Super Genius
Posts: 1,323 
April 22nd, 2007, 08:15 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII would just love that she would come, would be so much fun to throw her some rocks.....
Quote:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...rce_login=true
QUEBEC — A suggestion the Queen should be invited to Quebec City's 400th anniversary birthday bash next year has created an uproar in the province. Open-line radio and television shows were swamped yesterday with calls opposing the idea, the majority of people saying it would be an insult to Quebeckers and put the “Quebec nation to shame.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII would just love that she would come, would be so much fun to throw her some rocks.....
The Padre
Posts: 4,558 
Location: Ontario
Location: Ontario
April 22nd, 2007, 08:29 AM
I find myself mildly offended at your slandering of Her Majesty's name in your title. You may not agree with the Canadian monarchy, and that is certainly up to you, but she is still our Head of State and deserves at least the minimum of respect for that alone.
Quoting Logic 7
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...rce_login=true
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII would just love that she would come, would be so much fun to throw her some rocks.....
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII would just love that she would come, would be so much fun to throw her some rocks.....
I find myself mildly offended at your slandering of Her Majesty's name in your title. You may not agree with the Canadian monarchy, and that is certainly up to you, but she is still our Head of State and deserves at least the minimum of respect for that alone.
Super Genius
Posts: 1,323
April 22nd, 2007, 08:30 AM
If you find yourself offended, that is your problem, however she deserves no respect at all, period.
Quoting sanctus
I find myself mildly offended at your slandering of Her Majesty's name in your title. You may not agree with the Canadian monarchy, and that is certainly up to you, but she is still our Head of State and deserves at least the minimum of respect for that alone.
If you find yourself offended, that is your problem, however she deserves no respect at all, period.
The Padre
Posts: 4,558
Location: Ontario
Location: Ontario
April 22nd, 2007, 08:45 AM
An easy statement. Why does she not deserve the respect due to her office? I don't care about her personally, but as the Head of State why does she not deserve even the modicum of respect due any Head of State? You display your ignorance with such statements, and you do not present a valid reason for them. Should we keep the monarchy in this country? That is a separate and different discussion. But at present, we do have the monarch, and it is our obligation to respect those symbols of our government that unites us as a people.
Quoting Logic 7
If you find yourself offended, that is your problem, however she deserves no respect at all, period.
An easy statement. Why does she not deserve the respect due to her office? I don't care about her personally, but as the Head of State why does she not deserve even the modicum of respect due any Head of State? You display your ignorance with such statements, and you do not present a valid reason for them. Should we keep the monarchy in this country? That is a separate and different discussion. But at present, we do have the monarch, and it is our obligation to respect those symbols of our government that unites us as a people.
Electoral Member
Posts: 842
Location: Lala Land
Location: Lala Land
April 22nd, 2007, 08:52 AM
I'm furthest from being a fan of the Queen. I hate her on our money and I hate that it costs us a fortune whenever she decides to come here. BUT, she is on our money and she sometimes wants to come here. It's her right, regardless of our "independence" from Britian, we still have a responsibility to them. We certainly shouldn't be calling her a bitch, we should be grateful that one of your daily dollars doesn't go to her. (one dollar from every Great Britian citizen goes to her each day)
Besides it's not like that ghastly, horsefaced, Diana killer is coming. Yeck.
Be grateful, I'd rather have the Queen as our head of state than that useless George Bush piece of crap.
I'm furthest from being a fan of the Queen. I hate her on our money and I hate that it costs us a fortune whenever she decides to come here. BUT, she is on our money and she sometimes wants to come here. It's her right, regardless of our "independence" from Britian, we still have a responsibility to them. We certainly shouldn't be calling her a bitch, we should be grateful that one of your daily dollars doesn't go to her. (one dollar from every Great Britian citizen goes to her each day)
Besides it's not like that ghastly, horsefaced, Diana killer is coming. Yeck.
Be grateful, I'd rather have the Queen as our head of state than that useless George Bush piece of crap.
Senate Member
Posts: 5,155
Location: Saint John, N.B.
Location: Saint John, N.B.
April 22nd, 2007, 09:39 AM
Quoting Logic 7
Yeah, throwing rocks at little old ladies would be about what I would expect from you, both ethically, and intellectually.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...rce_login=true
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII would just love that she would come, would be so much fun to throw her some rocks.....
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII would just love that she would come, would be so much fun to throw her some rocks.....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posts: 6,516
Videos: 5
Location: Newfoundland!
Videos: 5
Location: Newfoundland!
April 22nd, 2007, 09:41 AM
Quoting Logic 7
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII would just love that she would come, would be so much fun to throw her some rocks.....
Quoting tamarin
You two really love the violent option don't you? you should hook up and beat the crap out of people together. you could make the world a better place
You are a sick little twit. You deserve to be padlocked to a post and birched. And given the treatment again in an hour.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posts: 6,516
Videos: 5
Location: Newfoundland!
Videos: 5
Location: Newfoundland!
April 22nd, 2007, 10:00 AM
you're right tamarin, talk IS cheap. But where does it say we should sort our problems out in an expensive way? Punching someone in the head way well express your discontent, but it doesn't explain your reasons or suggest an alternate course of action which might be more acceptable.
In other words, violence is NOT constructive, communication is.
you're right tamarin, talk IS cheap. But where does it say we should sort our problems out in an expensive way? Punching someone in the head way well express your discontent, but it doesn't explain your reasons or suggest an alternate course of action which might be more acceptable.
In other words, violence is NOT constructive, communication is.
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 10,495
Location: The Evil Empire
Location: The Evil Empire
April 22nd, 2007, 10:04 AM
Quoting tamarin
Because they don't know how to use a telephone in the East?
If communication is so effective then why is the West in such a mess?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posts: 6,516
Videos: 5
Location: Newfoundland!
Videos: 5
Location: Newfoundland!
April 22nd, 2007, 10:21 AM
It's not terribly effective, mostly because people aren't encouraged to communicate, but rather taught that they can try for a while but when they get annoyed they should punch each other.
I'm not holding communication up as a cure-all, but I do think it's rather more effective than punching
It's not terribly effective, mostly because people aren't encouraged to communicate, but rather taught that they can try for a while but when they get annoyed they should punch each other.
I'm not holding communication up as a cure-all, but I do think it's rather more effective than punching
