Should Religions be entitled to Tax Exempt Status


Durry
#1
Property owned by religious groups and income gathered by religious groups are mostly Tax Exempt.

But should they be Tax Exempt if they are going to get involved in such things as voicing their positions on political issues or environmental issues?? Are they crossing the line from being a religious group to advocacy group?

What about the Muslim religion, some say the qran is not a religious book but a philosophy of life book??
 
PoliticalNick
#2
Quote: Originally Posted by DurryView Post

Property owned by religious groups and income gathered by religious groups are mostly Tax Exempt.

But should they be Tax Exempt if they are going to get involved in such things as voicing their positions on political issues or environmental issues?? Are they crossing the line from being a religious group to advocacy group?

What about the Muslim religion, some say the qran is not a religious book but a philosophy of life book??

They are all private 'clubs' just like a private golf course or the like and therefore should pay taxes on their assets and income. Some may do some wonderful charity work but for the most part they just fleece the flock and let the top bananas live in luxury. Let them deduct any provable charity costs and pay tax on the rest.
 
The Old Medic
#3
Until the 20th Century, all churches were heavily involved in political campaigns. There is absolutely no reason why they should be prohibited from being involved.
 
TenPenny
+3
#4  Top Rated Post
I think churches should be as political as they want to be, and they should pay taxes like any other organization. There's no reason they should be tax exempt.
 
L Gilbert
#5
lol This is a big can of worms.

Interesting info here; http://atheism.about.com/od/churchestaxexemptions/Tax_Exempt_Churches_Religious_Freedom_vs_Tax_Exemp tions.htm
 
JLM
#6
Absolutely................if the proponents want to make it up out of their own pockets!
 
tay
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by DurryView Post

Property owned by religious groups and income gathered by religious groups are mostly Tax Exempt.

But should they be Tax Exempt if they are going to get involved in such things as voicing their positions on political issues or environmental issues?? Are they crossing the line from being a religious group to advocacy group?

What about the Muslim religion, some say the qran is not a religious book but a philosophy of life book??



Did you forget to post something?
 
PoliticalNick
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

lol This is a big can of worms.

Interesting info here; http://atheism.about.com/od/churchestaxexemptions/Tax_Exempt_Churches_Religious_Freedom_vs_Tax_Exemp tions.htm

Quote:

Thus, the exact nature or purpose of a charitable organization remains open and variable, but one constant remains which unites the class: the general benefit of the public and society.

I would argue based on the historical evidence that organized religion of any type is in no way beneficial to the public or society. It does little besides create division and derision and has been the root cause of so many killing and wars you could never say it was a benefit to society in general. Therefore they should have no tax exemptions at all.
 
gerryh
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNickView Post

I would argue based on the historical evidence that organized religion of any type is in no way beneficial to the public or society. It does little besides create division and derision and has been the root cause of so many killing and wars you could never say it was a benefit to society in general. Therefore they should have no tax exemptions at all.

 
PoliticalNick
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

That all you got for an intelligent response G?
 
WLDB
#11
They're a business like any other. Tax them.
 
JLM
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNickView Post

I would argue based on the historical evidence that organized religion of any type is in no way beneficial to the public or society. It does little besides create division and derision and has been the root cause of so many killing and wars you could never say it was a benefit to society in general. Therefore they should have no tax exemptions at all.

You might want to tell that to the chaps at Salvation Army!
 
PoliticalNick
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

You might want to tell that to the chaps at Salvation Army!

There may be a few good people who do good deeds in the name of their religion, I will gladly agree with that but these tend to be people who would help their fellow man even if religion didn't exist.

I am talking about the idea of a single dogmatic view and theory that one group who believes in some ancient fairy tales is right and that all the other group's fairy tales are wrong. This is what religion is and it has been used to incite and justify many mass murders throughout history. The thing with religion is there is absolutely NO TRUTH in any of them. Other than a few actual places we have zero provable reliability in any of the books or teachings of any religion. To me it is therefore the biggest waste of human time and effort to ever appear on this planet and the arguments over who is right in their particular theory may have led to many wars and will lead to many more and yet not one will ever be proven correct.
 
WLDB
+1
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Absolutely................if the proponents want to make it up out of their own pockets!

Wont cost me a dime. I havent given a religious institution so much as a penny since I was a child. When I do donate to charities they are not religious ones.
 
JLM
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNickView Post

There may be a few good people who do good deeds in the name of their religion, I will gladly agree with that but these tend to be people who would help their fellow man even if religion didn't exist.

I am talking about the idea of a single dogmatic view and theory that one group who believes in some ancient fairy tales is right and that all the other group's fairy tales are wrong. This is what religion is and it has been used to incite and justify many mass murders throughout history. The thing with religion is there is absolutely NO TRUTH in any of them. Other than a few actual places we have zero provable reliability in any of the books or teachings of any religion. To me it is therefore the biggest waste of human time and effort to ever appear on this planet and the arguments over who is right in their particular theory may have led to many wars and will lead to many more and yet not one will ever be proven correct.

There is a lot of bullsh*t for sure, but to say there is ABSOLUTELY no truth is a bit of stretch. There are theologians who are intelligent and wise men/women and to dismiss everything they say is a little presumpuous to say the least. While the masses may dismiss them in ordinary times, the number drops in times of crisis, when reassurance and comfort are needed.

Quote: Originally Posted by WLDBView Post

Wont cost me a dime. I havent given a religious institution so much as a penny since I was a child. When I do donate to charities they are not religious ones.

For the most efficient use of your donation you may want to consider Salvation Army. They are not judgmental when it comes to giving help.
 
PoliticalNick
+1
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

There is a lot of bullsh*t for sure, but to say there is ABSOLUTELY no truth is a bit of stretch. There are theologians who are intelligent and wise men/women and to dismiss everything they say is a little presumpuous to say the least. While the masses may dismiss them in ordinary times, the number drops in times of crisis, when reassurance and comfort are needed.

Not a stretch at all. Gather all your educated, intelligent theologians together and sit with them for a few months and between the bunch of you please PROVE just one event in the bible, or Torah, or Quran or any other religious book. If you cannot prove the event then any writing about it has to be considered untrue and unreliable, nothing but uncorroborated heresay, and since religion requires blind faith and actually shuns the idea of evidenciary proof all of it is lies! There is no other logical interpretation.
 
JLM
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNickView Post

Not a stretch at all. Gather all your educated, intelligent theologians together and sit with them for a few months and between the bunch of you please PROVE just one event in the bible, or Torah, or Quran or any other religious book. If you cannot prove the event then any writing about it has to be considered untrue and unreliable, nothing but uncorroborated heresay, and since religion requires blind faith and actually shuns the idea of evidenciary proof all of it is lies! There is no other logical interpretation.

I'm not knowledgable enough about it to argue other than in a general way, but perhaps you'd like to comment on the Dead Sea Scrolls!
 
PoliticalNick
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

I'm not knowledgable enough about it to argue other than in a general way, but perhaps you'd like to comment on the Dead Sea Scrolls!

What about them. They are a bunch of apparently ancient texts apparently found in a cave. They seem to be accepted in the christian community as gospel truth and proof of christ etc, yadda-yadda, etc... but really what do they prove...nothing. There is no way to tell if they are a true history or an equivalent to Grimm's Fairy Tales. All you have is some old parchment with old writing that tells a story which may or may not be true. Until you find the guy that wrote them and ask him directly or find some hard evidence proving their truth you have to accept them on faith, and I have zero faith in a group of guys in burlap sacks asking me to believe in some dude in the clouds who runs the universe and wants me to give said burlap wearing guys 20% of my earnings every Sunday.
 
JLM
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNickView Post

What about them. They are a bunch of apparently ancient texts apparently found in a cave. They seem to be accepted in the christian community as gospel truth and proof of christ etc, yadda-yadda, etc... but really what do they prove...nothing. There is no way to tell if they are a true history or an equivalent to Grimm's Fairy Tales. All you have is some old parchment with old writing that tells a story which may or may not be true. Until you find the guy that wrote them and ask him directly or find some hard evidence proving their truth you have to accept them on faith, and I have zero faith in a group of guys in burlap sacks asking me to believe in some dude in the clouds who runs the universe and wants me to give said burlap wearing guys 20% of my earnings every Sunday.

I thought it was 10%............................a tithe!
 
PoliticalNick
+1
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

I thought it was 10%............................a tithe!

Maybe....depends on the cult you are part of I guess. Family friends became 'born again' a few years back, they are expected.to give 25% of their gross income to support the church.

What I want explaining is if god is all powerful and controls the entire universe why does he need the human invention of cash? And isn't money also the 'root of all evil'? Why would god want any of that? Maybe it's just the church that is evil? Or the people who run the church and want your money are evil.
 
gerryh
+1
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNickView Post

That all you got for an intelligent response G?


The stupidity of what I quoted is all it is worth.

Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNickView Post


What I want explaining is if god is all powerful and controls the entire universe why does he need the human invention of cash? And isn't money also the 'root of all evil'? Why would god want any of that? Maybe it's just the church that is evil? Or the people who run the church and want your money are evil.


He doesn't need the human invention of cash. It's so sad that you don't have the where with all to differentiate between what "man" says is required and what God actually does require. It's very typical of the limited brain capacity of the atheist breed.
 
PoliticalNick
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

The stupidity of what I quoted is all it is worth.




He doesn't need the human invention of cash. It's so sad that you don't have the where with all to differentiate between what "man" says is required and what God actually does require. It's very typical of the limited brain capacity of the atheist breed.

As soon as God tells me what he requires I might take it under advisement. Until then it is ALL what man says god wants and totally unreliable and unbelievable and that is what the church is worth...

I am not an athiest fyi, paternally Anglican Christian and Maternally Jewish.
 
gerryh
+2
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNickView Post

As soon as God tells me what he requires I might take it under advisement. Until then it is ALL what man says god wants and totally unreliable and unbelievable and that is what the church is worth...


Then stop blaming shyte on God.

You sound like wizard when it comes to the police/judges/government.

Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNickView Post

I am not an athiest fyi, paternally Anglican Christian and Maternally Jewish.


I really don't give a rats *** what you were brought up under or what your family history is. You speak like an atheist that doesn't believe in God.
 
PoliticalNick
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

Then stop blaming shyte on God.

You sound like wizard when it comes to the police/judges/government.

OK, you do kinda have me there that 'religion' and all the bullsh*t that goes along with it are a human creation...no need to gloat too much


Quote:

I really don't give a rats *** what you were brought up under or what your family history is. You speak like an atheist that doesn't believe in God.

I don't believe anything that can't be proven. You cannot prove God so I don't really believe. I don't know if that makes me atheist or agnostic or just plain old logical and I don't care.
 
TenPenny
+2
#25
If 'God' is all powerful, he doesn't need our tax money to keep up his club.
 
JLM
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by PoliticalNickView Post




I don't believe anything that can't be proven. You cannot prove God so I don't really believe. I don't know if that makes me atheist or agnostic or just plain old logical and I don't care.

Proof is different things to different people.

Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

If 'God' is all powerful, he doesn't need our tax money to keep up his club.

Right on, I think His "proponents" get most of the money!
 
PoliticalNick
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Proof is different things to different people.

No, actually proof is proof all the time. Unless you are gullible and then proof can be anything...in which case I will prove to you red is really green and have some fun watching you at traffic lights.
 
DaSleeper
+1
#28

former prime minister jean chretien explains - YouTube

 
earth_as_one
#29
Yes they should because of their community service and charity. Religion has a net beneficial effect on society. Religions should be able to voice their dogma, but they if they endorse politicians or political parties they should loose their charitable status.
 
gopher
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by DurryView Post

Property owned by religious groups and income gathered by religious groups are mostly Tax Exempt.

But should they be Tax Exempt if they are going to get involved in such things as voicing their positions on political issues or environmental issues?? Are they crossing the line from being a religious group to advocacy group?

What about the Muslim religion, some say the qran is not a religious book but a philosophy of life book??


You raise two issues but I will only address the first.

A 501(c)3 organization loses its tax exempt status if it engages in political lobbying under the Internal Revenue Code. That's how it should always remain.
 
no new posts