1623 others browsing the Canadian Forums! Join us!

Invasion of Canada

Invasion of Canada

I think not

#61

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by FiveParadox

*is immune*

Hahaha!

Seriously though, in terms of an invasion of Canada, I would doubt that it would ever come to that; how could they possibly justify such an invasion on the world stage? Liberate us from our pesky democratic Parliament? Save us from the tyranny of the Governor General? What possible excuse could they have?

We don't need an excuse Five, when was the last time we ever needed an excuse?

Here's a better one for you, why on earth would we EVER invade Canada? Has that thought crossed anybody's mind yet?

I think not

#62

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by Mogz

Espionage? Hardly, i'm a ground pounder. As for my avatar, that was my plan all along bud. Show up one day with a 1/2 naked avatar and bend everyone to my will

Crazy Canadians, you're always up to something.

Machjo

#63

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

Hmmm... I like the basic strategy but it needs more detail. What about winning hearts and minds?

Canadian Plan to Domainte the USA.

Ok surprise attack of most of our forces into NY state.. they'd never expect it. At the same time we'd have to have alliances with most of the nations around the world.

How about trying to convince some Americans by promoting medicare if Canada wins the war.

While this is happening. Russia attacks Alaska and takes it no real problems and goes threw Canada to both defeand our border and to attack the cent and western states.

Going through Alaska, fine, that's their problem. But through Canada? I'd need to think about that.

Mexico pulls a Canada and attacks up into New Mexico and all the states which were annexed by the USA.Cuba would use it's sizable force (for it's size) and attacks florida.

Before the war is declared, spies ought to have been sent a long time in advance rubbing in the fact that English is such a pesky language to learn and that if the Southern states went to Mexico and Cuba, they wouldn't need to learn English anymore (the Gringos would need to learn Spanish instead; that should put a smile on their face, and that would be a sizeable segment of US sympathisers too).

Then we all wait for China or India to send over at least another million troops for us as re-enforcements to help push the Canadian, Russian, Cuban Mexican armiries into American terrortory. It works, well at least in a Civ 3 mod I made once.

Hmmm... be careful with China; they'd be eying Vancouver before any US city; just look at the Chinese population there: they could pull the same stunt on Vancouver as the Mexicans and Cubans could pull on the Southern states! But there are quite a few Chinese in the states too, so for some cities it might work and I'm sure China wouldn't mind a port on North America's west. India, like Russia, I don't know. I really don't think they'd be interested, and would have a really hard time in any hearst and minds vcampaing too.

As for Quebec, they definitely ought to move on Illinois, and like the Mexicans and Cubans, send spies in there first to promote Bill 101; I'm sure a few residents will jump to the cause!

missile

Conservative

#64

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

Don't breathe a word of this to a soul! Our secret leader in the USA is Bill Shatner & at any moment, he will start the coup d"etat there.

I think not

#65

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

I think "Operation Canadian Bacon" is in order.

Machjo

#66

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by missile

Don't breathe a word of this to a soul! Our secret leader in the USA is Bill Shatner & at any moment, he will start the coup d"etat there.

So has he started the hearts and minds campaing yet?

Since Shatner is an English Canadian, and the English Canadian part of plan is to woo Americans with medicare, have we managed to convince any of them to back the Canadian military should we move in?

And how's Quebec doing with getting Illinoi to back them militarily should they invade in exchange for not only medicare but Bill 101 too should they successfully take over Illinois?

And I strongly suggest we ensure that the Mexican, Cuban and Chinese hearts and minds campaigns are well under way before the military moves in, that way the US military will be busy with an insugency in the South and on the West coast to deal with by the time the Canadian military storms through the US border.

Mogz

Conservative

#67

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by I think not

I think "Operation Canadian Bacon" is in order.

Oh for the love of...

I think not

#68

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by Mogz

Quote: Originally Posted by I think not
I think "Operation Canadian Bacon" is in order.
Oh for the love of...

Edwin S. Simon, NBS News Anchor: The Canadians. They walk among us. William Shatner. Michael J. Fox. Monty Hall. Mike Meyers. Alex Trebek. All of them Canadians. All of them here.

Funny movie.

missile

Conservative

#69

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

True: The Mexican Army has already made several raids into Texas, and the US has not made any real efforts to stop them.

FiveParadox

Liberal

#70

RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

I think not, that is exactly what I mean! There's no reason for the United States to invade Canada at all — I mean, granted, we have some natural resources that the United States may epress interest in, in the future; but that's what trade is for, right?

I see no reason for Canada to feel threatened by the United States.

missile

Conservative

#71

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

Did you forget about all the WMD's we have hidden here? And the Dreaded Yellow Snow biological weapons we are preparing for the attack.

I think not

#72

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by FiveParadox

I think not, that is exactly what I mean! There's no reason for the United States to invade Canada at all — I mean, granted, we have some natural resources that the United States may epress interest in, in the future; but that's what trade is for, right?

I see no reason for Canada to feel threatened by the United States.

Good for you FiveParadox, and you most certainly should never feel threatened by the US.

Whenever I see similar threads like this on other forums, the biggest defense most people bring up is that the world would come to Canadas aid, and by doing so, they neglect who will NEVER allow such an invasion to take place, the American people.

Curiosity

#73

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

ITN... the American people and....

.... the military itself.

I believe there would be a major stand down and refusal to carry out any order such as northern invasion without a provocation initiated first.

Said1

Free Thinker

#74

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by missile

Don't breathe a word of this to a soul! Our secret leader in the USA is Bill Shatner & at any moment, he will start the coup d"etat there.

Have you seen his latest commercial? He must have some major back problems.

darkbeaver

Republican

#75

RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 21st, 2006

They will invade for water.

EagleSmack

#76

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by Mogz

Quote: Well what pushes my buttons is when you say that the Canadian Vest has the US Military in awe. The bottom line is making the equipment that is on the load bearing vest lighter. We naturally can't make ammo lighter or water but all armed forces use load bearing equipment. May I ask what makes the Canadian vest superior than the American as far as load bearing?
The US has not used black boots for years. When I was in we were issued black boots but now they issue Gortex boots to all Marines. Black leather boots are history and good ridens to them as they were not efficient at all. When I fought in Panama we were issued Vietnam era Jungle Boots which were slightly better than all leather boots. The Gortex boots they use today are more superior. Plus you don't have to polish them and that was a pain when you were in garrison.
Maybe as a Marine I don't like the idea of digging in at all but I do see the need for static defense in certain situations. As long as you are not digging in for an extended period of time. Mobile arty is more self sustained than a fixed arty unit. *Sigh* another American out of his element.
Ok, first off, I didn't deem this vest better. I personally love it, but the people who did deem it better are members of your military Eagle. They deemed it better for two reasons they listed to me:...
Quote has been trimmed

Funny that I was at Annapolis this year and the Marines all had Gortex Boots, meaning non black and non leather. They were a sand type color just like they wear in the desert. That is the type of boots that are being issued to the Marines.

Now maybe the Army still has some people wearing leather boots.

In my four years as a Marine I never worked or even met with a Canadian soldier. Nor did I see any of their gear.

Where ever you put gear the shoulders will bear the weight. Unless you attach it to your BDU trousers. How can it not?

EagleSmack

#77

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver

They will invade for water.

Cue the Twilight Zone theme!

Curiosity

#78

RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Eaglesmack

Could you translate to civilian for me please?

Whats BDU?

I have a heck of a time reading the milblogs because I don't understand half of the acronyms.

Thanks.

EagleSmack

#79

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by Wednesday's Child

Eaglesmack

Could you translate to civilian for me please?

Whats BDU?

I have a heck of a time reading the milblocks because I don't understand half of the acronyms.

Thanks.

Mea Culpa

Battle Dress Utilities (BDU)... In other words Camoflauge pants and shirts.

I think not

#80

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack

Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver
They will invade for water.
Cue the Twilight Zone theme!

Attached Images

twilightzone_154.jpg (30.5 KB, 354 views)

Curiosity

#81

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Eaglesmack

Thanks again.... It's a whole nuther language!!

Doryman

#82

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by FiveParadox

*is immune*

Hahaha!

Seriously though, in terms of an invasion of Canada, I would doubt that it would ever come to that; how could they possibly justify such an invasion on the world stage? Liberate us from our pesky democratic Parliament? Save us from the tyranny of the Governor General? What possible excuse could they have?

"We're bigger than you and we want some maple syrup."

EagleSmack

#83

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by Doryman

Quote: Originally Posted by FiveParadox
*is immune*

Hahaha!

Seriously though, in terms of an invasion of Canada, I would doubt that it would ever come to that; how could they possibly justify such an invasion on the world stage? Liberate us from our pesky democratic Parliament? Save us from the tyranny of the Governor General? What possible excuse could they have?

"We're bigger than you and we want some maple syrup."

Right... and not any of this flavored corn syrup crap. Hand over the good stuff or you're gonna get it!

darkbeaver

Republican

#84

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack

Quote: Originally Posted by Doryman
Quote: Originally Posted by FiveParadox
*is immune*

Hahaha!

Seriously though, in terms of an invasion of Canada, I would doubt that it would ever come to that; how could they possibly justify such an invasion on the world stage? Liberate us from our pesky democratic Parliament? Save us from the tyranny of the Governor General? What possible excuse could they have?

"We're bigger than you and we want some maple syrup."
Right... and not any of this flavored corn syrup crap. Hand over the good stuff or you're gonna get it!

You,ll have to pry that maple syrup outta my cold sticky fingers!

FiveParadox

Liberal

#85

RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

If you want it, you could always purchase some Speaker's Selection Maple Syrup from the House of Commons Boutique! For 375mL, it only comes to $19.99CAD!

I think not

#86

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by FiveParadox

If you want it, you could always purchase some Speaker's Selection Maple Syrup from the House of Commons Boutique! For 375mL, it only comes to $19.99CAD!

Sounds alot cheaper than invading, thanks!

unclepercy

#87

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver

They will invade for water.

You have hit the nail on the head - IF it comes right down to it.
And Texas is mighty thirsty, mighty powerful, and mighty persuasive - not to mention big buckola. We haven't had rain in over a year - our lakes are dry, and we need water desparately.

Why would you not share something as simple as water which you have in abundance - a basic human need? Would we have to invade you to get some water? Heck, I thought we could buy some. And, Tablet, why is it you are hogging all the rain the first damn place? Huh? Jest put it out there on the line.

And while we are at it, I'll form a line of Mexicans to dig a trench to your nearest waterway. And that would be? Hey, I betcha you might get a few fresh immigrants from way down south that way too! Cheap labor -

Uncle

darkbeaver

Republican

#88

Re: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

While not strictly related to the article, I thought I'd post these interesting figures from the latest edition of the New Scientist concerning water consumption. Did you know it takes...

20,000 litres of water to make 1kg of coffee

11,000 litres of water to make 1 quater-pounder hamburger

7,000 litres of water to make 1 cotton t-shirt

5,000 litres of water to make 1kg cheese

5,000 litres of water to make 1kg rice

3,000 litres of water to make 1kg sugar

2,000 litres of water to make 1 litre of milk

1,000 litres of water to make 1 kg of wheat.

While I may be from the twilight zone, the value of water is in many cases more than that of oil, and soon will be the most valuable commodity on the planet. Beavers know about water.

darkbeaver

Republican

#89

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 23rd, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by unclepercy

Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver
They will invade for water.
You have hit the nail on the head - IF it comes right down to it.
And Texas is mighty thirsty, mighty powerful, and mighty persuasive - not to mention big buckola. We haven't had rain in over a year - our lakes are dry, and we need water desparately.

Why would you not share something as simple as water which you have in abundance - a basic human need? Would we have to invade you to get some water? Heck, I thought we could buy some. And, Tablet, why is it you are hogging all the rain the first damn place? Huh? Jest put it out there on the line.

And while we are at it, I'll form a line of Mexicans to dig a trench to your nearest waterway. And that would be? Hey, I betcha you might get a few fresh immigrants from way down south that way too! Cheap labor -

Uncle

I,ll talk to some people, we can cut a deal with ya, barrell of oil for a barrell of water. If you look at the map you,ll see that the water will run down, if you send money for the pipe I will start construction in the spring. Mr Darkbeaver
RR1 Canada

EagleSmack

#90

Re: RE: Invasion of Canada

Feb 24th, 2006

Quote: Originally Posted by FiveParadox

If you want it, you could always purchase some Speaker's Selection Maple Syrup from the House of Commons Boutique! For 375mL, it only comes to $19.99CAD!

You mean we can buy this stuff w/o having to have a full scale invasion?

So I guess we can't "shock and awe" Canada.

Similar Threads

Invasion
by string | Sep 26th, 2007

US invasion into Canada....has it begun?
by Twila | Jul 30th, 2005