Landmark ruling on Canada's prostitution laws due today


Goober
#31
Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

who cares, it's just about a bunch of old *****s anyhow..

Glad to know what you think of people not as well off as yourself.
 
B00Mer
#32
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Glad to know what you think of people not as well off as yourself.

aaagh, yeah right.

People have choices, it's called personal responsibility.

I didn't force those girls to spread their legs, I may have paid for a few in the past.. but that's because I'm a horny horn dog.
 
SLM
#33
Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

who cares, it's just about a bunch of old *****s anyhow..

You are a charming, charming individual. Please say that aloud with excessive, dripping sarcasm.

Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Glad to know what you think of people not as well off as yourself.

This is not new, just so long as you don't call women dogs as that's quite offensive.

Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

aaagh, yeah right.

People have choices, it's called personal responsibility.

I didn't force those girls to spread their legs, I may have paid for a few in the past.. but that's because I'm a horny horn dog.

For someone who got so bent out of shape about someone showing disrespect to women, you sure do show a lot of disrespect to women.

What a grade A hypocrite you are turning out to be.
 
wizard
-1
#34
... this ruling is completely illegal and is seen by many as criminal. it is against the law for the courts to challenge canadian criminal code law. it is the job of the courts to enforce laws, not strike them down ...
 
lone wolf
+2
#35
Book 'em Danno....
 
CDNBear
+1
#36
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Glad to know what you think of people not as well off as yourself.

Not as well off?

I've known a few freelance girls that clear 6 figures annually.

Quote: Originally Posted by wizardView Post

... this ruling is completely illegal and is seen by many as criminal. it is against the law for the courts to challenge canadian criminal code law. it is the job of the courts to enforce laws, not strike them down ...

Wrong again wizzy.
 
SLM
#37
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

Not as well off?

I've known a few freelance girls that clear 6 figures annually.

Well off or not, cheap comments are still cheap comments.

Quote:

Wrong again wizzy.

Yes, but it's a losing battle. Or should I say lost cause.
 
CDNBear
+1
#38
Quote: Originally Posted by SLMView Post

Well off or not, cheap comments are still cheap comments.

I just ignored the stupid comment altogether.

Quote:

Yes, but it's a losing battle. Or should I say lost cause.

The latter.
 
SLM
+1
#39
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

I just ignored the stupid comment altogether.

Oh I know you did. I just had more darts to throw.
 
Cannuck
-1
#40
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

I just ignored the stupid comment altogether.

You didn't ignore it. You replied to it.
 
CDNBear
+1
#41
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

You didn't ignore it. You replied to it.

I'm replying to one now, that's for sure.

I blame your admitted stupidity.
 
Cannuck
-1
#42
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

I'm reply to one now, that's for sure.

I blame your admitted stupidity.

Why did you lie?
 
CDNBear
+1
#43
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

Why did you lie?

I didn't. That's your MO.

But, by all means, try and divert attention away from your continued stupidity.
 
Cannuck
-1
#44
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

I didn't.

Of course you did. Now you are lying about your lie. Tsk tsk...you should be a politician.
 
CDNBear
+2
#45
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

Of course you did. Now you are lying about your lie. Tsk tsk...you should be a politician.

It's OK Jimmy, I can understand how you being admittedly stupid, impedes your reasoning skills. As you clearly pointed out here.

You really should head back to your Justin Beiber forum. It's obviously more your speed.
 
Cannuck
-1
#46
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

It's OK Jimmy, I can understand how you being admittedly stupid, impedes your reasoning skills. As you clearly pointed out here.

You really should head back to your Justin Beiber forum. It's obviously more your speed.

Why are you lying? Is it really that difficult to admit your dishonest response?
 
Nuggler
#47
http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/images/news/to...p-00829154.jpg


Hoooboy, She makes a living selling herself!!??..................Demand must be outpacing supply by a whole bunch.

(No disrespect to general womenkind meant)
 
CDNBear
+1
#48
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

Why are you lying? Is it really that difficult to admit your dishonest response?

I blame your admitted stupidity for your obvious confusion.
 
Cannuck
-1
#49
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

I blame your admitted stupidity for your obvious confusion.

Tsk tsk
 
CDNBear
+3
#50
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

Tsk tsk

Yes, I know you get butt hurt when I point out your admitted deficiencies.

Post #1566222 - Re: Ontario Appeal Court strikes down ban on brothels (external - login to view) Bad Cannuck



I don't know why I find it funny, when I make you cry. But I do.
 
Goober
+2
#51
Quote: Originally Posted by wizardView Post

... this ruling is completely illegal and is seen by many as criminal. it is against the law for the courts to challenge canadian criminal code law. it is the job of the courts to enforce laws, not strike them down ...

Off your meds again.
 
SLM
+1
#52
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Off your meds again.

You have to be on meds before you can go off them Goober.

He just doesn't comprehend the role of the courts. Apparently there's some bitterness.
 
L Gilbert
+2
#53
Quote: Originally Posted by B00MerView Post

Ontario Appeal Court strikes down ban on brothels

Two sex-trade laws ruled unconstitutional



Ontario’s Court of Appeal agrees that sex workers should be permitted to work in safer locations and pay others to help protect them, but not that they should be able to communicate with their clients in public places.

Makes sense.
 
CDNBear
#54
Post #1566228 - Re: Ontario Appeal Court strikes down ban on brothels (external - login to view) Bad Cannuck



Poor little Jimmy, stuffs his foot in his mouth, gets PWND and cries. I'm not surprised, your admitted stupidity, must impede so many functions the rest of us take for granted.

Post #1566760 - Re: Ontario Appeal Court strikes down ban on brothels (external - login to view) Bad Cannuck



You're still butt hurt?

Geez, maybe you should get off the net for a while. You're taking it way to seriously. I blame your admitted stupidity.
 
WLDB
+1
#55
Quote: Originally Posted by wizardView Post

... this ruling is completely illegal and is seen by many as criminal. it is against the law for the courts to challenge canadian criminal code law. it is the job of the courts to enforce laws, not strike them down ...

You dont know much about the roles of the courts do you? They are allowed to strike down laws that are unconstitutional.
 
petros
+1
#56


It's time to get down to bidness. Bottom bitch pays good. Who's up?
 
SLM
+1
#57
Quote: Originally Posted by WLDBView Post

You dont know much about the roles of the courts do you? They are allowed to strike down laws that are unconstitutional.

No. He doesn't.
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post


It's time to get down to bidness. Bottom bitch pays good. Who's up?

Huggy Bear's got some bling!
 
Vanni Fucci
+1
#58
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

Makes sense.

Yep, and since it's happening whether it's illegal or not, why not regulate it and make it safe...

If we were to legalize prostitution AND drugs, the organized crime syndicates would be pretty much out of business...
 
WLDB
#59
Quote: Originally Posted by Vanni FucciView Post


If we were to legalize prostitution AND drugs, the organized crime syndicates would be pretty much out of business...

Then they'd go into politics to try and change it back.
 
SLM
+1
#60
Quote: Originally Posted by WLDBView Post

Then they'd go into politics to try and change it back.

Crooks? In political office? That's just crazy talk.
 

Similar Threads

118
Ont. court to rule on anti-prostitution laws
by mentalfloss | Aug 15th, 2011
no new posts