US Says New Evidence of Iran Nuclear Arms Ambition

Nascar_James

Council Member
Jun 6, 2005
1,640
0
36
Oklahoma, USA
Latest news off Reuters ...

There is real concern as U.S. and European officials (including Britain and Germany) demand that Iran stop all nuclear activities.

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsA...1_ROB308118_RTRUKOC_0_US-NUCLEAR-IRAN-USA.xml

Reuters:

Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:24 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New evidence suggests Iran has made significant progress in its pursuit of nuclear weapons and that should strengthen the case for increasing international pressure on Tehran to end the program, U.S. and European officials say.
The data, which in recent months was shared with the International Atomic Energy Agency and key countries, is "not definitive (but) it is strongly suggestive that Iran has made significant advancement toward weaponization," one U.S. official told Reuters.

Another U.S. official said that "no one is portraying this as definitive (but) it's one more piece of a strong circumstantial case that they are pursing a nuclear weapon."

The officials, who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue, gave no details of the documents.

Nuclear experts have been saying for months that the fact that U.S. claims about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction capabilities proved largely false is fueling doubts about intelligence on Iran.

The New York Times reported on its Web site on Saturday that in mid-July, senior American intelligence officials called the leaders of the IAEA to the top of a skyscraper overlooking the Danube in the Austrian capital Vienna and unveiled the contents of what they said was a stolen Iranian laptop computer.

The Americans showed data from more than 1,000 pages of Iranian computer simulations and accounts of experiments, saying they showed a long effort to design a nuclear warhead, the newspaper reported, quoting European and American participants in the meeting.

'STRONGEST EVIDENCE YET'

The newspaper said the U.S. officials argued the data was "the strongest evidence yet that, despite Iran's insistence that its nuclear program is peaceful, the country is trying to develop a compact warhead to fit atop its Shahab missile, which can reach Israel and other countries in the Middle East."

Iran, which kept a uranium enrichment program secret for 18 years until 2003, is facing referral to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions after failing to convince the international community its nuclear ambitions are entirely peaceful.

The New York Times said Iranian officials denied any knowledge of the warhead plans.

"We are sure that there are no such documents in Iran," the paper quoted Ali Larijani, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, as saying in an interview in Tehran. "I have no idea what they have or what they claim to have. We just hear the claims."

A U.S. official and a European official told Reuters that technical experts, including at the IAEA, who got the briefing were quite concerned at what the data shows.

But The New York Times said that apart from Britain, France and Germany -- which have joined Washington in demanding that Iran halt suspicious nuclear activities -- other countries remain skeptical.

Shahin Gobadi, a spokesman for an Iranian opposition group which first disclosed Tehran's secret activities in 2002 and has since revealed other details of the nuclear program, said his group was not the source of the stolen laptop.

But Gobadi said in a telephone interview and an e-mail from Paris that his group, the National Council of Resistance of Iran, had also acquired evidence Iran "is working on nuclear warheads."

The nuclear warhead project is being carried out by Shahid Karimi Industrial Group in the Hemmat Complex, northeast of Tehran, said Gobadi, whose group is on the U.S. State Department list of terrorist organizations.

Nuclear warheads and missiles are also being developed at the Parchin military site, 20 miles southeast of Tehran, he said.

By reverse-engineering a cruise missile it obtained from Ukraine, Iran has "mastered the technology to produce (nuclear-capable) cruise missiles and is making great progress toward this end," Gobadi said.
 

PoisonPete2

Electoral Member
Apr 9, 2005
651
0
16
everybody knows 'American officials' are liars and warmongers. They already provided the Iranians with 26 years of tyranny under the Shah. Either help with national progress or leave others alone. Americans have nuclear weapons. They shouldn't point at others until they rid themselves of these weapons. Bunch of hypocrites.
 

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
RE: US Says New Evidence

Old news off Reuters ...

There is real concern as world officials (excluding the US) demand that Israel stop all nuclear activities and destroy its arsenal of 200 or more nuclear warheads.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,362
60
48
Re: RE: US Says New Evidence of Iran Nuclear Arms Ambition

PoisonPete2 said:
everybody knows 'American officials' are liars and warmongers. They already provided the Iranians with 26 years of tyranny under the Shah. Either help with national progress or leave others alone. Americans have nuclear weapons. They shouldn't point at others until they rid themselves of these weapons. Bunch of hypocrites.

second this one.

(amazing how "concerned" some can be over issues in far off countries when their own country is led by liars , thieves and criminals.

Fool us once.......shame on you. Fool us twice.....shame on us.

.......so even if that organization in washington did speak the truth........by accident.......who is going to believe them?? The price you pay for lying .cheating, and other crimes.

and even if Iran has nuclear capability etc.........So bloody what?? The US HAS STOCKPILES .......and has no right to demand others to do what it is not prepared to do .

one is justified in being more "concerned" about what the fecking u.s. has planned......than Iran or anyplace else at the moment. The u.s. is the only one that has USED nuclear weapons.......and is the only one now that will war on another nation......at a drop of a lie
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: US Says New Evidence

The US is also developing new nukes. Bush and his boys have talked about developing a first strike capability and about using field nukes and mini-nukes. They have used banned weapons in Iraq.

They have no credibility on this issue.
 

GL Schmitt

Electoral Member
Mar 12, 2005
785
0
16
Ontario
A Legal US Nuclear Attack Against Iran

The real reason for the IAEA Iran resolution

By Jorge Hirsch
Nov 12, 2005
Information Clearing House



On September 24 of this year, the United States finally achieved a goal it had persistently pursued over several years. Iran was declared by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) to be in "non compliance" with its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

The resolution passed by the IAEA is remarkably weak. It does not set a date for Iran to be referred to the UN Security Council, and it does not even mention the possibility of sanctions. It even notes that Iran has made "good progress" in correcting its "breaches," all of which date back to before October 2003. The LA Times characterized it as a "gentle slap." It is instead an enormous thud.

We pointed out before that the probable reason for the U.S. to insist on the passage of such a weak resolution (on the face of opposition by Russia and China to stronger resolutions) was to reach a stalemate in the Security Council that would provide an excuse for U.S. military action, which would necessarily include the use of nuclear weapons against Iran [1], [2], [3]. There is, however, an even stronger reason for the U.S. to have pushed for this resolution so adamantly, a reason which is valid even if Iran is not referred to the Security Council at the forthcoming November 24 meeting or thereafter, and that supports the predicted scenario.

The IAEA resolution of September 24 2005 allows the United States to carry out a nuclear attack against Iran "legally."




For further information follow: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10971.htm