or consistent with climate change. In 80 per cent of the cases, the movements were consistent with climate change.

"In general, the ranges are getting a little bit bigger, and they're doing so by expanding towards the pole where it's cooler," O'Connor said. "And they're retreating from the areas that are too hot…. It's quite unlikely that it's just random change."

O'Connor said one thing she noticed while taking part in the study was that there was very little data from Canada compared to other places, where governments have been keeping tabs on oceans in order to manage land use, development, resource extraction, and marine resources such as fisheries.

She thinks Canada needs to do a better job in order to manage its oceans at a time when things appear to be changing quickly.

"We're seeing signals of climate change in the ocean," she said. "And it should influence how we interact with the ocean."

source: Sea life relocating fast in response to climate change - British Columbia - CBC News
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
But of course this has nothing whatsoever to do with human activity. Nothing to see here, folks. Continue raping and pillaging the planet. Must make money for the Conservative and Republican rich.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Typical CBC drivel.

Yeah. More "climate change" claptrap.

And this is why folks like you should be paid no attention...it wouldn't make any difference how the climate is changing for the species' response to temperature, yet here is documented evidence of the impacts and you two can't even accept that.

Ocean life is in the majority cold-blooded, therefore metabolism is regulated in large part by the temperature of the water. The life that can regulate body temperature themselves will still have to migrate anyways to keep up with prey items. This is simple physiology and ecology, and temperature fluxs poleward are well established phenomenon, and you can't even accept it. You think it's easily dismissed because it's CBC, or you have some bent politically. That's rubbish. Walt, it's called ad hominem when you dismiss something because of the source, which you never mind pointing out to others when it refers to Fox News for example.

And some people wonder why the label deniers gets used...
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,639
7,099
113
Washington DC
And this is why folks like you should be paid no attention...it wouldn't make any difference how the climate is changing for the species' response to temperature, yet here is documented evidence of the impacts and you two can't even accept that.

Ocean life is in the majority cold-blooded, therefore metabolism is regulated in large part by the temperature of the water. The life that can regulate body temperature themselves will still have to migrate anyways to keep up with prey items. This is simple physiology and ecology, and temperature fluxs poleward are well established phenomenon, and you can't even accept it. You think it's easily dismissed because it's CBC, or you have some bent politically. That's rubbish. Walt, it's called ad hominem when you dismiss something because of the source, which you never mind pointing out to others when it refers to Fox News for example.

And some people wonder why the label deniers gets used...
Oh, nonsense! All you greenie-weenies scream "climate change!" whenever anything happens. You fools would blame climate change for UFO sightings.

Clearly this is a simple case of social mobility among sealife. As some species improve their positions through hard work and thrift, they can afford better neighbourhoods.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
And this is why folks like you should be paid no attention...it wouldn't make any difference how the climate is changing for the species' response to temperature, yet here is documented evidence of the impacts and you two can't even accept that.

Ocean life is in the majority cold-blooded, therefore metabolism is regulated in large part by the temperature of the water. The life that can regulate body temperature themselves will still have to migrate anyways to keep up with prey items. This is simple physiology and ecology, and temperature fluxs poleward are well established phenomenon, and you can't even accept it. You think it's easily dismissed because it's CBC, or you have some bent politically. That's rubbish. Walt, it's called ad hominem when you dismiss something because of the source, which you never mind pointing out to others when it refers to Fox News for example.

And some people wonder why the label deniers gets used...

So, I'm curious how a tax will 'fix' this problem and return the seas/oceans back to where they were 10, 20 or 50 years ago.

The claptrap that is the reference point in this debate relates to the non-solutions that are perpetually forwarded in addition to the multiple scandals that plague the environaut lobbies that are feverishly trying to find a way to tax the problem.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
So, I'm curious how a tax will 'fix' this problem and return the seas/oceans back to where they were 10, 20 or 50 years ago.

That is a far better discussion to have than whether or not scientifically observed phenomenon are actually happening.

Personally, I don't think it would in the time frames you've mentioned. That doesn't mean we should do nothing and simply ignore something because it was reported by CBC though.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
That is a far better discussion to have than whether or not scientifically observed phenomenon are actually happening.

The problem is that a cause and effect relationship is being assumed and action demanded on that assumption.

Personally, I don't think it would in the time frames you've mentioned. That doesn't mean we should do nothing and simply ignore something because it was reported by CBC though.


I agree, but what to do?

Fact is; if the eco-lobby demands that this is an AGW-related issue, the solution lies in population controls... As that discussion is not PC, the easiest solution is a tax.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Fact is; if the eco-lobby demands that this is an AGW-related issue, the solution lies in population controls

That isn't a fact. That's very much an arguable point. You're employed in finance aren't you? Do you ever personally execute risk assessments? That's a good exercise to start with...
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
140
63
Backwater, Ontario.
And this is why folks like you should be paid no attention...it wouldn't make any difference how the climate is changing for the species' response to temperature, yet here is documented evidence of the impacts and you two can't even accept that.

Ocean life is in the majority cold-blooded, therefore metabolism is regulated in large part by the temperature of the water. The life that can regulate body temperature themselves will still have to migrate anyways to keep up with prey items. This is simple physiology and ecology, and temperature fluxs poleward are well established phenomenon, and you can't even accept it. You think it's easily dismissed because it's CBC, or you have some bent politically. That's rubbish. Walt, it's called ad hominem when you dismiss something because of the source, which you never mind pointing out to others when it refers to Fox News for example.

And some people wonder why the label deniers gets used...


They listen to Lowell Green.............
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek
"She thinks Canada needs to do a better job in order to manage its oceans at a time when things appear to be changing quickly."

How the heck do you 'manage' an ocean?
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,639
7,099
113
Washington DC
"She thinks Canada needs to do a better job in order to manage its oceans at a time when things appear to be changing quickly."

How the heck do you 'manage' an ocean?

Well, first you need an airtight representation agreement.

I can draw one up for you at very reasonable rates.