#1Oct 3rd, 2005
US Supreme Court moves even further right.
#2
Re: US Supreme Court moves even further right.
Oct 3rd, 2005
A woman from Texas, Great news. Get your abortions while you can.
#4
Re: US Supreme Court moves even further right.
Oct 3rd, 2005
After the appointment of John Roberts, most sensible-minded people in the US would have hoped that Bush would at least try to give the impression that some semblance of balance existed in the Supreme Court. That being the case, the replacement for Sandra Day O'connor should be someone in the same mould, someone who is not a right-wing hardliner, someone whose opinion cannot be prejudged, someone who will maintain the balance of the court.
Lo, who do they get? Another Bush crony.
Would the last true democrat to leave America please turn out the light?
Lo, who do they get? Another Bush crony.
Would the last true democrat to leave America please turn out the light?
#5
Re: US Supreme Court moves even further right.
Oct 3rd, 2005Quote: Originally Posted by Hard-Luck Henry
You obviously don’t know the process. It’s the President’s choice, not a guide line of rules, not a consensus of DNC people. He was voted in knowing that he would have at least 1, possibility of 2, now a real possibility of 3 (wow) nominations. If he puts up David Duke and he’s passed by the senate guess what, he’s in. After the appointment of John Roberts, most sensible-minded people in the US would have hoped that Bush would at least try to give the impression that some semblance of balance existed in the Supreme Court. That being the case, the replacement for Sandra Day O'connor should be someone in the same mould, someone who is not a right-wing hardliner, someone whose opinion cannot be prejudged, someone who will maintain the balance of the court.
Lo, who do they get? Another Bush crony.
Would the last true democrat to leave America please turn out the light?
I’m sure you guys would like to see 2 clones of Ruth Bader Ginsburg a ACLU lawyer. Well next time a DNC person wins an election (when was the last time ????) you can place a member on the Supreme Court (if bush doesn’t get all the people young enough to stay there for 20-30 years), until then enjoy the ride.
#7
RE: US Supreme Court move
Oct 3rd, 2005
At what point do we open the borders to refugees seeking asylum from the Bush regime?
#9
Re: RE: US Supreme Court move
Oct 3rd, 2005Quote: Originally Posted by Reverend Blair
Traffic promises to be backed up to the Ohio River.At what point do we open the borders to refugees seeking asylum from the Bush regime?
#10
Re: US Supreme Court moves even further right.
Oct 3rd, 2005
[quote="Texas1"]
But then again, he could be pardoned.
OY VEY, 1213 miles to the nearest Canadian Border Customs House!
Quote: Originally Posted by Hard-Luck Henry
Yikkes! David Duke, but were lucky, he is a convicted Felon, can not hold Public Office!You obviously don’t know the process. It’s the President’s choice, not a guide line of rules, not a consensus of DNC people. He was voted in knowing that he would have at least 1, possibility of 2, now a real possibility of 3 (wow) nominations. If he puts up David Duke and he’s passed by the senate guess what, he’s in.
But then again, he could be pardoned.
OY VEY, 1213 miles to the nearest Canadian Border Customs House!
Similar Threads
174
5
2
15
7