Join Us.
--
--

We are a non partisan grassroots movement of hard working Nova Scotians looking to make a difference by opposing any tax increase by the current government and working towards keeping more of our hard earned dollars.
Join Us.
--
--

I suggest you join the Tea Party in USA. You will get a favorable reception there. In Canada, we just don’t go for that far right philosophy, cut taxes at any cost, and hang the deficit and the debt.
But that kind of extreme philosophy, proposing simple solutions to complex problems (cut taxes, that will fix everything) just doesn’t go down well in Canada. In Ontario, McGuinty raised taxes (by breaking an election pledge); he is as popular as ever. He used the tax increase to balance the budget and run a surplus.

Who is saying anything about cutting taxes? We are opposing a proposed 2% HST hike to cover non-essential government spending that is out of control. That's far-right ???

We are a non partisan grassroots movement of hard working Nova Scotians looking to make a difference by opposing any tax increase by the current government and working towards keeping more of our hard earned dollars.

I suggest you join the Tea Party in USA. You will get a favorable reception there. In Canada, we just don’t go for that far right philosophy, cut taxes at any cost, and hang the deficit and the debt.
When we come out of the economic hole, I personally would support tax increase if it goes straight to reducing the budget deficit. (and is not squandered away on new programs) and provided it is also accompanied with spending cuts.
But that kind of extreme philosophy, proposing simple solutions to complex problems (cut taxes, that will fix everything) just doesn’t go down well in Canada. In Ontario, McGuinty raised taxes (by breaking an election pledge); he is as popular as ever. He used the tax increase to balance the budget and run a surplus.

"When we come out of the economic hole, I personally would support tax increase if it goes straight to reducing the budget deficit. (and is not squandered away on new programs) and provided it is also accompanied with spending cuts."
Seriously, when has either of our federal goverments ever done exactly what you said?

Oh, I can think of a couple of examples, ironsides. Liberals here in Canada balanced the budget, they had to take many painful decisions, including spending cuts and tax increases. There were howls of protests, there was plenty of screaming by the Conservatives (of course), and also by special interest, advocacy groups.

And just how do you think they balanced that budget? Gee, I dunno, I guess we take the usurious paroll taxes like UI, (euphemistically re named EI) and its surplus of $50,000,000,000 and apply it to the federal deficit of $50,000,000,000, and bingo, balanced budget. Sure, they finally knuckled under to pressure to raise the thresholds for marginal tax rates put in place by the Mulroney government that lead to bracket creep, but it took them 4 years to do that, long after the budget was balanced, but still didn't decrease payroll taxes. It is a shell game, the Liberals perfected it, (if they didn't themselves invent it). They weren't hard decisions, they had a majority, they ran the country like a dictatorship, the only effective opposition was within their own ranks. Don't you get it yet? We pay over half of our income to the government, if you don't think that is wrong there is just no hope for you.

And just how do you think they balanced that budget? Gee, I dunno, I guess we take the usurious paroll taxes like UI, (euphemistically re named EI) and its surplus of $50,000,000,000 and apply it to the federal deficit of $50,000,000,000, and bingo, balanced budget.

They weren't hard decisions, they had a majority, they ran the country like a dictatorship, the only effective opposition was within their own ranks. Don't you get it yet? We pay over half of our income to the government, if you don't think that is wrong there is just no hope for you.

It's an organization of major businesses, and boards of trade, and the AIMS.

Don't you get it yet? We pay over half of our income to the government, if you don't think that is wrong there is just no hope for you.

Bob- I think whether it is wrong or not depends on the financial situation of the guy deciding. I guess a person with an income of over $100, 000 can stand a little more tax. The rest of us are already taxed to the gills. If we have to cut back on our spending then I think the gov't should set an example. I'm not about to do it now but quite recently I checked M.P.'s travel allowance, actually in access of most Canadian's salary, it's obscene and I personally think it could be reduced by 60% before any taxes are increased one penny.

That's nonsense. We are a group of unaffiliated citizens. What leads you to say such a thing?
Which businesses?
Which boards of trade?
Who from AIMS is involved?
What other groups not mentioned?

As to that, that is a myth propagated by conservatives, that we pay high taxes here in Canada. We may pay slightly higher taxes than in USA (even here, the difference is not huge, contrary to popular belief. And the comparison there is skewed, seeing that they pay separate social security tax, medical insurance etc.). However, our taxes are quite comparable with Europe, Australia, New Zealand etc, and indeed compare quite favorably with that in many developed countries.
--

I just took a glance at the attachment- it's either Bullsh*t or it incomplete. For individuals it shows 15-29%. Yeah, right. You and I both know that once our income is over about $50,000 we are into the 41% Fed. tax category + substantial Prov. tax and that just covers income. On top of that we have property taxes, P.S.t. H.S.T., tobacco taxes, alcohol taxes, real estate sales taxes, gasoline taxes..............Need I go on?

So, are you trying to pretend that the 'Atlantica Party' has nothing to do with the Atlantica concept that was being discussed at all the meetings last year and the year before?
That's a stretch.

Certainly tax deferred, TenPenny. But taxes will be differed for many years to come. When time comes to collapse the RRSP, it can always be rolled over into a RRIF. And when it comes to withdrawing money from the RRIF, why there are also ways to minimize the tax paid there.

I see, since the numbers don’t agree with your preconceived notions, they are bull****. Talk about a closed mind.
As to your claim of 41% federal taxes, I looked at 2008 tax return of me and my wife, we are both high earners.
The ratio of taxes payable to total income (line 150 in the tax form) was 17%. If one looks at the net income (after RRSP and all the other deductions, line 236), the ratio was 27.8%, a far cry from your 41%. And this includes the federal tax, provincial tax and CPP contributions for both the employee and the employer. And we are high earners, I assume somebody earning 50 or 60,000, the ratio would be a lot less.
As I said, high taxes are a myth propagated by the conservatives. We are no different than Europe or Australia/New Zealand. In fact we compare quite favorably with many of them.

I does not matter who you pay your taxes to, it all comes out of your pocket. (20% Fed 21% Provincial) or any combination it actually is. There is no reason for Provincial taxes to be so high, most of what they pay for should come from the federal gov..