Isn't interesting China can move 600,000 people out of the way of Typhoon Talim and yet the United States was unable to move around 100,000 people out of New Orleans in the days before Katrina hit. Is it possible a communist dictatorship -- well, actually a globalist socialist dictatorship -- is more effective at protecting its people than the "democratic" government of the United States? It runs against all the brainwashing the U.S. "education" system attempted to pump into my brain since I entered kindergarten in the late 50s.
Hurricane Katrina is a huge and unavoidable demonstration of the political reality the government and the corporate media strive every moment to conceal or divert attention away from -- the United States government exists to service the elitist plutocracy and its corporations and banking-financial institutions. It does not exist to protect citizens who pay outrageous taxes for which they receive nothing in return. It was known the levees in New Orleans were insufficient and sooner or later a hurricane would decimate the city and yet the federal government did nothing about it because it has other priorities -- servicing a small number of rich people and multinational corporations. Recall Grover Norquist declaring it was the intention of the fanatical right now firmly in control to reduce government "down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub." Norquist's comment is prophetic, considering what happened on the Gulf coast and the response of the government. Drown, indeed.
It remains to be seen if the American people will wake up to the fact the government does not exist to protect them but instead is a parasite that steals their hard-earned money at gunpoint and uses it to cater to the whims of the plutocracy and their globalist agenda to reduce large swaths of the world into a miserable and (as in the case of New Orleans) Darwinian gulag where the poorest or poor are allowed to starve and fend for themselves after natural disasters.
Bush's typical lackadaisical response to the disaster reveals his true state of mind -- the poor and disenfranchised, who he long ago as a student at the Harvard Business School characterized as lazy and shiftless, more or less get what they deserve. Katrina is a public relations issue for Bush, not a humanitarian crisis. He was similarly unmoved by the Asian tsunami and as a privileged son of the plutocracy (and as a sociopath) feels absolutely nothing for people (or poor and middle class people) in need because his "base," as revealed in a video snippet in Michael Moore's documentary, is the rich and powerful, not the people, even the dupes who voted for him. It will be nothing short of astounding if these people continue to support Bush in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. However, considering the severity and depth of brainwashing in the United States, it would not be surprising if the "little people" continue to fawn over Bush, even as they soon begin to pay four or five dollars a gallon for gas.
Hurricane Katrina is a huge and unavoidable demonstration of the political reality the government and the corporate media strive every moment to conceal or divert attention away from -- the United States government exists to service the elitist plutocracy and its corporations and banking-financial institutions. It does not exist to protect citizens who pay outrageous taxes for which they receive nothing in return. It was known the levees in New Orleans were insufficient and sooner or later a hurricane would decimate the city and yet the federal government did nothing about it because it has other priorities -- servicing a small number of rich people and multinational corporations. Recall Grover Norquist declaring it was the intention of the fanatical right now firmly in control to reduce government "down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub." Norquist's comment is prophetic, considering what happened on the Gulf coast and the response of the government. Drown, indeed.
It remains to be seen if the American people will wake up to the fact the government does not exist to protect them but instead is a parasite that steals their hard-earned money at gunpoint and uses it to cater to the whims of the plutocracy and their globalist agenda to reduce large swaths of the world into a miserable and (as in the case of New Orleans) Darwinian gulag where the poorest or poor are allowed to starve and fend for themselves after natural disasters.
Bush's typical lackadaisical response to the disaster reveals his true state of mind -- the poor and disenfranchised, who he long ago as a student at the Harvard Business School characterized as lazy and shiftless, more or less get what they deserve. Katrina is a public relations issue for Bush, not a humanitarian crisis. He was similarly unmoved by the Asian tsunami and as a privileged son of the plutocracy (and as a sociopath) feels absolutely nothing for people (or poor and middle class people) in need because his "base," as revealed in a video snippet in Michael Moore's documentary, is the rich and powerful, not the people, even the dupes who voted for him. It will be nothing short of astounding if these people continue to support Bush in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. However, considering the severity and depth of brainwashing in the United States, it would not be surprising if the "little people" continue to fawn over Bush, even as they soon begin to pay four or five dollars a gallon for gas.