Duffy is past expiry date- Harper should cut him loose.

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Mike Duffy must be cut loose | Full Comment | National Post

Point- For those in need of money - Just ask the PM's Chief of Staff for a gift.

For a moment there, it looked like Mike Duffy might have escaped any lasting damage over his improper Senate expenses. But then CTV News, his former professional home, came along and put another torpedo into his side. Contrary to the Senator’s claims that he had shown honest leadership when he repaid what he’d wrongly taken, it’s now been revealed that Sen. Duffy had plenty of help paying us all back. And from the very top of the federal government, no less.

Sen. Duffy, who was an Ottawa journalist with CTV for decades, has lived in that city for many years. When Prime Minister Stephen Harper appointed him to the Senate, to represent P.E.I., in 2008, Sen. Duffy declared a cottage on Prince Edward Island to be his primary residence. He then claimed the $22,000 annual expense for senators whose primary residences are more than 100 kilometres from the capital. The expense is offered to cover what is an oddity of the senate — you’re required by law to live in one place while working in another, perhaps thousands of miles away.

But claiming expenses didn’t make much sense in Sen. Duffy’s particular case: He already had a home in Ottawa. He’d lived there for years. And his cottage — sorry, “primary residence” — is mortgage-free, requiring only upkeep and property taxes. Surely Senators are paid well enough to pay for their own cottage’s hydro bill?

Charging the taxpayers $22,000 a year to pay for the house he already lives in wasn’t a justifiable expense related to his performing his government duties. It gave every appearance of Sen. Duffy gouging the taxpayers for $22,000 a year he wasn’t entitled to and didn’t need to do his job.

Stephen Harper’s chief of staff wrote personal cheque to cover Mike Duffy’s senate expenses: report | Canadian Politics | Canada | News | National Post

“Mr. Duffy agreed to repay the expenses because it was the right thing to do. However, Mr. Duffy was unable to make a timely repayment,” Harper’s spokesman Andrew MacDougall told the CBC.

“Mr. Wright therefore wrote a cheque from his personal account for the full amount owing so that Mr. Duffy could repay the outstanding amount.”

The CTV story says Wright and Duffy made a deal that involved the senator paying back the money he owed in exchange for some financial assistance and “a promise from the government to go easy on him.”

A government source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, said Wright and Duffy are friends and that Wright offered the money as a gift rather than a loan.
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
"Mr. Duffy was unable to make a timely repayment." Easy, miss a couple of meals and sell your pants to a tent company.
 

Trex

Electoral Member
Apr 4, 2007
917
31
28
Hither and yon
Another selfish porker trampling over the wee piglets to root deep into the trough.

In all honesty they come in all political sizes and colors.
The taxpayer pays for them all.

Harper should take the high road and punt this one right out of the party just like Brazeau.

The other parties can do as they see fit.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I think some prison time is in order. If Harper were smart he would have done just that now of course his office is implicated, rules have been broken. That fraudulent islander should go down ninty thousand would get most of the rest of us three to five I think.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
You can kick who ever you want out of the party or the House of Commons
Not so when it comes to the Senate only age and some obscure misconduct
could lead to that action. Remember Harper appointed this weasel in the first
place so he has no one to blame but himself. Duffy has always been a pudgy
little whatever in my view.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Where is Five Paradox when he's needed. He seems to know a lot about these Parlimentry things.

Here are some answers to questions you may have- In the article.

The only right thing left for Mike Duffy to do now is resign | Full Comment | National Post

It would be questionable, at best, for anyone to make such a large payment to a senator, whose responsibilities, let us remember, include voting on government bills. But of all the people who might legitimately make such a payment, the prime minister’s chief of staff would seem the last; if, likewise, the prime minister’s chief of staff were looking for someone on whom to shower his benevolence, he could surely have found someone other than a sitting legislator. To have done so, what is more, even as an outside audit of Duffy’s expenses was underway, is simply beyond belief.

All sorts of questions arise. Was it, first of all, a gift or a loan? If it were a loan, Wright would be obliged to record it as an asset in filings with the ethics commissioner. We are assured by anonymous sources that there was no expectation of repayment, i.e., that it was a personal gift. But if so, Duffy would arguably be prohibited from accepting it under the Senate Conflict of Interest code. (“Neither a Senator, nor a family member, shall accept … any gift or other benefit, except compensation authorized by law, that could reasonably be considered to relate to the Senator’s position.”) Either way, there appears to have been no disclosure of the arrangement — if the prime minister’s spokesman is to be believed, not even to the prime minister.

Indeed, when Duffy announced, back in February, that he would repay the money, he gave no hint that, in fact, it was the prime minister’s chief of staff who would be paying, though the two had arranged it just days before. Nor, one assumes, would we have ever learned of this clandestine agreement, had it not leaked out. Which raises another question: why are we finding this out now? Who leaked it, and why? Does it have anything to do with last week’s report of a possible RCMP investigation into the expenses of Duffy and two other senators?

What undertakings, if any, did Duffy make in return for the money? The auditors’ report notes that Duffy refused all further cooperation with them once the repayment was made. CTV quotes him as saying, in a leaked email: “I stayed silent on the orders of the PMO.” What did he mean? What promises, if any, did Wright make to secure his help in making an embarrassing story go away? Again, CTV quotes sources suggesting the government promised “to go easy on him.” What on earth does that mean?

Whether it was within the rules or not, what we do know of this “gift” is that it relieves Duffy of having to pay any penalty for his actions. The senator has never acknowledged wrongdoing in this affair, neither in claiming expenses on his Ottawa residence as if it were a second home (he says the rules defining a senator’s primary residence were unclear) nor in claiming per diem expenses for Senate business while on holiday in Florida (he says a staffer mistakenly filed the claim). No one who is not actually in the pay of the government finds his explanations credible.
 

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
9
Aether Island
Dear Goober,
How can Harper cut Duffy loose when the gift of $90 000 came from Harper's chief of staff?
As always,
Spade
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Dear Goober,
How can Harper cut Duffy loose when the gift of $90 000 came from Harper's chief of staff?
As always,
Spade

Duffy could resign for health reasons. Both will be investigated by the Ethics Commissioner as this deal stinks to high Heaven.
 

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
9
Aether Island
Dear Goober,
The "government" is quoted as saying "they" would "go easy on him." A gift of $90k? Does it get any easier than that?
Jeepers, where's the outrage from our conservative cousins?
Once again,
Spade
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Dear Goober,
The "government" is quoted as saying "they" would "go easy on him." A gift of $90k? Does it get any easier than that?
Jeepers, where's the outrage from our conservative cousins?
Once again,
Spade

They have made it known on CC since this began earlier in the year.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Dear Goober,
"They" made the $90k gift known on CC earlier this year?
Cheers,
Spade
PS
Who is "they"?

When it began it was regarding housing allowance- Those that are Cons on this site went for Duffy's jugular- That is what I was referring to.

So does this mean that Duffy was repaid for allowances he returned to the Senate by the Chief of Staff. Man this stinks.

Mike Duffy cheque: Stephen Harper stands by chief of staff Wright | Canadian Politics | Canada | News | National Post
Wright dipped into his personal funds to help Duffy repay the cash the senator had claimed against his home in an Ottawa suburb because, Harper’s office said Wednesday, “Duffy was unable to make a timely repayment.” Wright wrote the personal cheque, Harper’s office said, so Duffy could repay the approximately $90,000 in living expenses he had claimed over more than three years in the Senate.

A senior official told Postmedia News on Thursday that Wright gave the personal cheque to Duffy’s lawyer to be held in trust.

However, Duffy also took out a loan from Royal Bank to cover the cost of repaying his Senate expenses, according to a Senate source with knowledge of the financial arrangement. In a report Wednesday, CTV said Duffy told the broadcaster that he dealt with the bank alone and Wright was not involved in that transaction.

Duffy has not returned a request for comment.

The transaction between Duffy and Wright — which government officials on Wednesday said Harper didn’t know about until Tuesday night — is being reviewed by the federal ethics watchdog. The Senate ethics officer has declined to comment.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
75
Eagle Creek
Duffy's a bloated blot on the Senate, that he is still breathing is a small miracle. He's also stupid or he wouldn't have tried to scam funds. I am not totally surprised though, there are probably many instances of MPs over the years scamming the public purse - just waiting for some enterprising young reporter to uncover them. That said, I really can't see what the furor is all about. He borrowed money from a friend. That friend is a Conservative. I doubt Duff has many Liberal friends and none that would lend him money. The sticky part comes with who the friend is and what he does. But again, so he's the PM's assistant? And if it comes to it, why couldn't the PM have lent him the money from his personal account.

What matters is that the money gets put back in the public coffers.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Duffy's a bloated blot on the Senate, that he is still breathing is a small miracle. He's also stupid or he wouldn't have tried to scam funds. I am not totally surprised though, there are probably many instances of MPs over the years scamming the public purse - just waiting for some enterprising young reporter to uncover them. That said, I really can't see what the furor is all about. He borrowed money from a friend. That friend is a Conservative. I doubt Duff has many Liberal friends and none that would lend him money. The sticky part comes with who the friend is and what he does. But again, so he's the PM's assistant? And if it comes to it, why couldn't the PM have lent him the money from his personal account.

What matters is that the money gets put back in the public coffers.
It comes down to the appearance of buying a favor.
So Duffy borrowed from the bank to repay his claim to the Senate- then the Chief of Staff writes a checque for 90 K to Duffy- So did Duffy repay it? Was he reimbursed by the Chief of Staff for the 90 k to make the problem go away.
It appears that Duffy may have claimed expenses when he was campaigning for the Cons. That is not Senate business. If he did that then the claim(s) could be classed as fraudulent.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2013/05/16/pol-duffy-senate-expenses.html

Senator Mike Duffy is listed as being on Senate business during the last federal election on two days when documents show he was campaigning for the Conservatives in the Greater Toronto Area.

The Deloitte audit that reviewed the living and travel expense claims for Duffy and Senators Mac Harb and Patrick Brazeau shows that Duffy was neither in Ottawa nor Prince Edward Island, but in an "other location" on Senate business on April 27 and 28, 2011.

The prime minister's office said Thursday the Conservative Party is reviewing Duffy's expense claims from the 2011 campaign.

He remains a Conservative senator, but he is under increasing internal party pressure to leave caucus.

Senate rules allow for the work of senators to continue during elections. It is not known what Senate business Duffy was conducting on April 28.

Duffy did not co-operate with the Deloitte auditors. The report says it is not clear from his travel claims where he was on the days he claimed per diem amounts.

But an invoice written by Duffy is titled, "Mike Duffy campaigning in the GTA, April 27 & 28, 2011." It indicates he flew out of Ottawa on April 27, spent the night in a hotel in Toronto on April 28, and flew back to Ottawa on April 29.

The invoice is included in Elections Canada campaign expense records for Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver's campaign. Oliver was elected in the Toronto riding of Eglinton-Lawrence.

An email from a political operations officer for the Conservative Party of Canada, Felix Wong, to Oliver's campaign manager, John Penner, is also in the expense file. It says the total cost for Duffy's trip to Toronto was $1,355.56 and "that amount will be divided between the eight ridings that he visited, so each riding will be responsible for $169.45."
 
Last edited:

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
Harper is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't Remember he appointed some people
to do his bidding in the upper chamber. You know the one that is supposed to protect us from
over zealous government and be a sober second thought. Instead both the Liberals and the
Conservatives over time have turned it into a partisan club, whoever is in power stacks the room.
Now of course the place is full of people who are there for themselves because they are a special
interest of the government of the day.
If Harper keeps him around they are going to be under fires for keeping him. The other misfits are
going to come under the gun right after Duffy exits. And there will be more as both sides have
misbehaving members but right now its Tory transgressions we are concerned with.
This is an exclusive club Tories and Liberal New Democrats are there yet and need not apply for
membership.
I think be best sober second thought would be to rid ourselves of the Senate. Of course that would
involve opening the Constitution so we can discuss Quebec for ten or twenty years, anyone really
want to go there?