Aboriginal status leads to refusal of extradition

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
Another young, uneducated aboriginal person going nowhere. This is a benefit I could not receive, so it is not equal or fair. This race based law is detrimental to peace, order and good government. The judge, and judges before him are wrong.

Even many aboriginal women are against healing circles because most of the violence is conducted by men against women and men get off easy. This too is unjust.




Aboriginal status leads to refusal of extradition | The Chronicle Herald


Aboriginal status leads to refusal of extradition



TORONTO — Ontario’s top court ruled Friday that two men should not be extradited to the United States to face drug charges because of their aboriginal status.

“It would be contrary to the principles of fundamental justice” to send the men to the U.S., where their heritage would not be factored in to sentencing, the way it is in Canada, the Appeal Court ruled.

Factors under what is known as the Gladue principle are considered in Canadian law to try to offset systemic discrimination against aboriginal people.

The justice minister didn’t properly take these factors into account when he ordered Zachary Leonard and Rejean Gionet extradited, and for that he was wrong, the court ruled.

Leonard, a young member of the Rainy River First Nations with no criminal record, was arrested at a U.S. border crossing in 2006 when the van in which he was a passenger was found to be carrying 46,000 ecstasy pills.

If he is prosecuted in the U.S. he could face 19 years in prison.

Given his age, lack of a record, peripheral alleged involvement in the crime, his aboriginal status and steps he has taken to rehabilitate himself since then, he might not receive any jail time in Canada, the court said.

Gionet, a member of the Ginogaming First Nation, was allegedly involved in importing oxycodone into the U.S. from Canada in 2003 and 2004.

In the U.S. he would face six or seven years if he pleaded guilty and up to 10 years if convicted after a trial. In Canada, the sentence range is three to five years and he has already spent 3 1/2 years in custody.

Gladue, a Supreme Court of Canada decision from 1999, stated that factors such as dislocation and high unemployment combined with bias and systemic racism have contributed to the “grossly disproportionate” incarceration of aboriginal people.

It does not amount to reverse discrimination in the form of automatically lighter sentences or a “get out of jail free” card, the Appeal Court said.

But the courts in Canada must consider aboriginal heritage as a factor in sentencing because equality does not necessarily mean equal treatment, the court said.

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson “refused to apply the Gladue principle,” the Appeal Court ruled and quashed the extradition orders.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
WTF?

Automatic lighter sentences is not reverse discrimination? Sure sounds like it to me. Equality does not mean equal treatment? Does this moron own a dictionary or thesaurus? This idiot judge has just publicly told all natives its ok to commit crimes because we will just pat you on the head and and give you a free pass.

46,000 ecstasy pills doesn't deserve jail? Sorry judge but 19 years might not be enough. If even 1/2% do harm to the user that's 230 people in hospital or dead even.

I always thought smuggling was one of those crimes that was supposed to get harsh punishment. This is just way too far out there to be funny. They aren't in trouble for shoplifting a hershey bar. This is major drug smuggling.

I'm at a loss. The judge, or panel, might just be in need of a pink slip and a severe beating.

Just dumbfounded! I don't get it.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
This race based law is detrimental to peace, order and good government.
Actually, it isn't.

Public interest is still the primary consideration in the Gladue principle.

Since public interest is pretty much the fundamental principle of criminal law, Gladue is following the law.

Criminal justice isn't about revenge, it's about correcting abhorrent behavior and protecting the public. Hence in the publics interest.

Even many aboriginal women are against healing circles because most of the violence is conducted by men against women and men get off easy. This too is unjust.
Healing circles are merely one part of entire diversion plan. There are whole lists of requirements for offenders to either participate in or adhere to.

Perhaps you should read about the Glague process before you talk about it.

Automatic lighter sentences is not reverse discrimination?
No such thing as automatic lighter sentences.

Sure sounds like it to me.
Then you should stop reading dumpsters posts and read this...

Supreme Court of Canada - Decisions - R. v. Gladue

Community based justice programs are nothing new. See the Youth Justice Act, the Young Offenders Act, or community service sentences.

I don't get it.
That's nothing new.
 
Last edited:

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
Another bad piece of law from the bench.

We just keep letting aboriginals commit crime after crime and it's okay, because they are given more consideration by the justice system that is lost in the woods. This is not a good principle.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Healing Circles = Good
Sharia Law = Bad

IMO, we either have one criminal justice system that applies to everyone equally, or the rules that allow First Nation criminals to face justice by a healing circle should also apply to other groups with their own justice system like Muslims with their Sharia Law.

For the record, I support one criminal justice system that applies to everyone equally regardless of race or religion. First Nation criminals can go through the healing circle process after they've been processed by Canada's criminal justice system.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Healing Circles = Good
Sharia Law = Bad

IMO, we either have one criminal justice system that applies to everyone equally, or the rules that allow First Nation criminals to face justice by a healing circle should also apply to other groups with their own justice system like Muslims with their Sharia Law.

For the record, I support one criminal justice system that applies to everyone equally regardless of race or religion. First Nation criminals can go through the healing circle process after they've been processed by Canada's criminal justice system.

The Gladue principle does not apply to whether or not you are found guilty of any given offense. It effects only sentencing. Sharia is a different set of laws. They aren't the same thing, even remotely.

As well, the Gladue principle is a direct result, whether we want to say it outright or not, of the fact that the Canadian government has perpetrated, in the eyes of the world, genocidal acts upon its first nations peoples, and having a statistically larger prison population of natives underscores the history of race inequality.

Canadian law is not based on retribution and doing a person maximum damage, it is based on rehabilitation and keeping the populace safe. Applying the Gladue principle to offenders doesn't negate that, and it's also not out of step with the way many white people are sentenced anyway.

Our prison systems long reflected the fact that without a prior history, with a community support system in place, and without posing a huge risk to the public, judges would trust white people to serve a variety of sentences...community services, rehabs, etc. We didn't need it spelled out in the law. This principle merely asks judges to consider a potential imbalance when sentencing.
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
Canada has done virtually everything possible to exterminate it's Native people's. They have attempted to destroy their cultures, they have literally destroyed their ancestral lands and rights, and they still discriminate against all of the native peoples of Canada.

Even following Supreme Court decisions, the Government still refuses to recognize any rights to the Métis, because they maintain that when they "granted" Manitoba Script" (which was worthless) to the Métis, they extinguished all rights they may have had as a people. The Federal Government, and almost all Provincial governments still fight against establishing any rights to the Métis.


Part of the Treaty of Paris, which ended the Revolutionary War, and established the USA and Canada as separate entities, was that all aboriginal peoples would have the right to cross the borders between the two areas, without passports and without taxes on their goods and chattels. This was reestablished in the treaty ending the War of 1812.

Canada absolutely refuses to honor those clauses. No American "Indian" is allowed to enter Canada freely, to seek work, etc. without a permit and a passport. They are taxed on any goods brought into the country. Any Canadian Indian that purchases goods in the USA and returns to Canada is also assessed duties.

The USA still honors those rights for Canadian Indians however, so long as they are 50% or more native. They can come to the USA, get a Social Security Card and work, without ever getting a "Green Card". They can also move all of their household possession into the USA without any duties. The Canadian Supreme Court has held that those treaties are meaningless, since the Canadian government never established any specific legislation implementing ay of the clauses. [By their interpretation, a State of War still exists between the USA and Canada.]

But, if Natives move back to Canada, they are assessed duties on those same household goods, unless they can prove that they were bought in Canada!

These are just TWO of the many areas where Canada still exercises massive discrimination against its Native peoples.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Another bad piece of law from the bench.

We just keep letting aboriginals commit crime after crime and it's okay, because they are given more consideration by the justice system that is lost in the woods. This is not a good principle.

You speak of principles yet have a well known hatred for First Nations. What a Wanker.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Another bad piece of law from the bench.
The "bench" doesn't create law.

We just keep letting aboriginals commit crime after crime and it's okay...
No it isn't.

This is not a good principle.
It's an excellent principle that non natives have had access to for centuries, and still do.

Just because you're poorly educated on what is available in the criminal justice system, doesn't make the Gladue principle 'not good'.

Healing Circles = Good
Sharia Law = Bad
Ummm...

Healing circles are merely one part of entire diversion plan. There are whole lists of requirements for offenders to either participate in or adhere to.

Beyond that, comparing a Healing Circle to Sharia Law is idiotic.

IMO, we either have one criminal justice system that applies to everyone equally, or the rules that allow First Nation criminals to face justice by a healing circle should also apply to other groups with their own justice system like Muslims with their Sharia Law.
I know you have trouble with reality, especially when you think you can get a dig in on me. But the fact is, as stated above.
For the record, I support one criminal justice system that applies to everyone equally regardless of race or religion.
No you don't.

First Nation criminals can go through the healing circle process after they've been processed by Canada's criminal justice system.
I guess it's safe to say this is another topic you know little about, lol.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Hatred of FNs? Not so. We're judge getting made law on this issue because the lawyers see money here. An endless subsidy like many other businesses get in Canada.

Oh we are well aware of what your idea is of Treaties that Canada and First Nations have signed. EAO hates Jews - you hate Aboriginals.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Yes so, lol.

Really? I can and have argued in front of a Judge, invoked Gladue and didn't charge a cent.

You really need to get out more.

LOL, you really are stretching now.

So just where do you stand on someone involved in smuggling 46,000 ecstasy pills? Gladue still ok for you there or would you maybe think a little jail time is in order. Remember now if it was a bad batch that could be a lot of dead bodies.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
Oh we are well aware of what your idea is of Treaties that Canada and First Nations have signed. EAO hates Jews - you hate Aboriginals.

To be more precise, I hate laws that are unequal. The country does not need laws like this. We already have Occupy because of financial inequality, adding political equality for me is a non-starter.

I don't have to like anyone. Those who say, "You're a hater." I find so lame, so weak. Always trying to shut down a discussion that makes your head spin. Can't participate? Just shout hate. Will work against you. The Human Wrongs Tribunals are fading away. Lawyers like fear and ignorance. Keeps the money flowing.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Not only don't I hate anyone based on race or religion, I find the concept difficult to understand. How can anyone hate someone based on race or religion? That baffles me. I can understand how you can hate or dislike someone based on their actions. I support freedom of religion and multiculturalism. I've never written a negative comment about any race or religion.

I admit I don't like individuals who commit war criminals and commit crimes against humanity. I don't think Canada should treat one group of war criminals differently than another but we do... based on race/religion.

I wouldn't say I hate any First Nation person. I would say there is only one First Nation person that I don't like ...but it has nothing to to with them being First Nation people and everything to do with them being a rude and nasty asshole who slanders others with false accusations and deliberate lies in an attempt to pin defamatory labels on them... Is that too subtle???

Regarding healing circles... I am against substituting a healing circle punishment for one handed out by the criminal justice system. First Nation criminals can submit themselves to a healing circle after they've done their time in the criminal justice system.

But if you accept that healing circles can hand out punishment, then you should also accept that Muslims can also get punishment based on Sharia law.

Regarding historical and present injustices suffered by First Nation people. I support fair and just compensation for past wrongs as well as settling land claims in a fair and just manner. I support free post secondary education, subsidized housing, free health and dental care, preferential hiring (all other factors equal, the First Nation candidate gets the job) and other incentives to help raise First Nations people with potential who deserve assistance out of poverty. But I don't support giving First Nation criminals preferential treatment, lighter sentences or the ability to opt out of the criminal justice system.
 
Last edited:

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Not only don't I hate anyone based on race or religion, I find the concept difficult to understand. How can anyone hate someone based on race or religion? That baffles me.

I can understand how you can hate or dislike someone based on their actions. I wouldn't say I hate any First Nation person. I would say there is only one First Nation person that I don't like ...but it has nothing to to with them being First Nation people and everything to do with them being a rude and nasty asshole who slanders others with false accusations and deliberate lies in an attempt to pin defamatory labels on them... Is that too subtle???

Regarding healing circles... I am against substituting a healing circle punishment for one handed out by the criminal justice system. First Nation criminals can submit themselves to a healing circle after they've done their time in the criminal justice system.

Not according to the SCoC of Canada. The Gladue ruling does not apply to any other the First nations persons.
Then you state that First nations must be punished twice - First by the Justice System and then be First Nations-
Read the ruling- It states why quite clearly -
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
I read the summary, I get the idea and I disagree with it.

My understanding is that Gladue has nothing to do with First Nations people being here first. It has to do with the damage the Canadian government caused by historical and current injustices. That may be true, but I disagree with this as an excuse or cause for leniency regarding criminal activity ie: smuggling drugs, assaulting someone, stealing, rape...

This ruling gives preferential treatment to First Nation criminals. I agree with judges taking into account the circumstances of First Nation criminals as well as any criminal that they sentence. That's why they are called Judges... and I support Judges being able to use judgement...

I only support preferential treatment of First Nations people who have demonstrated potential (by getting through high school) and respect the law. I disagree with race/religious based parallel justice systems. The law (including appropriate sentences from crimes) should apply to everyone equally.
 
Last edited: