Wonder why this isn't newsworthy?
Hezbollah was also rebuked:
You would think this vote would be at least as newsworthy as the UNSC vote which brought about a temporary ceasefire everyone knows won't last.
[JURIST] The UN Human Rights Council [official website] in an emergency special session [materials; JURIST report] in Geneva Friday adopted by majority vote a resolution [draft, PDF text] condemning Israel for violating international human rights laws in the ongoing Middle East conflict [JURIST news archive] involving Lebanon. Twenty-seven of the 47 states with Council seats supported a slightly-amended final version of the measure, with 11 voting against, including 7 EU countries, Canada, Japan, Romania and Ukraine. Eight nations abstained, including Switzerland, although it had been critical of Israel [JURIST report] in the past. The resolution also called for the immediate end to the offensive in southern Lebanon, and for a commission to investigate alleged human rights abuses there. A last-minute amendment broadened a call on Israel to respect humanitarian law to include "all interested parties", but that was not enough to prevent the negative votes.
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour [official profile] read a statement [text] at the session setting out its legal context:
click here to read text:
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/08/un-rights-council-rebukes-israel-for.php
Hezbollah was also rebuked:
Hezbollah is also guilty of violating human rights standards, citing Hezbollah's use of human shields and missile attacks on densely-populated areas in northern Israel.
You would think this vote would be at least as newsworthy as the UNSC vote which brought about a temporary ceasefire everyone knows won't last.