Which version is FoxNews, al Jazeera or Xinhuanet?

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
which is which?

Monday August 21, 2006

1)
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Monday that Iran would continue its nuclear energy work, the state television reported.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran has decided to continue its path powerfully regarding the nuclear energy issue," Khamenei was quoted by the state television as saying.

"Bullying powers and the United States have imposed huge pressure on Iran while they know that Iran is not developing nuclear weapons," he added.

The United States has accused Iran of secretly developing nuclear weapons under a civilian front, a charge categorically denied by Tehran which says that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

The UN Security Council on July 31 adopted a resolution, urging Tehran to "suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities including research and development" by Aug. 31 or face possible sanctions.

Iran has rejected the resolution, slamming it of lacking legal basis.

2)
Iran's supreme leader has said, ahead of a United Nations security council deadline demanding a halt to uranium enrichment, that Iran will press ahead with its nuclear programme.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the final say on major policy issues, said Iran would pursue its nuclear plans.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran has made its decision and, in the issue of nuclear energy, will continue its path powerfully ... and it will receive the sweet fruits of its efforts," state television quoted him as saying.

Khamenei did not mention uranium enrichment by name but senior Iranian officials, including the deputy head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, have said in recent days that it will not be stopped.

"Considering the technical advancement of Iranian scientists, the suspension of uranium enrichment is not possible any more," Mohammad Saeedi told Iran's Fars news agency.

Saeedi said Iran would formally reply on Tuesday to a package of incentives offered in return for an end to enrichment.

Incentives package

The United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany presented the package in June, offering Iran economic and other incentives if it first halted uranium enrichment, a process that could have both military and civilian uses.

Washington has called on the United Nations to move swiftly to impose sanctions against Iran if it refuses to stop nuclear enrichment activities by the August 31 deadline set by the security council.

George Bush, the US president, said: "There must be consequences if people thumb their nose at the United Nations security council. We will work with people on the security council to achieve that objective."

US conspiracy

Khamenei dismissed the US position as a conspiracy against the Islamic world. "Arrogant powers, led by the United States, are fearful of progress of Islamic countries in various dimensions," he said.

Iran has suggested it will not give a simple "Yes" or "No" to the package but said the reply would be "multi-dimensional".

A nuclear official said Iran would submit a "comprehensive written response" to the offer.

The world's fourth largest oil exporter has insisted it has the right to enrich uranium under the Non-Proliferation Treaty and said it will use the technology to produce electricity.

3)
Iran has turned away International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors from an underground site meant to shelter its uranium enrichment program from attack, diplomats and U.N. officials told The Associated Press Monday.

Adding to tensions, Iran's supreme leader deflated hopes his country would announce a readiness to freeze enrichment when it formally responds to U.N. Security Council demands it do so. On Monday, the eve of the self-imposed Iranian deadline on accepting or refusing such a moratorium, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that Tehran will continue to pursue the contentious nuclear technology.

Iran's unprecedented refusal to allow access to the facility at Natanz could seriously hamper international attempts to ensure Tehran is not trying to produce nuclear weapons as well as violate a key part of the Nonproliferation Treaty, the diplomats and officials told the AP. They spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information.

Outlining other signs of Iranian defiance, they said that Iran denied entry visas to two IAEA inspectors in the last few weeks after doing so earlier this summer to Chris Charlier, the expert heading the agency's team to Tehran. Additionally, they said, other inspectors were only given single entry visas during their visits to the country last week, instead of the customary multiple-entry ones.

All three are selective truth versions of the same story.

FoxNews, al Jazeera or Xinhuanet?
 

gc

Electoral Member
May 9, 2006
931
20
18
RE: Which version is FoxN

#1 Xinhuanet

#2 al jazeera

#3 Fox

Am I right?
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Yes you are right. The editorial slants are pretty obvious.

1) Xinhuanet (Chinese) mentions the security and legal issues without mentioning research.

2) al Jazeera mentions research and Iran's right's (legal) without mentioning security issues.

3) Fox hints at a possible NPT violation (without context), emphasises security issues and Iran's defiance, doesn't mention Iran's legal rights or peaceful research issues.

If you just listened to just Fox News (or most Americans news), you would think Iran's enrichment activities are purely military and that the world is united against Iran.

If you just listened to al Jazeera, you might not know that Iran's nuclear research has a potential dual purpose.

Of the three sources, Xinhuanet is the least manipulative, but it also has share of inaccuracies and omissions.

I've onserved that when it comes to the middle east most American news sources (especially cable news) are far more manipulative than al Jazeera which is also pretty bad.

Most Canadians get their news from Western sources (CBC, CTV, Reuters, AP....). These sources also tend to be biased in favor of the western/American viewpoint.

The conclusion I've come to is you can't trust any news source to give a fair or objective account. Each source has their own agenda. The only way to get the whole story is to get the news from diverse sources.

This is a good place to start


http://news.google.ca