Two years later, details of the initial incident which started the 2006 Israel lebanon war are now more or less known.
Lebanon/Israel 2006
This initial incident which started the 2006 Israel/Lebanon war was legal. Technically Israel and Lebanon have been at war since Israel declared independance. The border is not agreed upon and each side can legally attack the other side's military targets. Civilian are not to be deliberately targetted.
No civilians were seriously hurt as far as I can tell by Hezbollah's initial diversionary attack. The subsequent Hezbollah raid and the Israeli counter attack were both legal acts of war. But Israel's later attacks against Lebanese civilian targets were war crimes. So were Hezbollahs rocket attacks on Israeli civilian targets in response.
Israel and Lebanon have mutually agreed upon rules of miltary conduct:
Read the text. Both sides can engage military targets as long as it doesn't involve civilians. Hezbollah's diversionary attack probably did not violate the above agreement. Issrael would have to priove that Hezbollah deliberately attacked civilians. If that's true it wasn't very effective. No one was killed. BUt Israel claims civilians were hurt, although I can find no information about their injuries. But the raid which resulted in Israeli military casualties and prisoners was completely within the terms of the April Understanding.
This was a minor border skirmish which Israel escalated.
Updates:
Israel still hasn't pulled out of Southern Lebanon as per UNSC Resolution 1701:
Lebanon/Israel 2006
Zar'it-Shtula incident
The Zar'it-Shtula incident was a cross-border attack committed by Lebanon-based Hezbollah special forces on an Israeli military patrol on 12 July 2006 on Israeli territory. The operation was originally named "Freedom for Samir Al-Quntar and his brothers" by Hezbollah, but it was shortened to "Operation Truthful Promise".[1] Using rockets fired on several Israeli towns as a diversion, Hezbollah militants crossed from Lebanon into Israel [2] and ambushed two Israeli Army vehicles, killing three Israeli soldiers and capturing two. Hezbollah demanded the release of Lebanese prisoners held by Israel in exchange for the release of the abducted soldiers. Israel refused and launched a large-scale military campaign across Lebanon in response to the Hezbollah incursion. This marked the start of the 2006 Lebanon War.
In the months leading up to the attack, Lt. Col. Ishai Efroni reported seeing increased activity across the fenceline, including more brazen Hezbollah patrols. He had repeatedly seen burden-laden donkeys, which he had believed were being led by innocent farmers, but after the incident suspected were laden with arms and equipment. After a rocket attack on May 28, the colonel, who at 41 had spent much of his career along the northern border, "got the feeling something had changed."[3]
Hezbollah had carved a hollow from the underbrush, just above the Israeli border patrol track. The "camp was stocked with food, water, radios, rifles, antitank missiles and diagrams detailing the insignia and size of Israeli military units."[3]
At around 9:00 a.m. local time (06:00 UTC), on 12 July 2006, Hezbollah initiated a diversionary Katyusha rocket and mortar attack on Israeli military positions and border villages, including Zar'it and Shlomi.[4][5][6][7][8][9]
A ground contingent of Hezbollah fighters crossed the border into Israeli territory and attacked two Israeli armoured Humvees patrolling on the Israeli side of the Israel-Lebanon border between the villages of Zar'it and Shtula (Shetula). The attackers took advantage of a "dead zone" in the border fence not visible from any of the IDF lookout posts and may have used a wheeled ladder to climb the fence.[4] After hiding in a wadi on the Israeli side of the fence they attacked with a combination of pre-positioned explosives and anti-tank missiles. The team knocked out the trailing Humvee, killing three soldiers inside, and captured two soldiers from the first vehicle.[3] "Another soldier was seriously wounded, another lightly wounded and a third suffered a shrapnel scratch." The entire incident took no more than 10 minutes.[4]
A total of seven army posts "reported taking fire at the same time, coordinated attacks that knocked out surveillance cameras." The attack had knocked out command communications with the convoy. Twenty minutes passed until Staff Sgts. Ehud Goldwasser, 31, and Eldad Regev, 26, were confirmed to be missing from the first vehicle, while the gunmen "fled through olive orchards to the Lebanese border village of Aita al-Shaab."[3]
Lt. Col. Ishai Efroni, deputy commander of the Baram Brigade, sent a Merkava Mark II tank, an armored personnel carrier and a helicopter in pursuit.[3] Crossing into Lebanon,[10] they headed down a dirt track lined with Lebanese border defenses.[3] When it "unexpectedly veered onto the road near a known Hezbollah post" the resulting blast was "enormous, killing the four soldiers inside instantly."[3][11] A fifth soldier died during an ensuing firefight while attempting to recover their bodies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zar'it-Shtula_incident
This initial incident which started the 2006 Israel/Lebanon war was legal. Technically Israel and Lebanon have been at war since Israel declared independance. The border is not agreed upon and each side can legally attack the other side's military targets. Civilian are not to be deliberately targetted.
No civilians were seriously hurt as far as I can tell by Hezbollah's initial diversionary attack. The subsequent Hezbollah raid and the Israeli counter attack were both legal acts of war. But Israel's later attacks against Lebanese civilian targets were war crimes. So were Hezbollahs rocket attacks on Israeli civilian targets in response.
Israel and Lebanon have mutually agreed upon rules of miltary conduct:
The Israeli-Lebanese Ceasefire Understanding (also known as The Grapes of Wrath Understandings and the April Understanding) was an informal written agreement between Israel and Hezbollah, reached through the diplomatic efforts of the US, which ended the 1996 military conflict between the two sides. The agreement was announced at 18:00 on April 26, 1996.
Under the terms of the agreement, both sides agreed to end cross-border attacks on civilian targets, as well refrain from using civilian villages to launch attacks. The Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the Grapes of Wrath Understandings was set up, composed of representatives from the US, France, Syria, Israel and Lebanon. The committee convenes to monitor and discuss infringements of the understandings by the two sides.
The full text of the agreement and adjoining letter from US secretary of state Warren Christopher is as follows:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli-Lebanese_Ceasefire_Understanding
Read the text. Both sides can engage military targets as long as it doesn't involve civilians. Hezbollah's diversionary attack probably did not violate the above agreement. Issrael would have to priove that Hezbollah deliberately attacked civilians. If that's true it wasn't very effective. No one was killed. BUt Israel claims civilians were hurt, although I can find no information about their injuries. But the raid which resulted in Israeli military casualties and prisoners was completely within the terms of the April Understanding.
This was a minor border skirmish which Israel escalated.
Updates:
04/03/2008
UN Chief: Israel says Hezbollah has 30,000 rockets in S. Lebanon
By The Associated Press
Israel says Hezbollah is rearming and has an arsenal including 10,000 long-range rockets and 20,000 short-range rockets in southern Lebanon, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the Security Council in a new report Tuesday.
While Ban's report did not confirm Israel's claim, the UN chief reiterated his concern about Hezbollah's public statements and persistent reports pointing to breaches of a UN arms embargo, which bans weapons transfers to the militant Shiite Islamic militia.
Ban also expressed concern at the threats of open war against Israel by Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. Nasrallah accused Israel of trying to start a new war by assassinating a top Hezbollah commander and warned it would be a battle Israel would lose.
Israel has denied involvement in the February 12 car bombing in Damascus, Syria that killed Imad Mughniyeh...
http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/page... rockets in S. Lebanon'&dyn_server=172.20.5.5
UN official discusses latest situation in southern Lebanon with officials in Beirut
28 February 2007 – A senior United Nations official today discussed with Lebanese officials full implementation of the Security Council resolution that ended last summer’s war between Israel and Hizbollah, following similar talks earlier this week with Israeli authorities.
“We discussed many issues from the question of prisoners, Israeli prisoners in Lebanon, Lebanese prisoners in Israel – we would like to see more progress on that,” Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s Special Advisor on the situation in the Middle East Michael Williams told reporters after meeting with officials in Beirut, the Lebanese capital, in preparation for Mr. Ban’s next report to the Council on the situation.
“We also discussed the issue of Israeli overflights which are a violation of Lebanese sovereignty and occur on a regular and indeed a daily basis. We discussed the issue of munitions in the south, both landmines and the far more difficult issue of cluster bombs.”
Mr. Williams noted that there had been some progress on landmines with Israel providing military maps that have helped with their destruction, but the issue of the far more deadly cluster bombs used by Israel last summer has been far more difficult. UN officials have frequently cited the dangers to civilians in their villages and fields from unexploded cluster bombs.
Last month, a UN Environment Programme (UNEP) report stressed the importance of rapidly removing them, especially in southern Lebanon where large areas of economically important agricultural land have become “out of bounds” for farmers, noting that de-mining could take up to 15 months.
Council resolution 1701 adopted in August mandated the complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon together with Lebanese army deployment in the area...
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2007/02/mil-070228-unnews01.htm
Israel still hasn't pulled out of Southern Lebanon as per UNSC Resolution 1701:
The United Nations has proposed that UNIFIL troops take over security in the northern half of the border village of Ghajar, so that IDF forces can withdraw behind the Israel side of the international border. Israel has rejected this proposal and says any future consideration of the matter requires that the Lebanese government agree to it in writing.
The new plan was presented to Israel during a number of meetings between UNIFIL officials and senior Israeli figures, including Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi, who met last month with the commander of the UN forces in southern Lebanon, Major General Claudio Graziano.
According to the UN plan, UNIFIL will assume control and full responsibility over security in the northern part of the village. It will also provide all necessary services to the residents there.
During his meeting with Ashkenazi, Graziano noted that details of the proposal have also been given to the Lebanese government and its armed forces.
In its official response, Israel noted that the issue is not relevant at this stage, especially because Lebanon rejected a similar deal a year ago. In March 2007, Israel's security-political cabinet authorized an agreement under which the Israel Defense Forces would withdraw from the northern section of Ghajar; its positions would be taken over by UNIFIL and the Lebanese Army, which would provide security.
According to Israel's proposal, Israel would continue to provide services to the village's civilian population.
The Lebanese government rescinded the agreement and did not implement it, in part because of the political crisis in the country.
Senior officials in Israel have since required as a precondition that any future discussion on the matter be accompanied by a signed, official agreement by the Lebanese government.
Israeli officials are frustrated by the failures in implementing Security Council Resolution 1701 that ended the Second Lebanon War; they are specifically unhappy about the conduct of Hezbollah. Senior political sources in Jerusalem noted that "there is no intention to discuss the Ghajar issue as long as issues that trouble Israel are not being dealt with." ...
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/969663.html