CNN wasn't the only network feeling the heat. CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and a CBC affiliate have come under fire for failing to protect the identity of the rape victim.

I've had drunken romps, but I've never transported an unconscious girl from one party to the next while taking advantage of her unconsciousness. That's just wrong, and where I come from you're very likely going to get hurt, and very likely very badly. Though high school athletics in my home town isn't as big as football in the US.

Hey, don't get me wrong, they definitely crossed a line, but you do realize they were convicted because they tried to 'finger' her, right?
.

Hey, don't get me wrong, they definitely crossed a line, but you do realize they were convicted because they tried to 'finger' her, right?
I don't know what condition she was in when that occurred.
At least that's what I got from the write up on the verdict.

I really am not in the mood to go read the details of someone's rape today. There are days where I just can't.
But I have to ask you about this.... did they not succeed? How do you 'try' to 'finger' someone?

The uproar is the reporters were all concerned about the boys life ahead and nothing about the girls state of mind and emotional health.
This girl has received threats of violence and I think death was also mentioned.

The uproar is the reporters were all concerned about the boys life ahead and nothing about the girls state of mind and emotional health.
This girl has received threats of violence and I think death was also mentioned.

I was reading online the other day that they've charged two girls from the high school for making threats I guess, can't remember the wording, but it amounts to spreading gossip/lies/innuendo about the girl and regarding the rape.
And the biggest furor I've seen, although I've not delved too much into it, was the town itself (school admin, the city/town officials, the police) were accused of looking the other way because the entire scene involved some local football heroes.
So it's been "that kind of a case" from the get go.

You know me, you know I love reading court transcripts, but I can assure, I hate reading those kind of briefs on a good day, I hear you.
Don't know, it's pretty vague. The article I just read on the decision just said 'tried'.

I guess I just found it an odd statement because here if you 'try' to stick something in a woman, it doesn't really matter what it was you tried to stick in her. There's no legally acceptable range of things you can violate a woman with. So, 'tried' to 'finger', seems like a major attempt at minimizing what happened in light of them 'actually' being convicted of rape.
Either they violated her, or they didn't. And what they did it with seems pretty irrelevant. And yes, I have a hard time believing they were somehow unsuccessful in being able to do what they were 'trying' to do.

In my experience, the larger the number of participants who took part in or excused a crime, the more a community will try to rally to protect the largest number of kids possible.
What's one girl compared to the many kids who saw, excused, viewed, or participated in, the rape and its ensuing video and photos?
If you say it was rape, suddenly half your student body are rapists/criminals.

But only two are taking the brunt of the punishment.
Something else that smells.

If I recall 3 involved were given immunity for testifying. . Karrie's point is valid about the numbers, how people will react when it is a large group, small town who loves their football team.
So what smell are you getting?

I don't know guys, from what's available, other than filming it and posting it online, how many of you guys can say you've never had a drunken romp?

Theoretically, since everybody was underage, anybody who watched it could be charged with kiddie porn could they not?