2113 others browsing the Canadian Forums! Join us!
Immature would have been more correct.
Those males who got hardons over Navi have some issues in my view. The Navi chicks don't even have any boobs to speak of, nor do you see any butt or crotch shots. The most nakedness you see from them is leg and torso, big deal.
Sailor Moon has more and better nakedness than Avatar does. The Sailor Moon characters have boobs, butts, and you see them in the show too, including crotch shots.
If you can't get aroused without seeing crotch, I think there's an issue.
Different people find different things attractive. To pretend there is something wrong with people who find grace, long legs, large eyes, defined collar bones, etc., sexy, is flawed.
I'll just bump these first two, since we're straying pretty far from the origins of what sparked this, and leave it at that.
Really?... If I track back it seems you're the one that started all this collar bone and body parts crap. If you cant handle the heat, get out of the kitchen.
Those males who got hardons over Navi have some issues in my view. The Navi chicks don't even have any boobs to speak of, nor do you see any butt or crotch shots. The most nakedness you see from them is leg and torso, big deal.
Sailor Moon has more and better nakedness than Avatar does. The Sailor Moon characters have boobs, butts, and you see them in the show too, including crotch shots.
Really?... If I track back it seems you're the one that started all this collar bone and body parts crap. If you cant handle the heat, get out of the kitchen.
I have no interest in carrying on beyond addressing what StarScream said.... that there's something wrong with men who are attracted to anything that's not showing butt, boob, or crotch. I find it pretty hard to believe, knowing the broad spectrum of men I know, and the wide variety of things they dig, beyond just butts, boobs, and crotch.
Why you take something such as that so personally as to feel the need to freak out and insult (and yes, I've seen your insults before they were deleted) is beyond me.
So you define what normal is now?.
Immature would have been more correct.
Karrie. If you truly believe in what you say is true and that you know so much about MEN then answer my questions. Otherwise stop replying with your worthless claims and what you claim is true.
Quote has been trimmed, See full post:
Prove that grace hints at sexual talent in bed. Prove to me where I've said anything about big boobs and big ass to be more appealing than other parts of the female body. Prove that collar bones are inticing, as are large wide eyes over breasts, butts, legs, stomach and smile. Prove that MEN have more devloped tastes than their younger counterparts. And prove in your post that I'm a boy.
After all the posts and arguments you put out, you've only managed to answer ONE correctly. Men are sex driven. However, your answer doesn't actually count since 'Men are sex driven' is common knowledge. You should've known that right off the bat.
According to your 'bumping post' it's YOU that sparked this debate. You could have easily just said something like 'to each their own' or 'maybe those people saw something they liked' and such. But you didn't and decided to charge my view of it, and therefore 'sparked' this whole thing. If you're gonna start something you damn well better finish it.
If you think you really know what you're talking about, and that your position is assured and true as you claim then you better start PROVING IT! Next post you bring had better have all the answers.
According to your 'bumping post' it's YOU that sparked this debate. You could have easily just said something like 'to each their own' or 'maybe those people saw something they liked' and such. But you didn't and decided to charge my view of it, and therefore 'sparked' this whole thing. If you're gonna start something you damn well better finish it.
Can you back that up with a real counterpoint or are you just content with baseless name calling?
Nope. I merely said that to say there's something wrong with them, is wrong. Starscream tried to define normal, not me. I said attraction comes in too big a variety for him to narrow it down to such a slim parameter being the norm.
Men are sex driven, why do you ask? Do they not bother to share that with you?
Being sex driven creatures, many men notice the things and people around them and develop an enjoyment of the features that hint at sex. For a lot of men (the kind who don't stare at nudity and porn all day), leg leads to crotch (to get crude about it), thus leg is enticing, the breast lies beneath the collar bone thus even the curve of a collar bone can be enticing, grace hints at thrilling ability in bed, and is a turn on. To put it in terms you understand, wide eyes indicate youth on an anthropological level, thus the 'draw' of anime characters and the stuff that turns you on, like Sailor Moon, even if you don't notice that's part of the appeal.
To say there's something wrong with men who like something just because they can find more about the female body appealing than big boobs and big ass, is flawed, and judging by the statements of all but two of the males in this thread, I think I can stand quite assured in my position.
I never said butts boobs and cooch weren't desirable, or not desired over the other things. I simply said that the absence of them shouldn't preclude arousal necessarily.
Quote has been trimmed, See full post:
as for eyes... here ya go... "Desired traits were large female eyes, small chin and nose, and these "infantlike features draw out in them the same caretaking response a baby would–they make a woman seem cute and adorable."[37] Further, high wide cheekbones and narrow cheeks are "signs that a woman has reached puberty" and "high eyebrows, dilated pupils and wide smile" signal excitement and sociability.[37] "
from
Physical attractiveness - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
grace and sexual prowess? Do I really need to explain the link in people's minds to you? I'd think MuchMusic would suffice, but, fine...
this article... Sexy people play the symmetry card - Skin and beauty- msnbc.com ... has some info into it (despite being a mere fashion article), including a reference to 'The Science of Sexy',...
Can you back that up with a real counterpoint or are you just content with baseless name calling?
I wasn't taking a shot at you.... you said men who could get hard without seeing ass boobs or crotch have an issue.
I wasn't taking a shot at you.... you said men who could get hard without seeing ass boobs or crotch have an issue. I said I would think there is more issue if those are the ONLY things that can get someone aroused. I'm done talking about it with you since you clearly don't get what I'm saying, and don't even understand what you said.
Yeah sure. This coming from someone who can't even back up their arguments or claims with actual proof. Next time you start a debate with someone you better back up your arguments with credible stuff, otherwise keep your thoughts to yourself.
This movie is everywhere being advertised on TV, and one question comes to mind....
Why didnt we orbital bomb those aliens with spaceship like AC-130's? I would have
