NY Times Refuses to Run Anti-Islam Ad… After Running Anti-Catholic Ad

[Locutus]

Executives at The New York Times have rejected a full-page anti-Islam advertisement that mimicked a controversial anti-Catholic advertisement they published on March 9.


According to a Mar. 13 letter sent by the Times to the ad’s sponsor, anti-Islam activist Pamela Geller, the $39,000 anti-Islam ad was rejected because “the fallout from running this ad now could put U.S. troops and/or civilians in the [Afghan] region in danger.”

Read more: New York Times | Anti-Islam ad | Anti-Catholic ad | The Daily Caller

Why so mad at Catholics NYT?

​

 

[CDNBear]

What did you expect? Catholics aren't known for wearing exploding vests, or hunting cartoonists.

 

[gerryh]

because Catholics are an easy target, just look at the Catholic bashing on CC.

 

[Locutus]

What did you expect? Catholics aren't known for wearing exploding vests, or hunting cartoonists.

They have cooler uniforms though. Colorful and such. The brothers are simply too bland for my liking.


Adrian as Camp Fashion Consultant: Because you go in the jungle, I can't see you. You know, it's like wearing stripes and plaid. For me, I want to do something different. You know, you go in the jungle, make a statement. If you're going to fight, clash. You know what I mean?