American corruption

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
CHICAGO - Former Gov. George Ryan, who drew international praise when he commuted the sentences of everyone on Illinois' death row, was convicted of racketeering and fraud Monday in a corruption scandal that ended his political career in 2003.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ryan, 72, sat stone-faced as the verdict was read and afterward vowed to appeal.

"I believe this decision today is not in accordance with the kind of public service that I provided to the people of Illinois over 40 years, and needless to say I am disappointed in the outcome," the former governor said.

Ryan faces up to 20 years in prison for racketeering conspiracy charge alone, the most serious against him in the 22-count indictment. The jury found him guilty of all counts, including fraud, obstructing the Internal Revenue Service and lying to the FBI.

Co-defendant Larry Warner, a Chicago businessman and Ryan friend, was found guilty of racketeering conspiracy, mail fraud, attempted extortion, illegally structuring bank withdrawals and money laundering.

Neither man took the stand during their six-month trial.

Prosecutors accused Ryan of steering big-money state contracts and leases, including a $25 million IBM computer deal, to his friends and political insiders while he was secretary of state in the 1990s and then as governor starting in 1999.

In return for that help, Ryan was rewarded with annual winter vacations in Jamaica, stays in Cancun and Palm Springs and gifts ranging from a golf bag to $145,000 in loans to his brother's business, prosecutors said.

Warner, 67, raked in $3 million from Ryan-era deals, according to the office of U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald — who during the trial was also leading the federal investigation into the leak of CIA officer Valerie Plame's identity.

The case against Ryan and Warner was the state's biggest political corruption trial in decades, and it had it share of troubles.

In late March, months of testimony nearly went down the drain when the judge discovered two jurors had failed to mention past arrests on their court questionnaires. Rather than declare a mistrial, U.S. District Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer decided to replace the two jurors with alternates and, over the objection of Ryan's attorneys, ordered the jury to start deliberations over.

The new jury had deliberated for 10 days when it announced its verdict Monday.

Afterward, Ryan attorney Dan K. Webb, a former federal prosecutor, zeroed in on the judge's decision to replace the jurors.

"We're going to begin working immediately on post-trial motions to try to get this verdict overturned," Webb said.

During the trial, Webb had pounded on a theme that no one ever testified to seeing Ryan take a payoff. His powerful law firm, Winston & Strawn, represented Ryan for free — at an estimated cost of $10 million.

Ryan's sentencing was set for Aug. 4.

The corruption scandal that led to Ryan's downfall began over a decade ago with a much smaller focus: a federal investigation into a fiery van crash in Wisconsin that killed six children.

The deadly 1994 crash exposed a scheme inside the Illinois secretary of state's office in which unqualified truck drivers obtained licenses for bribes. Ryan was secretary of state at the time, and prosecutors would later argue that thousands of dollars in payoff money from the licenses went into a Ryan campaign fund.

The probe expanded over the next eight years into a wide-ranging corruption investigation that eventually reached Ryan in the governor's office.

Seventy-nine former state officials, lobbyists, truck drivers and others have been since charged. Before Ryan's trial, 74 had been convicted, including Ryan's longtime top aide, Scott Fawell.

Fawell was a star witness against Ryan and the author of a 1994 memo that prosecutor Patrick Collins called "the Magna Carta" of the racketeering scheme.

The memo urged Ryan, then-secretary of state, to replace inspector general Dean Bauer with someone who "won't ask about FR tickets" — political fundraising tickets. Bauer himself pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice and acknowledged the government could prove he had spent seven years covering up scandals to spare Ryan personal and political embarrassment.

Even as he faced federal charges back home, Ryan accepted speaking invitations across the country and was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his criticism of the death penalty.

In 2000, the Republican governor declared a moratorium on executions in Illinois after 13 death row inmates were found to have been wrongly convicted. Then, days before he left office in 2003, he cleared death row, commuting the sentences of all 167 inmates to life in prison. He declared that the state's criminal justice system was "haunted by the demon of error."

The auto accident that set the case in motion killed six children of the Rev. Scott and Janet Willis. A trucking company official later said he believed the truck driver's license was one of several bought from a state official.

The Willises, who received a $100 million settlement, attended parts of Ryan's trial.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060417/ap_on_re_us/governor_s_trial

And conservative people try to claim that the U.N is bad. Once all corruption is done in America and Canada then you can talk. U.N corruption is there, admitted, but it is at the same level as corruption that occurs in America or Canada.
 

sanch

Electoral Member
Apr 8, 2005
647
0
16
You totally missed the point. In the US there is accountability and transparency. The US demands the same controls at the UN. There is nothing wrong with that.

Canada has no controls hence the need for the accountability act. The Canadian Department of Justice does not pursue white collar criminals or corporations or politicians. It saves its resources to chase aboriginals and poor people. It’s a farce
 

Sassylassie

House Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,976
7
38
Sanch wrote. Department of Justice does not pursue white collar criminals or corporations or politicians. It saves its resources to chase aboriginals and poor people. It’s a farce

Sanch you forgot crimes against the un-washed masses in Canada. If someone crashes into your car good luck getting a police officer to investigate unless someone is injured or a fatality occurs-they give you a file number. If your home is broken into they don't investigate they give you a file number, they tell you there isn't enough resources to investigate. We the individuals of society don't count, a file number it's insulting. Now if someone gets caught shop-lifting at Walmart the Police will show up, investigate and Press Charges. Why is Walmart more important than we the "Little People"? Why? Why? Why?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
sanch said:
You totally missed the point. In the US there is accountability and transparency. The US demands the same controls at the UN. There is nothing wrong with that.

Canada has no controls hence the need for the accountability act. The Canadian Department of Justice does not pursue white collar criminals or corporations or politicians. It saves its resources to chase aboriginals and poor people. It’s a farce

The fact that you're not kidding is frightening, ITN likes to use the same phrase, (accountability and transparency) that's right out of the neocon handbook. According to numerous accounts there has never been an administration of the US that even remotely approaches this one for corruption. What the US demands of the UN is control of the UN. You are right about not chaseing white collor criminals though, but since most of them are in or close to government in both countries what do you realistically expect.
 

fuzzylogix

Council Member
Apr 7, 2006
1,204
7
38
I also hate the terms accountability and transparency, DB. They are always used right before something ISNT accountable or transparent.

Sanch, are you saying that the US doesnt need an accountability act because it is accountable and transparent at all times anyway??????

I didnt know this part of this very corrupt story. I remember a news story of this very sad car crash. The family was in a van following the truck of this driver who had not properly qualified for a trucking license. Something was falling off the truck, and several other truckers around were aware of this and desperately tried to get the truck to stop. He ignored them completely and didnt answere his CB and didnt respond to their honks etc. Finally the part of the truck fell off, and went under the van rupturing the gas tank and the parents climbed out only to have to watch their kids die. I think I would consider it very corrupt to find out the trucker had bought a license if they were my kids.

I am not sure why Sanch is trying to defend this...or am I
getting him wrong?
 

Said1

Hubba Hubba
Apr 18, 2005
5,336
66
48
51
Das Kapital
Re: RE: American corruption

fuzzylogix said:
I also hate the terms accountability and transparency, DB. They are always used right before something ISNT accountable or transparent.

Sanch, are you saying that the US doesnt need an accountability act because it is accountable and transparent at all times anyway??????

I didnt know this part of this very corrupt story. I remember a news story of this very sad car crash. The family was in a van following the truck of this driver who had not properly qualified for a trucking license. Something was falling off the truck, and several other truckers around were aware of this and desperately tried to get the truck to stop. He ignored them completely and didnt answere his CB and didnt respond to their honks etc. Finally the part of the truck fell off, and went under the van rupturing the gas tank and the parents climbed out only to have to watch their kids die. I think I would consider it very corrupt to find out the trucker had bought a license if they were my kids.

I am not sure why Sanch is trying to defend this...or am I
getting him wrong?

Don't take this the wrong way, but if you don't mind me asking, how old are you? Serious question, no flame intended.
 

sanch

Electoral Member
Apr 8, 2005
647
0
16
I’m not saying anything that the last 2 or 3 Canadian foreign ministers have not said abroad in respect to accountability and transparency forming the bedrock of democratic society. Read the Gomary report it is full of references for the need for accountability and transparency in Canada. The concepts are not exactly foreign imports and so no need to get this paranoid. It’s not a capitalist trick.

If you are at all connected to the real world you will be aware of the trials of Enron executives and the resignation of Tom DeLay and various lobbyists being indicted. We know as much about the Katrina disaster and the incompetent way it was handled by the Bush administration because of the transparency of the system. There are corrupt politicians but they eventually get caught.

None of this is true for Canada
 

sanch

Electoral Member
Apr 8, 2005
647
0
16
darkbeaver said:
sanch said:
You totally missed the point. In the US there is accountability and transparency. The US demands the same controls at the UN. There is nothing wrong with that.

Canada has no controls hence the need for the accountability act. The Canadian Department of Justice does not pursue white collar criminals or corporations or politicians. It saves its resources to chase aboriginals and poor people. It’s a farce

The fact that you're not kidding is frightening, ITN likes to use the same phrase, (accountability and transparency) that's right out of the neocon handbook. According to numerous accounts there has never been an administration of the US that even remotely approaches this one for corruption. What the US demands of the UN is control of the UN. You are right about not chaseing white collor criminals though, but since most of them are in or close to government in both countries what do you realistically expect.

First all these numerous accounts you have read are written by authors who are making millions promoting this idea that the US is a repressive place and every government action is but another little piece in a giant conspiracy intended to defraud (fill in the blank). You are their market. Where do you get the idea that transparency or accountability are neocon terms? Is there a source for this?
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
darkbeaver said:
The fact that you're not kidding is frightening, ITN likes to use the same phrase, (accountability and transparency) that's right out of the neocon handbook. According to numerous accounts there has never been an administration of the US that even remotely approaches this one for corruption. What the US demands of the UN is control of the UN. You are right about not chaseing white collor criminals though, but since most of them are in or close to government in both countries what do you realistically expect.

Yes, I do like to use it, because you can't. You don't have it.