Genius
Posts: 783 
April 22nd, 2004, 09:18 PM
can they keep one name for more than a few years? first its cantel. then its cantel at&t, they its rogers at&t, then its rogers at&t wireless........... now its rogers wireless. what are they gonna call themselfs next? I cannot trust someone who cant stick to one thing for a period of time.
bell is always bell!
fido is always fido!
shaw is always shaw!
can they keep one name for more than a few years? first its cantel. then its cantel at&t, they its rogers at&t, then its rogers at&t wireless........... now its rogers wireless. what are they gonna call themselfs next? I cannot trust someone who cant stick to one thing for a period of time.
bell is always bell!
fido is always fido!
shaw is always shaw!
April 23rd, 2004, 10:30 AM
Be reminded: Rogers Wireless is _NOT_ a new network. They are still operating on their always-the-same GSM 1900MhZ and TDMA networks.
Quoting
Yup! They are always trying everything to get a new face to get new customers! Their advertisements state a new Rogers Wireless network. AFAIK, it's not a new network. Just a new name, dropping the AT&T part due to license issues in Canada.
It's the great corporate shell game, lola. Carnies used to call it fleecing the rubes.
Be reminded: Rogers Wireless is _NOT_ a new network. They are still operating on their always-the-same GSM 1900MhZ and TDMA networks.
Genius
Posts: 783
April 27th, 2004, 10:01 AM
Actually Rogers now has a new wireless network. It's called 850 Mhz GSM.
Lots of rave reviews...
http://www.howardforums.com/showthre...hreadid=343131
http://www.howardforums.com/showthre...hreadid=342205
http://www.howardforums.com/showthre...hreadid=354218
http://www.howardforums.com/showthre...hreadid=341424
http://www.howardforums.com/showthre...hreadid=346735
Not partial to a carrier, but there has been lots of rave reviews with Roger's new wireless network....
Thanks,
Mark Rejhon
http://www.marky.com
Actually Rogers now has a new wireless network. It's called 850 Mhz GSM.
Lots of rave reviews...
http://www.howardforums.com/showthre...hreadid=343131
http://www.howardforums.com/showthre...hreadid=342205
http://www.howardforums.com/showthre...hreadid=354218
http://www.howardforums.com/showthre...hreadid=341424
http://www.howardforums.com/showthre...hreadid=346735
Not partial to a carrier, but there has been lots of rave reviews with Roger's new wireless network....
Thanks,
Mark Rejhon
http://www.marky.com
Genius
Posts: 783
April 27th, 2004, 10:03 AM
I forgot to add -- one must have a new cellphone supporting 850 Mhz, to eliminate most of the dead spots on Roger's network. At least in Ontario, people are now saying it's finally superior to Fido (at least in most parts of Ontario, anyway). Just about damn time!
I forgot to add -- one must have a new cellphone supporting 850 Mhz, to eliminate most of the dead spots on Roger's network. At least in Ontario, people are now saying it's finally superior to Fido (at least in most parts of Ontario, anyway). Just about damn time!
Newbie
Posts: 2
December 27th, 2004, 02:43 AM
heck yea, Rogers has shown continued growth and has a growing customer base still which is evident by all the posts about them on forums such as the one were in right now and this Rogers forum.
heck yea, Rogers has shown continued growth and has a growing customer base still which is evident by all the posts about them on forums such as the one were in right now and this Rogers forum.
