Queen Elizabeth II or Bush- more powerful head of state?

Queen Elizabeth II or Bush- more powerful head of state?

  • Bush has more influence on world issues

    Votes: 4 57.1%
  • The Queen has more influence on world issues

    Votes: 3 42.9%

  • Total voters
    7

CDN87

Nominee Member
Dec 24, 2006
75
1
8
The Quen and the U.S. President are the two most powerful and influential heads of state in the world. Now the question is, which one has more power and influence on World issues and politics? I say the Queen because she has the power to fire comonwealth PM's like Stephen Harper or Tony Blair.
 

s243a

Council Member
Mar 9, 2007
1,352
15
38
Calgary
I voted for the queen but on second thoughts if Bush wants the world to do something he just has to tell them to do the opposite.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
The Quen and the U.S. President are the two most powerful and influential heads of state in the world. Now the question is, which one has more power and influence on World issues and politics? I say the Queen because she has the power to fire comonwealth PM's like Stephen Harper or Tony Blair.
She could also grow mushrooms on the moon.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Well, the Queen and the Joos do control the world's media and financial system.
Didn't she Knight Conrad Black? Maybe he got a medal. I dunno, it was something horribly stupid.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
No contest, and nothing to discuss. The U.S. President has infinitely many times the power of the British monarch. QE2 has no real power at all, and she certainly has no power to hire or fire Commonwealth Prime Ministers, that's a grotesque misapprehension of how it really works.
 

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
45
Newfoundland!
technically the queen has a lot of power, but in reality a lot of the things she "can" do would result in massive uproar. The firing of commonwealth PMs for instance... It'd probably cause a war if she tried it now.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
"Technically," yes indeed, though strictly speaking the power's vested in the Crown, not the person wearing it. The Governors-General who act in the name of the Crown in the Commonwealth have the same powers, technically, but in practical terms it doesn't amount to much except under very unusual circumstances, in which the Crown's role is to provide continuity and stability. It's happened only once in Canada's history, what's called the "King-Byng Affair," in which PM Mackenzie King asked the G-G, Lord Byng, to dissolve Parliament, Byng correctly (in the judgement of most experts these days) refused and called on the Leader of the Opposition, Arthur Meighen, to try to form a government instead.

Interestingly, we're now in a situation in which such a thing could possibly happen again, with a minority Conservative government and some natural allies arrayed against it that might be able to form a government, though it'd probably be short-lived, as Meighen's was.