Mulcair compares oilsands to toxic waste site


Locutus
+1
#1
Neckbeard speaks again.


Opposition leader Thomas Mulcair expanded his attack on Western Canada's resource industries, comparing the oilsands to Sydney's tar ponds - a notorious toxic waste site in Nova Scotia.

During a debate on the economy Thursday, Conservative MP Chris Warkentin accused the NDP leader of wanting to "go after industry in my province of Alberta" by putting a price on carbon emissions.


That's when Mulcair mentioned the mess left by the coke ovens of Cape Breton steel plants.


more from this idiot:


Sun News : Mulcair compares oilsands to toxic waste site
 
Corduroy
+1
#2
Drink a glass of oil and tell me it's not toxic. Oh wait, you won't be able to tell me because you'd be dead.
 
Goober
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by CorduroyView Post

Drink a glass of oil and tell me it's not toxic. Oh wait, you won't be able to tell me because you'd be dead.

So is Drano- Look around your house, apartment and then check and see how much off gassing of chemicals result- from your CPU to your fire retardant chairs, sofa- then what a person uses to clean their house. Oh yes and the paint on the walls- likely high in VOC.

Case Study 2.1?The Sydney tar ponds?One of Canada's largest and most contaminated sites

Sydney Tar Ponds Agency looking for green space bidders - Nova Scotia - CBC News

Radon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Household Chemicals Chart: Whats in my House?
 
Corduroy
#4
I don't understand why you thought it was important to make a list of toxic things.
 
petros
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by CorduroyView Post

Drink a glass of oil and tell me it's not toxic. Oh wait, you won't be able to tell me because you'd be dead.

Things are different today....

C16H13ClN2O

Mothers Little Helper Rolling Stones w lyrics - YouTube




 
Goober
+1
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by CorduroyView Post

I don't understand why you thought it was important to make a list of toxic things.

It was for those that are not aware of the chemical soup just inside their house. As to the oil sands - they are not going away. In my opinion they have improved in the reduction mix of chemicals produced - water used has been reduced - land reclamation is still coming along slowly but that will increase- these are 50 year plants- so they will be always updating their ability to lower cost per barrel.
 
BruSan
#7
So why do you think Mulcair is busily going about making his party irrelevant in all but the province of Quebec?

Does Pauline the Peril believe she's up to the competition he's going to give her to be the head honcho?

This should be fun to watch; one stuffed shirt self destructing and one lady ( perhaps not) miming a puffer fish.
Last edited by BruSan; Sep 21st, 2012 at 06:55 PM..
 
lone wolf
#8
Too bad they hadn't noted the words "left over" - like brown fields left behind when any industry closes - so the comment might have been taken in context instead of a red flag for people looking for fight
 
skookumchuck
#9
Does Mulcair have no issues with the hundreds of thousands of acres of land and trees that were lost when hydro Quebec started building Dams to sell power to the US? How many carbon credits do his Quebec hypocrite buddies lose for that?
How about the huge open pit mines in Quebec and heavy metal pollution? They bear no resemblance to the oil sands eh?
 
mentalfloss
#10
MacLean's has an absolutely glowing review of Mulcair. His face is plastered on the cover of every mag this month.
 
Goober
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

MacLean's has an absolutely glowing review of Mulcair. His face is plastered on the cover of every mag this month.

And the point is......
 
mentalfloss
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

And the point is......

He's not the idiot shlup the OP presents him as?
 
taxslave
+4
#13  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

He's not the idiot shlup the OP presents him as?

Oh yes he is. As well as a threat to democracy and the economy.
 
BruSan
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by skookumchuckView Post

Does Mulcair have no issues with the hundreds of thousands of acres of land and trees that were lost when hydro Quebec started building Dams to sell power to the US? How many carbon credits do his Quebec hypocrite buddies lose for that?
How about the huge open pit mines in Quebec and heavy metal pollution? They bear no resemblance to the oil sands eh?

Not to mention the Asbestos mines that the federal government took all kinds of flack over on the world stage just to keep Quebec appeased. Now ole puffer fish has taken the heat off so we can all bury that nightmare of a blight.
 
Nuggler
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

MacLean's has an absolutely glowing review of Mulcair. His face is plastered on the cover of every mag this month.


If his pic is on one issue of MacLeans, it's bound to be on them all.


HE may lose my vote.
 
skookumchuck
+4
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

He's not the idiot shlup the OP presents him as?

You do not have to be an idiot to be a hypocrite, or a Quebec flunky, but it sure helps.
 
mentalfloss
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslaveView Post

Oh yes he is. As well as a threat to democracy and the economy.

The fact that you got three greenies for this proves the right partisan bent of this forum, lol
 
TenPenny
+1
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslaveView Post

Oh yes he is. As well as a threat to democracy and the economy.

A threat to democracy?

Wow, you've taken the koolaid to heart in concentrated doses.
 
petros
+2
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

The fact that you got three greenies for this proves the right partisan bent of this forum, lol

Four and I'm no rightie or leftie.
 
CDNBear
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

The fact that you got three greenies for this proves the right partisan bent of this forum, lol

Actually, by your own metrics, taxslave is right, lol.

Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

A threat to democracy?

According to Flossy he is.
 
mentalfloss
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

Four and I'm no rightie or leftie.

No, you're just bat**** insane.
 
CDNBear
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

No, you're just bat**** insane.

That's probably why his opinion and yours would be the same, if Mulcair wasn't in the equation, lol.
 
JLM
#23
As with most waste sites it's wise to extract anything of value!

Quote: Originally Posted by CorduroyView Post

I don't understand why you thought it was important to make a list of toxic things.

Possibly just to demonstrate the value of them.
 
taxslave
+1
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

A threat to democracy?

Wow, you've taken the koolaid to heart in concentrated doses.

Much experience with the BC NDP has proved that they are not much interested in democracy but more in forcing every one to accept their way.

Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

The fact that you got three greenies for this proves the right partisan bent of this forum, lol

As opposed too the wrong partisan bent?
 
JLM
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslaveView Post

Much experience with the BC NDP has proved that they are not much interested in democracy but more in forcing every one to accept their way.

Did you get their questionaire in the mail recently? I filled mine out in such a way I hope he finds discouraging!
 
Goober
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalflossView Post

The fact that you got three greenies for this proves the right partisan bent of this forum, lol

Can Con has 25,000 or so members and he got 4 greens.
 
JLM
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Can Con has 25,000 or so members and he got 4 greens.

How many active members? 100?
 
Goober
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

How many active members? 100?

Many do not come into certain threads. But let us say the 100 is correct- that is then 4 %- I smell a massive landslide for Mulcair based on those numbers.
 
#juan
#29
http://www.vancouverobserver.com/sit...arSands3_1.jpg

I worked in Fort McMurray on the first GCOS tar sands refinery for over a year and you know, the whole place stunk of oil, birds were dying in the tailing ponds, and it was a toxic waste site. The trucks hauling the raw sand to the refinery spilled it every where. Virtually the whole site was covered in the smelly, raw oil sands. This was the first refinery and I understand the new sites are better...not much better, but better.
 
skookumchuck
+1
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by #juanView Post

http://www.vancouverobserver.com/sit...arSands3_1.jpg

I worked in Fort McMurray on the first GCOS tar sands refinery for over a year and you know, the whole place stunk of oil, birds were dying in the tailing ponds, and it was a toxic waste site. The trucks hauling the raw sand to the refinery spilled it every where. Virtually the whole site was covered in the smelly, raw oil sands. This was the first refinery and I understand the new sites are better...not much better, but better.

I damn near got killed due to an H2s leak on the Coker fractionator towers in '66. I was in the GCOS process plant for startup.
 
no new posts