Security guard charged after accidentally shooting off own *****


spaminator
+2
#1
Security guard charged after accidentally shooting off own *****

QMI Agency

First posted: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 09:28 AM EST | Updated: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 01:14 PM EST

Gun (Fotolia)

A security guard in Trinidad and Tobago was charged with illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition after he accidentally shot off his own *****.
Police in the Caribbean island nation said they were called at around 8 a.m. Sunday by a resident of Rio Claro who heard a gunshot coming from a parked car, the Trinidad and Tobago Guardian newspaper reported.
When they arrived at the scene, police found a 33-year-old man slumped behind the car's steering wheel, bleeding from his groin. Police said officers found a .38-calibre gun with four rounds of ammunition in the man's front right pocket, the Guardian reported.
The man was taken to hospital and placed under police guard.
Police said he didn't have a licence for the weapon, the Guardian reported.

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/01/23...-off-own-*****
 
Spade
+2
#2
Should have been wearing protection...
 
Goober
+2
#3
He was a D*i*c*k*. He had a D*i*c*k*. He is no longer a D*i*c*k*. And is missing his D*i*c*k*.
My heart goes out to Jane.
 
Ron in Regina
+2
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by spaminatorView Post

Security guard charged after accidentally shooting off own *****

...& then he was charged. Talk about adding insult to injury.
 
Goober
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by Ron in ReginaView Post

...& then he was charged. Talk about adding insult to injury.

Stupid is as stupid does.Bet he won't do that again. Heard they are hard to transplant.
 
Ron in Regina
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Stupid is as stupid does.Bet he won't do that again. Heard they are hard to transplant.

Unless the guy had more than one, I have to agree that he won't do that again.
Call it a life lesson.
 
SLM
+1
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by SpadeView Post

Should have been wearing protection...

A condom won't protect against bullets. Pretty sure it says so right on the package.
 
PoliticalNick
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Stupid is as stupid does.Bet he won't do that again. Heard they are hard to transplant.

Especially when they have been blown off.
 
Goober
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by Ron in ReginaView Post

Unless the guy had more than one, I have to agree that he won't do that again.
Call it a life lesson.

He had an illegal weapon- clearly did not know D-i-c-k all about safe handling- Now he is fuked- ooopps - past tense used to get fuked.
Guess he will be in the market for a strap on.
 
Ron in Regina
+5
#10  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

A condom won't protect against bullets. Pretty sure it says so right on the package.

Perhaps something a bit more...industrial?

 
Goober
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by Ron in ReginaView Post

Perhaps something a bit more...industrial?

 
taxslave
+1
#12
Maybe he should go to Snap-On tools.
 
WLDB
+1
#13
No need to arrest him. He punished himself enough. I doubt he'll re-offend.
 
JLM
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Stupid is as stupid does.Bet he won't do that again. Heard they are hard to transplant.

Bet Mr. Bobbitt could teach him a thing or two!
 
Goober
+1
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by WLDBView Post

No need to arrest him. He punished himself enough. I doubt he'll re-offend.

I guess you can say he is Pecker Free.
 
Cliffy
+2
#16
Woman Fights Robber, Cops Have to Rescue Him! - YouTube
 
Sal
#17
lol....wow
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

A condom won't protect against bullets. Pretty sure it says so right on the package.

He needed bullet proof condoms.

Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

Pretty sure it says so right on the package.

I doubt it says it on the package and maybe if he was wearing one, some lawyer would launch a lawsuit. This would mean it would be a warning on the box in the future.
 

Similar Threads

10
Is security guard a good job? from your point of view??
by Giraldi_Theirrey | Jul 13th, 2004
no new posts