Squandering billions in Iraq while U.S. suffers

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
54
Oshawa
By ERIC MARGOLIS
“A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you’re talking about real money,” famously quipped U.S. Senator Everett Dirksen back in the 1960s.
Our minds boggled last week at U.S. government estimates that President George W. Bush’s so-called “war on terror” (including Afghanistan and Iraq) will cost at least $690 billion US by next year. That’s more than the total cost of World War I, Korea, or Vietnam, and second only to World War II’s $2 trillion.
This means that by 2008, Bush’s wars in the Muslim world will have cost each American man, woman and child $2,300.
Defeat looms in Iraq; Afghanistan is headed that way. And now U.S. intelligence reports al-Qaida is stronger than ever. Osama Bin Laden, who said the only way to expel U.S. influence from the Muslim world was to bleed the U.S. financially, must be beaming.
As kings have found since the dawn of time, in war, money counts as much as armies. Wars always cost far more than originally projected.
A primary architect of the 2003 Iraq War, former deputy secretary of defence, Paul Wolfowitz, assured Americans it would only cost $40 billion. The cost of occupying Iraq would be paid, he claimed, by plundering its oil. Wolfowitz now heads the World Bank.
Speaking of epic idiocy, enter the man selected by Wolfowitz to become proconsul of U.S.-occupied Iraq, a bumbling conservative Republican hack named Paul Bremer.
During the 14 months he ran Iraq, Bremer committed two enormous follies. He dissolved Iraq’s army and police, then fired all government employees who were members of Saddam’s Ba’athist Party. Iraq was left without security forces or functioning government. Chaos ensued.
For a few hundred million, the U.S. could have hired much of Saddam’s army, security forces and bureaucrats. Instead, the Cheney/Bush administration declared them outlaws and began using Shia militias and death squads to fight the Sunni resistance, triggering today’s ghastly Sunni-Shia civil war.
Chaos in U.S.-occupied Iraq, and the collapse of its banking system and Ba’ath Party-run social programs, forced Washington to rush 363 tons of $100 US bills to Baghdad. This money, which belonged to Iraq, came from the UN-run “Oil for Food” program.
Bremer’s people dished out $12 billion US by the truckload. Another $800 million US was stolen by U.S.-appointed officials of Iraq’s defense ministry.
But $12.8 missing billions is just the tip of the iceberg.
U.S corporations in bed with the Republican Party’s right wing, like Halliburton, and mercenary-supplier, Blackwater, made billions out of Iraq. Halliburton, whose former CEO was v-p Cheney, was awarded $16 billion US in sweetheart Iraq contracts.
This week, House Democrats opened hearings that finally began to expose the tsunami of corruption that accompanied the occupation and plundering of Iraq. Billions more of fraud and thievery concealed by the White House will likely be uncovered.
‘Private contractors’
The whole sordid story of the 100,000 “private contractors” employed by the U.S. in Iraq has only begun to emerge. According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, at least 48,000 of these — let’s use the correct term, mercenaries — are private gunmen working for hundreds of U.S. military corporations like Blackwater and Vinnell. These heavily-armed desperados are a law unto themselves and are under no supervision. Some mercenaries make $1,000 US daily in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Blackwater reputedly has the world’s biggest private military base with a reported 20,000 personnel and a fleet of aircraft. Such huge numbers of mercenaries are a potential menace.
They could also pose a serious internal danger to America, given the close links of some to extreme rightists in the U.S.
The White House wants to help pay for its foreign wars by slashing spending on health and seniors. While the Washington, D.C., police no longer dare patrol crime-infested southern parts of America’s capitol, “President” Cheney and “v-p” Bush are sending the 82nd Airborne Division to try to pacify Baghdad. If this isn’t the extreme theatre of the absurd, I don’t know what is.

http://http://www.torontosun.com/News/Columnists/Margolis_Eric/2007/02/11/3586742.html

Cons over at CKA hated this guy but he is in fact a con himself. The only way they could attack him was to call him a poo head because they had no other answers.:evil3: :toothy8:
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
That was a thoughtful post Margolis wrote.... I think most wars are costly and a terrible waste of lives...which to me is far more important than measuring them in dollars....but who am I to stand up against Margolis' reasoning?

I do argue that $2300 was too much to pay for individual charitable donations however.... I personally triple that each year in spite of what is spent on war in aother nation.... and my giving stays in my
community.

If people totalled up their fast food expenses for one year $2300 is a drop in the bucket ( for those inclined to push up the cholesterol numbers lol).

Just curious as to where Margolis got his information....much of it seemed to be of the "security" kind of knowledge. He must be an important guy to Washington people to be let in on the big secrets.
 

mabudon

Metal King
Mar 15, 2006
1,339
30
48
Golden Horseshoe, Ontario
I don't know where he gets his info, but if you have read stuff by him enough, he's usually bang-on
2300$ a person might not sound like much, but if you consider the value people are getting for their money, it's pretty awful
 

karra

Ranter
Jan 3, 2006
158
3
18
here, there, and everywher
“A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you’re talking about real money,”
hmmm - and all this time I credited that quote to the Fiberal Party of Canada and the Knee Dippers - how ironic I say - does this mean we are now subjected to a rendition of Margolis each and every time his anti-American hate is posted - not that the willing cannot locate it for themselves here, eh wot http://www.torontosun.com/