B.C. budget 2012: 'Status quo' won

Yesterday there was reminders that we need another holiday. It seems there are more pressing matters at hand, with our provincial debt close to $60 billion ($15,000 for every man woman and child) . At what point do we as individuals start taking some responsibility for this. Should we lay off asking for more and do more for ourselves. Is it our own greed that has got us to this point? How much of it is our own stupidity (getting lost in the bush because we don't tell people where we are going or taking a map or G.P.S.), participating in extreme sports (like couch surfing) or just plain gluttony and laziness. Has the time come to quit blaming "Government" for everything, while we fail to pick up a pen or the phone to let them know how we feel? Any ideas?
B.C. budget 2012: 'Status quo' won

Look at California. They have almost that much in annual Bond Debt payments. And they are still spending money down here. There is a big difference. BC has a vast wealth in resources. California has so many Environmental regulations that thousands of acres of timber are just wasting away. The water issues are now critical and they want to spend another $90 billion to construct a High Speed rail corridor that about 50% of the taxpayers will never be able to use but all with be required to pay for it. KALEEFORNIA got raped by the movie actor Faux Governor Arnold.

Considering that each and every time the Dippers got in, they doubled the provincial debt and the last time they raised taxes which resulted in companies and residents moving out; I'd say, yes, at least part of our financial woes have been due to the Dippers. But the other gov'ts we've had since WAC haven't exactly been all that great either. For the life of me I can't understand why AB can hum along happily (for the most part) without taxing people as much as BC does, manages to spend more on healthcare, sends more than any other province to Ottawa for equalistioon and stuff, etc. I think the AB gov't is simply a lot more efficient.

And the funny thing is,the Liberal government still tries to blame the NDP for British Columbia's financial mess

Considering that each and every time the Dippers got in, they doubled the provincial debt and the last time they raised taxes which resulted in companies and residents moving out; I'd say, yes, at least part of our financial woes have been due to the Dippers. But the other gov'ts we've had since WAC haven't exactly been all that great either. For the life of me I can't understand why AB can hum along happily (for the most part) without taxing people as much as BC does, manages to spend more on healthcare, sends more than any other province to Ottawa for equalistioon and stuff, etc. I think the AB gov't is simply a lot more efficient.

The fast cat ferries actually provided some serious benefit to the Province of BC.
Remember we had a considerable number of welders who were able to obtain
first quality skills with aluminum welding that has proved invaluable. The taxes
these people paid on earnings and the company contracts for additional work
after the cats has brought a lot of money and expertise to BC and the latest round
of contracts demonstrates that.
.

What a lode of old fart crap. Did the young turn this beautiful garden planet into a garbage heap? Did the young spend the future of seven generations out from under their feet? Did the young leave a mountain of dept that the young for generations to come will never see the end of? Sorry but what we are seeing is a generation with no hope and no future, expressing their frustration at generations of old farts who stole their future. We created an unsustainable economic system bent on bankrupting the planet andwe sit around and whine about the youth who see what we have done and feel powerless to do anything about the shyte hole we created.

That's debatable as I think the early days of WAC weren't too bad and he never ran any deficits.

If you have to go back 40 years to name a politician who could manage the growth during boom times then something should be slapping you upside the noggin.
In the past 40 years since Bennet how many govts ended in scandal or obliteration of their party as growth spiralled downward?

If you have to go back 40 years to name a politician who could manage the growth during boom times then something should be slapping you upside the noggin.
In the past 40 years since Bennet how many govts ended in scandal or obliteration of their party as growth spiralled downward?

I didn't think Dave Barrett (1972-1975) was too bad, but he did a couple of stupid things, took the strap out of the schools and gave hippies a dog welfare allowance. He also brought in the A.L.R. (good). Bill Bennett was all right but his term ended during a recession so he probably wasn't remembered too fondly. Vanderzalm ended up a disaster for three reasons, he mixed religion with politics, he mixed personal business with politics and he wasn't good at managing his people, but actually a good man himself and a hard worker. Harcourt was good but not mean enough. Dave Stupich may have been his undoing over Bingo Gate.